Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Amazon, Kmart, and the Moral Limits of Shopping
Amazon, Kmart, and the Moral Limits of Shopping
Jul 14, 2025 3:15 PM

Good now, sit down, and tell me, he that knows,

Why this same strict and most observant watch

So nightly toils the subject of the land,

And why such daily cast of brazen cannon,

And foreign mart for implements of war;

Why such impress of shipwrights, whose sore task

Does not divide the Sunday from the week;

What might be toward, that this sweaty haste

Doth make the night joint-labourer with the day:

Who is’t that can inform me?

–Marcellus, in Shakespeare’s Hamlet

Human beings, with our diversity of gifts, talents, and dispositions, were created to, as Adam Smith put it, “truck, barter, and exchange.” In other words, we were made to trade.

But we were not created to be constantly trucking, bartering, and exchanging. That’s the central truth about humanity that mandment concerning Sabbath municates:

Remember the Sabbath day by keeping it holy. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is a sabbath to the Lord your God. On it you shall not do any work, neither you, nor your son or daughter, nor your male or female servant, nor your animals, nor any foreigner residing in your towns. For in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, but he rested on the seventh day. Therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and made it holy.

Over at The Gospel Coalition today, I expand on the news of Amazon’s new delivery service on Sundays to discuss “Sabbath Rest and the Moral Limits of Consumption.”

Just as we sleep each night to give our bodies rest from daily labors, our souls (as well as our bodies) need rest from mundane and worldly activities. This is the kind of rest that the Sabbath is designed to provide. The Sabbath principle calls us to rest from the gratification of our earthly desires, whether they be morally permissible or not, and whether we consider them to be work or leisure.

Now even though Sunday is not technically the Sabbath, there remains a need for a regular time and place for worship, fellowship, munion. We still need rest from our daily work and worries. This is in part why I see the expansion of market activity to fill all available time, 24/7/365, as troubling. We are not called to simply spend as much as we can as often and as quickly as possible. Thus the principle of Sabbath rest, I would argue, might even have something to say about holidays as well as holy days, Thanksgiving and Christmas as well as every Sunday.

Despite these concerns, I am not a legalist with respect to the Sabbath and the strictness of its observation. In large part I simply want Christians to be more aware of what their consumption patterns mean for others. A variety of Christian traditions have worked out the specifics of what Sabbath observance demands in distinctive ways. Within the broad strokes of the Sabbath requirement, that also means there is space for individual Christians to observe the Sabbath in ways that are meaningful within their particular contexts and callings.

Some Christians refuse to work on Sundays, whether for pay or not. Others will not patronize restaurants or other retail establishments. In some traditions, such normal activities as cutting the grass, playing sports, or even watching TV are forbidden. There are even some Christian websites that are inaccessible on Sundays, while other businesses remain closed on the first day of the week explicitly out of religious convictions. But as I conclude over at TGC, “amid diverse expressions of faithfulness to the Sabbath-keeping mandate, the principle of mandment still persists and still governs the morality of human activity.”

Now many who decry increasing worldliness will blame the businesses who open on Thanksgiving morning, or who decide to open on Sundays. And although there is certainly a dynamic relationship between the providers of goods and services and the consumers of them, it must be acknowledged that retailers do face real dilemmas, even if they are to some extent of their own making. And in the end, the lion’s share of the blame lies with the consumers. It lies with those of us who have lined up on Thanksgiving for early Friday sales. It lies with those of us who cannot wait to get our shipments from Internet retailers until Monday.

The market is designed to provide us with what we desire, and market actors will generally respond to the signals provided by the customers. So it is high time to think more deeply about what our consumption municate in terms of expectations of others. The principle of instant gratification is no way for a sustainable, civilized, or ethical economic system to exist, and as we continue to run up against and transgress the moral limits of market activity, we will reap the dysfunction in our economic system and broader society that we have sown.

As Nicole Gelinas puts it, “It’s shoppers, not the government, who should force stores to close.”

Think about this before you line up to shop at Kmart tomorrow morning.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The Economics Nobel
My response to the awarding of the Nobel Prize in Economics to Elinor Ostrom and Oliver Williamson was published on National Review Online: Unlike a certain other Nobel Prize, the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel actually requires evidence of substantial achievement. Mere aspirations and lofty rhetoric count for nothing. This year’s Nobel Prize in Economics has been given to two economists, Elinor Ostrom and Oliver Williamson, who have deepened our understanding of economic governance....
America’s Uncontrolled Debt and Spending is the Real ‘Waterloo’
In mentary this week, “America’s Uncontrolled Debt and Spending is the Real ‘Waterloo,’” I offer the well known point that debt and spending threatens our liberty and prosperity. It is ing very evident that it will be up to citizens to demand accountability from their lawmakers, as I mentioned. What has been tried before has not worked. In terms of liberty, Thomas Jefferson declared, “The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground.” What...
Kling on Conservatism and Authority
Arnold Kling continued last week’s conversation about the relationship between conservatism and libertarianism over at EconLog. Kling’s analysis is worth reading, and he concludes that the divide between conservatives and libertarians has to do with respect (or lack thereof) for hierarchical authority. Kling does allow for the possibility of a “secular conservative…someone who respects the learning embodied in traditional values and beliefs, without assigning them a divine origin.” I’m certainly inclined to agree, and I think there are plenty of...
What hath Vienna to do with Colorado Springs?
Working as we do here at the intersection between economics and theology, the relationship between various kinds of classically liberal, libertarian, Austrian, and other economic modifiers and religion in general and Christianity in particular is in constant view. Sometimes the conversation is friendly, sometimes not so much. Sometimes the differences are less apparent, sometimes more. Once in awhile a piece will appear on the Acton site or from an Acton writer that brings this discussion to the fore. Last mentary...
Potential and the Peace Prize
In his book Elements of Justice (reviewed in the Journal of Markets & Morality here), University of Arizona philosophy and economics professor David Schmidtz introduces the idea of desert not simply as pensatory notion, but also as including a promissory aspect. That is, what we deserve isn’t always about only what we have done. There might be a real sense in which what we do after an opportunity provides a kind of retroactive justification for having been given a chance....
Catholics and Health Care
The Detroit News published mentary on Catholics and health care reform in today’s newspaper. A slightly longer version of the article will appear in tomorrow’s Acton News & Commentary: Catholic America is about as divided about health care reform as the rest of the country. But there are a small number of non-negotiables for Catholics that principally concern any provisions that facilitate or encourage the intentional termination of innocent human life or diminish existing conscience exemptions. These issues dwarf everything...
Review: Billy Graham and the Rise of the Republican South
Explaining the realignment of American Southern politics is often a favorite area of study among historians and scholars. A region that was once dominated by yellow dog Democrats, has for the most part continued to expand as a loyal region for the Grand Old Party. Among the earliest and mon narrative among liberal historians and writers is the belief that the realignment in the South had to do with a backlash against desegregation. Steven P. Miller in his new book...
Healthcare and Catholics: True and False Arguments
This week’s Acton Commentary: Healthcare reform – it’s one of those causes almost everyone favors, but which almost automatically produces sharp arguments when we ask what it means and how it might be realized. You would have had to be living in a cave for the past eight months to be unaware that Americans are deeply divided on this matter, and that the division runs clean through the middle of munities. That includes Catholic America. Of course, there are a...
Journal of Markets & Morality, Spring 2009
We’re happy to announce that the latest print issue of the Journal of Markets & Morality is available online. The Spring 2009 issue includes a noteworthy study by Alan T. Y. Chan and Shu-kam Lee. In “Christ and Business Culture: Another Classification of Christians in Workplaces According to an Empirical Study in Hong Kong,” Chan and Lee outline four types of Christians at work: Christian soldiers, panic followers, strugglers, and Sunday Christians. Following the classification, Chan and Lee “develop a...
Capitalism is Not Based on Greed
In a new essay at The American, Jay Richards explains why capitalism isn’t based on greed. In Acton’s first documentary, The Call of the Entrepreneur, Richards along Rev. Robert Sirico, Sam Gregg, Michael Novak and others touch on this matter in making the moral case for the free economy. ...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved