Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Alejandro Chafuen in Forbes: Arthur Laffer’s Medal of Freedom
Alejandro Chafuen in Forbes: Arthur Laffer’s Medal of Freedom
Mar 3, 2026 10:38 AM

On June 19, President Trump awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom to economist Arthur Laffer, noted as a proponent of supply-side economics and famous for the concept of the “Laffer curve,” which states that taxes will not increase revenue if they rise beyond a certain level. Alejandro Chafuen, Acton’s Managing Director, ments today in Forbes on Laffer and his award. He also adds a wealth of historical precedent, pointing out that Laffer’s ideas have roots in many thinkers of centuries past, both moral and economic.

Taxes relative to GDP are the highest they have been since records of the data have been kept, according to Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) figures that parisons of the 36 top world economies. The fact that the United States is on the 20% bracket with lower taxes is in great part due to Arthur Laffer.

The huge tax pressure around the world is not the result of chance – it is the natural e of a culture that has placed its faith in the role of government experts and efforts rather than in the private sector. Bloated bureaucracies that required high taxes also existed in the 16th and 17th centuries. Those who championed lower taxes in those eras used the name courtiers to describe the leaders of those bureaucracies who possessed greater access to kings, queens and decision makers.

Not all courtiers were superfluous in much the same way not all bureaucrats and public servants play to the “Deep State.” Many do indeed place citizens above their own interests. But in his magnificent small book Bureaucracy: Servant or Master, William Niskanen, former chairman of the board of the Cato Institute, showed how the bureaucracy’s tendency is to serve itself, not the taxpayer.

Whenever a leader relies on economists who propose solutions that go against bureaucratic rule – such as proposals to reduce taxes – we can expect opposition from a legion of “respected” experts. This happened to Arthur Laffer, who recently received the Medal of Freedom, the country’s highest honor. President Trump spoke at length during the award ceremony and was correct when he stated that prominent academics derided Laffer’s theories as “insanity,” “totally wacky,” and pletely off the wall.”

Laffer’s daring lesson monly known as the “Laffer curve,” which in brief states that when taxes rise above a certain level, they reduce the total amount collected – has a long and illustrious pedigree. Ludwig von Mises (1881-1973) the noted Austrian economist, wrote in his most important economic treatise that “every specific tax, as well as a nation’s whole tax system, es self-defeating above a certain height of the rates.”

Read the entire article here.

(Homepage photo credit: Trump presents Arthur Laffer the Medal of Freedom. US Government, public domain.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The 2006 Texas distinguished scientist wants you dead
Well, maybe not you personally. But in his speech to the Texas Academy of Science in March, University of Texas Professor Eric Pianka did announce his hope that a mutated Ebola virus would wipe out ninety percent of the human population–soon. His motives are, of course, the essence of nobility. We’ve bred like rabbits, you see, and drastic measures are needed to restore the balance. Amateur scientist Forrest Mims broke the story in his column for The Amateur Scientist. (Full...
‘Overwhelmed by orphans’
Where will they go? Churches and religious relief organizations are playing a much more active role in U.S. foreign policy. And that has been obvious in recent months in the recovery efforts for the South Asian tsunami and the Pakistan earthquakes. In March, the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life invited Andrew Natsios, who recently left the U.S. Agency for International Development as chief administrator, to talk about his five-year term there. This is a must-read for anyone who...
Chirac waves the white flag
French President Jacques Chirac has given in to the student protests in his country, protests that called for the removal of the First Employment Contract. This is a controversial new law giving employers greater freedom in whom they fire amongst under-26 employees. The law, as I am sure you’ve seen, sparked students protests for weeks. Michael Miller in last Wednesday’s Acton News and Commentary addressed the deeper issue here: economic ignorance and moral apathy–I won’t repeat his analysis here. But...
French ‘security’ and economic reality
As student demonstrations in France mount, the government finds it increasingly difficult to dismantle restrictive labor laws that are directly tied to high unemployment rates. Michael Miller examines the political and cultural factors that are behind the French fear of economic risk taking. Read mentary here. ...
First Things imbroglio
A former editor at First Things, Damon Linker, has written a piece for The New Republic, which attacks, among others, his former boss, Fr. Richard John Neuhaus. Linker claims that Neuhaus is a “theocon,” who wants to merge religious authority and political power. Rick Garnett at Mirror of Justice has all the details, including links to blog discussions and his previous post, criticizing Linker’s argument. I’ve read First Things for years and, in my judgment, the truth lies with Linker’s...
Catholics on immigration
Jordan’s post below observes the divisions among evangelicals on the hot-button issue of immigration. Its divisiveness—cutting across the usual lines of conservative/liberal and Democrat/Republican—has made the immigration debate an unusual and therefore extraordinarily interesting one. The issue also divides Catholics. Los Angeles Cardinal Roger Mahony has been among the most promising national voices in favor of immigrant rights. But ments have not gone unchallenged among Catholics. Activist Jim Gilchrist denounced Mahony’s views. Kathryn-Jean Lopez at NRO questioned them more delicately....
Immigration is a symptom
Large numbers of migrant populations going out of a particular area or nation should be viewed in large part as a signal of something. There are reasons for people to pick up and move, and policy and governing bodies would do well to examine these reasons. When business close facilities and open elsewhere, it is usually because the destination location has a better economic and business-friendly environment. So the natural course of action when examining this phenomena is to ask...
AIDS: not that bad?
Bryan Caplan at EconLog says that he has long wondered about the validity of the statistics of the spread of AIDS on the African continent: The whole story had a quasi-Soviet flavor to it. The main difference: Soviet growth statistics were too good to be true, while African AIDS statistics were too bad to be true. Reflecting on the incentives cemented my skepticism: Just as the Soviet Union had a strong incentive to exaggerate its growth numbers in order to...
Surprise! Evangelical politics isn’t univocal
“Letter on Immigration Deepens Split Among Evangelicals,” trumpets a story from the Washington Post. Ever since evangelicals received such credit in the election and reelection of George W. Bush, the ins and outs of evangelical politics has recieved a greater share of media attention. A great part of this attention has focused on so-called “splits” among evangelicals, as a way to highlight the newly recognized reality that all evangelicals aren’t card-carrying Republicans. So from issues like immigration to global warming,...
Budziszewski on subsidiarity
Following up on yesterday’s entry about Ronald Aronson’s call for a renewed socialism in American politics, I offer this paragraph from J. Budziszewski’s book, What We Can’t Not Know. Discussing the principle of subsidiarity as first explicitly articulated by Pius XI in the encyclical Quadragesimo Anno, Budziszewski writes, As Pius explained, what pushed the principle of subsidiarity to the forefront was the crisis in civil society brought about by the industrial revolution. For a time it seemed as though the...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved