Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
America remains
America remains
Dec 8, 2025 5:09 AM

From the ancient Greeks and Romans – from Heraclitus and Polybius to Livy – Western civilization came to accept the idea that all governments, but especially free ones, go through distinct organic and biological stages. They are born, they grow old and corrupt, and they die. Many, such as Livy, focused on the death aspect of this cycle, arguing that Rome had been declining from its very origins.

In looking at the history of Rome, he wrote, “I would have him trace the process of our moral decline, to watch, first, the sinking of the foundations of morality as the old teaching was allowed to lapse, then the rapidly increasing disintegration, then the final collapse of the whole edifice.” Livy asked how this happened. His answer for ancient Rome could readily fit modern America: “Of late years wealth has made us greedy, and self-indulgence has brought us, through every form of sensual excess, to be, if I may so put it, in love with death, both individual and collective.”

Indeed, the entire history of Rome was the history of moral decline. Certainly not alone in his worries, Tacitus agreed with Livy, seeing in the Germanic peoples of Europe the hope of regeneration and rebirth.

America’s Founding Fathers were deeply concerned with this inevitable, organic cycle, believing that, though young, America could readily fade if her people lost their way morally, ethically, and spiritually. “We wish for the duration of her virtue; we sigh at every appearance of decline; and perhaps, from a dread of deviations, we may be suspicious of their approach when none are designed,” proclaimed Mercy Otis Warren (1728-1814), a forgotten founder and Anti-Federalist, in her 1805 history of the American Revolution. America, she continued, “has in great measure lost her simplicity of manners, and those ideas of mediocrity which are generally the parent of content; the Americans are already in too many instances hankering after the sudden accumulation of wealth, and the proud distinctions of fortune and title. They have too far lost that general sense of moral obligation, formerly felt by all classes in America.”

If historian Gordon Wood is correct in his assessment of the matter in his work The Radicalism of the American Revolution, Warren was not only not alone in her fears, but she also echoed the fears of nearly every other American founder. Indeed, Wood insists, almost every single one of the Founding Fathers had concluded by the end of his individual life that, though America remained a republic in name, it had already lost its soul and would soon die a profound death. In Wood’s retelling, only Maryland’s Charles Carroll of Carrollton (1737-1832) remained optimistic about America’s future, albeit cynically so. In this, Wood was mistaken; Carroll of Carrollton – the longest lived of the American founders – had lost hope, as well. From the American founding onward, a constant theme in American history had e fearing, identifying, and proclaiming the end of the republic. One need look no further than Thomas Cole’s 1833-1836 series of paintings, The Course of Empire, to see in a powerful visual medium the life and death of societies, especially republics.

Fast-forward to the year of our Lord 2020. We live in a time of extreme confusion. Our society is as wealthy as any society ever has been. And yet, for us, there is no contentment. While racial injustices have certainly and horrifically occurred on some of our urban streets, our cities overall have e nearly uncontrollable as angered crowds and legitimate assemblers vie with roving bands of lustful looters, pillaging plunderers, and mayhem-fueled murderers. Statues topple, fists fly, and torrents of furious words spill forth. Protestors build guillotines, declare themselves autonomous, and threaten “more blood in the streets.”

Meanwhile, our politicians serve not mon good, but their own personal interests and the interests of their party. “I am the Democratic Party,” one politician claimed recently, in a moment of egotistical Manicheanism. When asked about the extreme revolutionaries advancing violence in several American cities, he simply said they were motivated by an “idea” and were not organized in any menacing way.

If ever there were a time for despair in American history since the dread days of the American Civil War, 2020 is it. Is the republic truly over? Have we gone into extreme middle age and corruption, hovering over the valley of death? Have we reached the end? These are certainly not absurd or fanciful wonderings.

One of Western civilization’s greatest thinkers and a man who lived through a moment similar to ours, Edmund Burke (1729-1797), would say “no.” We have not reached the end, and quite possibly, we will not for hundreds if not thousands of years. He more or less rejected the idea that all societies go, inevitably and inalterably, through stages of birth, decline, and death.

Still, Burke’s world looked bleak, as bleak as ours does. Burke – an advocate of American independence as well as rights for the Irish, Asian Indians, and British Roman Catholics – had done everything in his power to oppose the French Revolution. He opposed not just the revolutionaries, but the very collectivist and atheistic ideas that animated the French Revolution. They were analogous, Burke knew, to a disease, an infection, that once let loose would spread into every part of the world.

Rightly, Burke believed that the French Revolution signified nothing less than a European civil war, with revolutionaries not confined to France but to be found in every part of the continent. England herself, Burke lamented in the mid-1790s, was probably one-fifth lost to the revolutionary sentiment. Though extremists probably represented only 20% of the population, that minority could undermine much of England in her domestic and (especially) in her foreign policy.

Yet whatever setbacks might threaten the English people, as well as to his own reputation, Burke maintained hope in the struggle against the revolutionaries. He wrote:

We are therefore never authorized to abandon our country to its fate, or to act or advise as if it had no resource. There is no reason to apprehend, because ordinary means threaten to fail, that no others can spring up. Whilst our heart is whole, it will find means, or make them. The heart of the citizen is a perennial spring of energy to the State. Because the pulse seems to intermit, we must not presume that it will cease instantly to beat. Thepublic must never be regarded as incurable.

What gave Burke such faith, especially in his denial of what had been regarded as Polybian or Livian truths, staples of Western thought and civilization? The individual human person, Burke knew, was an infinite creature made in the image of an infinite God. Each person, as Pope John Paul II would state in the twentieth century, is an unrepeatable center of dignity and freedom, thus always providing a new face of God to the world. Each human person is, thus, a new hope, a new possibility, a renewal of love.

In a speech to Parliament, Burke became downright metaphysical and theological about this critical thought. It is well worth quoting Burke at length on this, especially as he wrestles with the theological issue of free will and fate, finding a harmonizing sentiment of the two:

Taking it for granted that I do not write to the disciples of the Parisian philosophy, I may assume, that the awful Author of our being is the author of our place in the order of existence; and that having disposed and marshalled us by a divine tactic, not according to our will, but according to His, He has, in and by that disposition, virtually subjected us to act the part which belongs to the place assigned us. We have obligations to mankind at large, which are not in consequence of any special voluntary pact.They arise from the relation of man to man, and the relation of man to God, which relations are not matters of choice. On the contrary, the force of all the pacts which we enter into with any particular person or number of persons amongst mankind, depends upon those prior obligations. In some cases the subordinate relations are voluntary, in others they are necessary – but the duties are pulsive. When we marry, the choice is voluntary, but the duties are not matter of choice. They are dictated by the nature of the situation. Dark and inscrutable are the ways by which e into the world. The instincts which give rise to this mysterious process of nature are not of our making. But out of physical causes, unknown to us, perhaps unknowable, arise moral duties, which, as we are able perfectly prehend, we are bound indispensably to perform.

In other words, while we have no choice about the situation into which we are born – our parents, our ethnicity, our country, and our language – once we reach the age of reason, every choice we make until our last breath is a moral and ethical one.

In his last days, in 1797 – when the French Revolution seemed more powerful than it ever had before and Britain as weak as it had ever been – Burke persisted in his arguments for human dignity and against revolutionary ego. “Never succumb to the enemy,” he told an ally as he approached death. “It is a struggle for your existence as a nation; and if you must die, die with the sword in your hand; there is a salient, living principle of energy in the public mind of England which only requires proper direction to enable her to withstand this or any other ferocious foe; persevere til this tyranny be overpast.”

If Polybius, or Livy, or Mercy Otis Warren is correct, we as Americans might very well be at the beginning, in the middle, or near the end of the grand republican experiment. Regardless, Burke is certainly correct, and we must take into account every last remaining heartbeat. Whatever the situation of our world – no matter how dreadful it might seem at the moment – we must act morally and ethically, no matter the circumstances. Each of us, therefore, must serve as a new (if finite) face of infinite wisdom. All the looters, murderers, plunderers, and mayhem-makers in the world cannot change the moral fabric of the universe – or our duty to it.

For now, America remains.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Rev. Robert Sirico: Reply to America Magazine
Anytime I can get a progressive/dissenting Catholic magazine/blog like the Jesuit-run America simultaneously to quote papal documents, defend the Magisterium of the Catholic Church, embrace the Natural Law and even yearn for a theological investigation “by those charged with oversight for the Church’s doctrine” of a writer suspected of heresy, I consider that I have had a good day. And to think that all this was prompted by two sentences of mine quoted in a New York Times story on...
Standing Up to Rousseau: Remarks at a Fortnight for Freedom
I had the opportunity to speak at the Fortnight for Freedom event held by the Church of the Incarnation in Collierville, Tennessee, on June 21. The venue and the crowd were among the best I’ve ever encountered. Below, you can read my excerpted remarks: On the Question of Religious Liberty If I understand correctly, this is the beginning of the Fortnight for Freedom here at the Church of the Incarnation and around the nation. The need for this special fortnight...
Vocation Infusion Learning Community
This week, 40 pastors and church leaders are gathered to discuss important ideas of integrating faith, work, and vocation into our daily lives. Vocation is integral, not incidental to the missio Dei, the work that God has called us to do each day. The pastors and church leaders represent a diversity of evangelical traditions and geographic locations in the US. Over the next year, this group will meet for face-to-face retreats, field trips and a few webinars with the goal...
Two reviews of ‘Defending the Free Market’
Father Peter Preble, pastor of St. Michael Orthodox Church, and Stephen Kokx, adjunct professor of political science and columnist, both recently reviewed Rev. Robert Sirico’s new book Defending the Free Market: The Moral Case for a Free Economy. Fr. Preble says the book changed his outlook on how to treat the poor. He refers to the third chapter and highlights the book’s emphasis on asking new questions: The most striking of the chapters has to be chapter three, Want to...
The Religious Left’s Hunger for Big Government
“I was Hungry and You . . . Called your Congressman” is a good report from Kristin Rudolph over at the IRD blog. The article covers Bread for the World president David ments to a group of “emergent Christians” in Washington D.C. From the piece: Beckmann lamented that “very little progress has been made against poverty and hunger” in the US over the past few decades. This, he explained, is because ”we haven’t had a president who’s made the effort”...
Richard Vedder on ‘Federal Student Aid and the Law of Unintended Consequences’
Dr. Richard Vedder, the Edwin and Ruth Kennedy Distinguished Professor of Economics at Ohio University and the director of the Center for College Affordability and Productivity, recently addressed the topic of federal aid and the cost of higher education, an issue that has received some attention on the PowerBlog as of late.Vedder critiques federal aid initiatives like the Pell Grant, which today helps the middle class more than the poor, but saw a twofold size increase from 2007 to 2010....
Lessons in Liberty from a Little House on the Prairie
We could learn a lot about liberty from our pioneer forebears, argues Meghan Clyne. And an exemplar of this model of freedom and self-reliance can be found on our children’s bookshelves, in the Little House books of Laura Ingalls Wilder: Who in America’s past, then, can show us the way to a mature, sustainable democratic life — one defined not by the rebellious seizure of liberty, but by the consistent and wise exercise of it through a dedication to self-reliance?...
‘Defending the Free Market’ on C-SPAN
On C-Span2’s BookTV, Rev. Sirico talks about his new book, ‘Defending the Free Market: The Moral Case for a Free Economy’, and argues that moral people should embrace capitalism and the free market. This talk was hosted by the Catholic Information Center in Washington, DC.The next scheduled air times are Saturday, June 30th at 7pm ET and Sunday, July 1st at 6:15am ET. ...
Growing Detroit
Renaissance Center (GM building). Creative Commons: paul (dex) bica via Compfight Some time back I argued that urban farming and the entrepreneurial spirit in Detroit was something that should be embraced rather than dismissed. Detroit mayor Dave Bing has given verbal support for urban munity farms in the past, but in many cases some regulatory hurdles remained and he was somewhat skeptical at times about the importance of large scale urban agriculture projects. But that ambivalence seems to be history,...
Text of the Obamacare Ruling
For those wanting to read the recently released decision, the Alliance Defense Fund has a copy of the Supreme Court decision on Obamacare. ...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved