Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
American higher education: Where free speech goes to die
American higher education: Where free speech goes to die
Dec 4, 2025 2:29 PM

You’ve heard of that mythical place where elephants go to die? Apparently, these giants “know” they are going to die, and they head off to a place known only to them.

Free speech in the United States goes off to die as well, but there is no myth surrounding this. Free speech dies in our colleges and universities. Just ask American Enterprise Institute’s Christina Sommers. Sommers is a former philosophy professor and AEI scholar who recently spoke at Oberlin College. Her speech was excellent, but it apparently frightened the pants off a bunch of students (oh, I probably can’t say that. It likely makes someone feel violated.) They paraded outside the room where Sommers spoke, holding signs invoking “trigger warnings” and announcing a “safe room” where those who found Sommers’ talk too much to handle. Her topic? “What’s Right (And Wrong) With Feminism.” She was harassed and harangued both in-person and online for daring to speak such words.

Kirsten Powers, a Fox News contributor, notes that free speech is anything but on our college campuses. She writes at The Daily Beast that even the mere whiff of something that might possibly offend someone somewhere is stamped out before it even leaves a person’s mouth – the very opposite of free speech. Even edian Chris Rock has noticed.

Chris Rock told journalist Frank Rich that he had stopped playing college campuses because of how easily the audiences were offended. Rock said he realized some time around 2006 that “This is not as much fun as it used to be” and noted George Carlin had felt the same way before he died. Rock attributed it to “Kids raised on a culture of ‘We’re not going to keep score in the game because we don’t want anybody to lose.’ Or just ignoring race to a fault. You can’t say ‘the black kid over there.’ No, it’s ‘the guy with the red shoes.’ You can’t even be offensive on your way to being inoffensive.” Sadly, Rock admitted that the climate of hypersensitivity had forced him and edians into self-censorship.

What ends up happening is that people on college and university campuses either don’t say exactly what they mean for fear of reprisal, or they end up doing this weird dance of “I meant to say” and “I didn’t mean to offend” and “Oh, just forget about it. I’ll shut up now.”

In December 2014, the president of Smith College, Kathleen McCartney, sent an email to the student body in the wake of the outcry over two different grand juries failing to indict police officers who killed African-American men. The subject heading read “All Lives Matter” and the email opened with, “As members of the munity we are struggling, and we are hurting.” She wrote, “We raise our voices in protest.” She outlined campus actions that would be taken to “heal those in pain” and to “teach, learn and share what we know” and to “work for equity and justice.”

Shortly thereafter, McCartney sent another email. This one was to apologize for the first. What had she done? She explained she had been informed by students “the phrase/hashtag ‘all lives matter’ has been used by some to draw attention away from the focus on institutional violence against black people.” She quoted two students, one of whom said, “The black students at this school deserve to have their specific struggles and pain recognized, not dissolved into the larger student body.” The Daily Hampshire Gazette reported that a Smith plained that by writing “All Lives Matter,” “It felt like [McCartney] was invalidating the experience of black lives.” Another Smith sophomore told the Gazette, “A lot of my news feed was negative remarks about her as a person.” In her apology email McCartney closed by affirming mitment to “working as a white ally.”

McCartney clearly was trying to support the students and was sympathetic to their concerns and issues. Despite the best of intentions, she caused grievous offense.

As my dad would say, you can’t win for losing.

This is not something to jest about, however. It’s very serious. Colleges, of all places, should be where all ideas get thrown into the mix, hashed out, discussed, debated. Instead, a few people tightly control what passes as dialogue, and everyone else sits with their mouths clamped shut. What was once the essence of the college experience has e a punishable offense. That’s not hyperbole:

At Colorado College, a private liberal arts college, administrators invented a “violence” policy that was used to punish non-violent speech. The consequences of violating a speech code are serious: it can often lead to public shaming, censoring, firings, suspensions, or expulsions, often with no due process.

If someone doesn’t like what you have to say, you can lose your job and reputation, and be opened up to almost unbearable harassment in the social media sphere.

A good college education broadens one’s mind. You hear and discuss things you had not before considered, and learn to debate. In this on-going quest for truth, one learns that while everyone gets to speak their mind, not everyone is right. Once colleges and universities shut down free-flowing discussions of everything from affirmative action to zoology, free speech is dead. Even worse, those students – in a few short years – will take those views of microagression, trigger warnings and safe spaces out into the world with them.

Be careful what you say around them.

Read “How Liberals Ruined College” at The Daily Beast.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Has the purpose of corporations changed?
In his influential 1962 book Capitalism and Freedom economist Milton Friedman promoted the position of shareholder primacy by declaring that a corporation has no real “social responsibility” to the public, since its only concern is to increase profits for the shareholders. Social responsibility would be the responsibility (or not) of the shareholders. Since then this “shareholder theory” has became the dominant view of the purpose of the corporation. But in 1984 the philosopher and business professor R. Edward Freeman wrote...
How churches are helping people with medical debt
A recent study found that 66.5 percent of all bankruptcies were tied to medical issues. An estimated 530,000 families turn to bankruptcy each year because of medical issues and bills, the research found. But a new nonprofit is trying to alleviate the problem by getting churches to take on their neighbors’ unpaid bills. In an article for Christianity Today, Acton’s Jordan Ballor responds to this new form of philanthropy: “Taking up debts, helping to relieve each other’s burdens . ....
Video: Deltan Dallagnol on the fight against corruption in Brazil
On Thursday, June 20th, Acton ed Deltan Dallagnol to deliver an evening plenary address at Acton University 2019. A Harvard-trained attorney, Deltan Dallagnol gained international attention as the lead prosecutor in Operation Car Wash, one of the largest corruption probes in Latin American history. The Car Wash investigation implicated four former presidents and dozens of congressmen and high profile businessmen in Brazil. The case spread to nearly all Brazilian states and more than 12 countries, involving 14 presidents and former...
Acton Line podcast: What is cronyism? Samuel Gregg on reason and faith in Western civilization
Cronyism is everywhere, affecting industries, entrepreneurs and customers and distorting the market through political advantage. So what is cronyism and how does promise genuine capitalism? Anne Rathbone Bradley, the current academic director at The Fund for American Studies, as well as the vice president of Economic Initiatives at the Institute for Faith, Work and es onto the show to explain how cronyism affects the market and how bat it. Afterwards, Acton’s director of research, Samuel Gregg, joins the show to...
Free marketers should take social conservatives’ concerns more seriously
It’s no secret that major rifts have opened up between advocates of free markets and social conservatives in recent years. As someone who (1) ascribes to what would be conventionally called socially conservative views (though I think they’re more accurately called the insights of natural law and right reason) and (2) regards a free market economy as the most prudent set of economic arrangements for munities, and nations, I find myself constantly exposed to these debates. In some cases, the...
Thanks, China, for your ‘foreign aid’ to America’s low income workers
Several years ago economist Bryan Caplan provided themost succinct and helpful statement about how we should think about free trade: “We’d be better off if other countries gave us stuff for free. Isn’t ‘really cheap’ the next-best thing?” As with any simplification, critics could find many reasons to grumble about what that leaves unstated (e.g., trade leads to offshoring of jobs). But it highlights an important point about why free trade matters. Free trade is about as close to a...
Scholars discover Locke manuscript arguing for the toleration of Catholics
Kimberly Uslin reports on the discovery of a of previously unknown manuscript by the philosopher John Lockeat the Greenfield Library at St. John’s College: According to Walmsley and Waldmann, this was the first major discovery of newwork by Locke in a generation. While there are occasionally unseen letters or signed documents found, something this “substantial in content” is incredibly rare—particularly because it represented a previously unknown perspective held by Locke. The manuscript essentially consists of two lists: the first, a...
Understanding the words we use
Today, we face a prevalent problem when making arguments about trending topics. Words such as capitalism, socialism, conservative, liberal and other broad categorical terms all have a wide range of meanings and emotions attached to them. Political and ideological topics are discussed passionately and ad nauseam in the news, with friends and around the dinner table. This raises a serious question: How can we have meaningful conversations without clearly defining the words we are using? In order to have any...
Will the Vatican’s economics drive Matteo Salvini to victory?
Italy’s coalition government seems ready to break apart, with Matteo Salvini of the League (who is seen as the country’s real leader)calling for new elections to force the Five Star Movement out of his alliance and Five Star trying to form a new coalition with the Democratic Party in order to oust Salvini. In an engagingnew essay for Acton’sReligion & Liberty Transatlantic website, Italian journalistStefano Magni writes about the unexpected role played in this electoral crisis by the Vatican. How...
Bishop Robert Barron explains Marxism in 21 minutes
Despite Marxism’s growing popularity among young people, church authorities spend little time discussing the topic – and when they do, they often speak in a misleading way. Thankfully, Bishop Robert Barron, the auxiliary bishop of the Archdiocese of Los Angeles, addressed the topic at length last week. He made “Karl Marx and Millennials” the topic of a recent episode of his podcast, “Word on Fire.” In addition to giving a brief overview of Communist philosophy, Bishop Barron answers such questions...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved