Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
America is crossing economic Rubicon of government management
America is crossing economic Rubicon of government management
Jul 8, 2025 4:45 AM

If anyone had any lingering doubts about where American economic policy is heading over the next fouryears, those should have been removed by President Joe Biden’s proposed $6 trillion budget for 2022. Whatever Congress does with this proposal, there’s no doubt that government is now viewed by leading policymakers and, judging from recent surveys, by millions of Americans as the primary engine that should be driving the economy.

Whether it is the disinterest in the implications of America’s public debt levels exceeding those of World War II, or the confidence that government-spending is central to growing the economy, we are witnessing a return to many of the orthodoxies which characterized postwar economic policy until the late-1970s. The label applied to those orthodoxies is “Keynesianism.”

By that, I don’t mean that people in the White House or the Treasury Department are eagerly devouring John Maynard Keynes’ famous 1936 book “The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money” or embracing every idea advanced by the neo-Keynesians who occupied economics departments and finance ministries the world over from the late-1940s onwards.

Rather, I’m referring to two things. The first is a rejection of supply-side economics: the idea that long-term economic growth is best secured by lowering taxes, reducing regulation, and diminishing trade barriers. This goes hand-in-hand with departure from the skepticism about state economic intervention that held sway — at least rhetorically —from the 1980s until the 2008 financial crisis.

Disillusionment with these ideas began gaining traction following the Great Recession and thereafter acquired growing momentum. This leads us to the second phenomenon marking our present Keynesian moment: the growing faith in the state which crisscrosses today’s political spectrum.

On the right, economic nationalists want greater use of industrial policy. These are targeted government interventions which seek to foster, reorient or protect particular economic sectors. The same people appear supportive of the Biden Administration’s continuation of the protectionist positions advanced during Donald Trump’s presidency.

Some don’t hide their admiration of the Communist China’s state capitalism model.

Meanwhile, on the left, progressives ranging from Sen. Elizabeth Warren to Harvard economist Jeffrey Sachs are saying America should be more like your average European social democracy, wherein the state intervenes at every stage of economic life — from cradle to grave — in an effort to engineer greater economic equality.

Many are also proponents of “stakeholder capitalism” (the idea that profit is just one of several goals to be pursued by business). That movement has e extremely influential. Even the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has embraced much of its agenda.

But what, you might ask, does all this have to do with a British economist who died 75 years ago?

The answer lies not so much in the details of postwar policies, or even many of the ruminations of Keynes himself. It’s a question of the mindset policymakers bring to the economy.

In simple terms, Keynes put great stock in top-down planning. I’m not referring here to outright socialism. Instead, the Keynesian outlook means believing that government institutions can and should manage the economy pletely taking it over.

The means which they employ to do so include high-levels of government spending, extensive regulation and, if necessary, pumping purchasing power into the economy via heavy deficit-spending and keeping interest rates low. The goal is to constantly prod and poke people’s economic actions in ways that smooth (if not avoid altogether) the boom-bust cycle, promote steady growthand deliver more equal economic es.

One problem with this strategy is that it’s impossible for governments to know and absorb all the information that they would need to know and absorb if they were to pursue this process successfully and permanently. Failure to accept this means that Keynesian-style economic planning can’t help but make significant mistakes. That’s why most adventures in industrial policy are usually ineffectual or downright disastrous.

The effects of such errors might not be apparent in the short-to-medium term. Yet they will manifest themselves over the long run — big time. Consider, for example, how federal government meddling in the housing market in the bined with the Federal Reserve keeping interest-rates too low for too long between 1999 and 2005 contributed to the 2008 financial crisis and the subsequent brutal recession.

Another criticism of these approaches is that they gradually reduce the scope for people’s economic freedom. Again, I’m not talking about the severe constraints that characterized Eastern mand economies. I’m referring to the impositions that grow over time as governments constantly seek to stimulate the pace of economic growth and shape the form which it assumes.

To these criticisms, those with Keynesian outlooks would respond that governments have a responsibility to manage the economy and, in doing so, pursue particular goals. The alternative, they say, is to accept intolerably wide wealth-disparities, the social tensions which go along with theseand the shocks generated by boom and bust. Such results, Keynes himself argued, can’t help but fuel the extremes of left and right and thereby threaten constitutional democratic government.

I happen to find such defenses of Keynesian-style managed economies deeply unconvincing. That, however, is not the point. What’s significant is that American economic policy is increasingly shifting in this direction and many Americans are perfectly OK with it.

The problem facing advocates of supply-side economics is that once elite and public opinion head in a particular direction, they are hard to reverse. Indeed, it’s likely that only a major crisis would open up major opportunities for shifting economic policy decisively back towards the market.

A major factor driving the move away from America’s postwar neo-Keynesian consensus was stagflation: the nightmare of high inflation, low growthand high unemployment which engulfed Western nations in the 1970s. This crisis discredited Keynesian economic prescriptions and created conditions in which policymakers and everyday Americans began taking seriously the case for market liberalization.

Crises, however, don’t happen very often, and many people get hurt in the process.

America is now crossing an economic Rubicon.

I’m confident that if this doesn’t encounter determined opposition, then, at some point in the future, the dysfunctionalities associated with trying to manage economies will return with a vengeance.

That’s one bad déjà vu no-one should want America to endure.

This article originally appeared in The Detroit News on June 2, 2021

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Disaster Response and the Ministry of Presence
I wrote a piece on the Church’s response to disaster relief in the Spring issue of Religion & Liberty. The article for R&L is in part an extension of mentary “Out of the Whirlwind: God’s Love and Christian Charity” after a tornado hit Joplin, Mo. in May. Being a Katrina evacuee myself, I returned to the Mississippi Gulf Coast for a time after seminary and the devastation of so many things I was familiar with and had known was simply...
Relief Efforts Stall Out in Haiti
Acton’s Rev. Robert A. Sirico published an article in Religion and Liberty in the fall of 2010 on Haiti and how we could help it recover. It has been several months since then, and eighteen months since a 7.0 magnitude earthquake struck Haiti near Port-au-Prince, killing around 230,000 people. Eighteen months is a long time and many, including myself, have pushed Haiti into the background of their minds. However, Haiti is still desperately struggling to recover from this terrible disaster....
Otto von Habsburg (1912-2011)
I cannot permit the death of His Imperial and Royal Highness Otto von Habsburg at age 98 on July 4th to pass unnoticed. To look into his face was to gaze into the map of the 20th Century, and to hear him recount his ideas, insights and encounters was worth more than an entire course in European history in most universities. Only slightly acquainted with the man (his father Emperor Karl was beatified by Pope John Paul II in 2004),...
Real Healthcare Reform
Many politicians have talked of repealing the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“Obamacare”). Mitt Romney has said nullifying the healthcare law would be one of his first actions if he was elected president. However, rather than just repealing the law and going back to the status-quo, with minor changes, the American people should demand true reform. In 2001, Milton Friedman, the famed, Nobel-prize winning economist, published an article titled “How to Cure Health Care.” (Although worthy of serious consideration,...
Editorial: Intergenerational Ethics and Economics
My editorial, “Intergenerational Ethics and Economics,” appears in the latest issue of the Journal of Markets & Morality (more details about that issue here). In this short piece I explore some of the implications and intergenerational consequences of public debt. For this I take my point of departure with the much-discussed “A Call for Intergenerational Justice,” but I also point out the importance of considering opportunity cost and how that concept has been applied in an analogous conversation about climate...
Space and “the primal desire to conquer”
Space shuttle Atlantis lifts off the launch pad for the final space shuttle mission. Image credit: NASA TVImagine you’re eight and you’re given a dog. The first thing your parents say is that you need to take care of him: feed him, play with him in the backyard, and train him so that he doesn’t do bad things in the house. You and the new dog quickly e “the dog and his master.” That well-worn phrase can tell us something...
Questions for Ethanol
Political news changes quickly, and now reports ing out of Washington DC that Senator Dianne Feinstein, who has been leading the way in killing the ethanol subsidy and tariff, has struck a deal with Senators Amy Klobuchar and John Thune, two stalwarts for protecting ethanol. While the rumored deal does not indicate the repeal of the blending mandate it is a step in the right direction. However, while we wait on Congress and the President for action, the Brazilian ethanol...
Pope Benedict and Liturgical Beauty
There has been a lot of buzz throughout the Roman Catholic Church as it prepares to implement a new missal on November 27. As the Church begins a new chapter in its history, Tony Oleck writes an article for Crisis Magazine titled “The True Beauty of Liturgy.” Oleck is a Roman Catholic seminarian for the Congregation of Holy Cross and a summer intern at the Acton Institute. In his article Oleck explains the reasoning behind Pope Benedict’s new missal while...
Water: A Right or a Commodity?
Water is ing scarcer and even more of a necessity than it was before. And while stories of water scarcity typically occur in underdeveloped, arid countries, the United States and other developed countries must realize they are no longer exceptions and must take into consideration the importance of water and the allocation of its use. A recent article in the Wall Street Journal explores the severe lack of water in Palm Beach, Florida. Residents are restricted to once-a-week watering schedules...
Journal of Markets & Morality 14, no. 1 (Spring 2011)
The newest edition of the Journal of Markets & Morality is now available online to subscribers. This issue of the journal features a Scholia translation of selections from On the Observation of the Mosaic Polity by Franciscus Junius (1545-1602), the Huguenot, Reformed, scholastic theologian (a Latin version of Junius’ original treatise is available for download at Google Books, along with a host of his other works). Best known as a professor of theology at Leiden University from 1592–1602, Junius authored...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved