Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Alejandro Chafuen in Forbes: Arthur Laffer’s Medal of Freedom
Alejandro Chafuen in Forbes: Arthur Laffer’s Medal of Freedom
Mar 2, 2026 10:17 PM

On June 19, President Trump awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom to economist Arthur Laffer, noted as a proponent of supply-side economics and famous for the concept of the “Laffer curve,” which states that taxes will not increase revenue if they rise beyond a certain level. Alejandro Chafuen, Acton’s Managing Director, ments today in Forbes on Laffer and his award. He also adds a wealth of historical precedent, pointing out that Laffer’s ideas have roots in many thinkers of centuries past, both moral and economic.

Taxes relative to GDP are the highest they have been since records of the data have been kept, according to Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) figures that parisons of the 36 top world economies. The fact that the United States is on the 20% bracket with lower taxes is in great part due to Arthur Laffer.

The huge tax pressure around the world is not the result of chance – it is the natural e of a culture that has placed its faith in the role of government experts and efforts rather than in the private sector. Bloated bureaucracies that required high taxes also existed in the 16th and 17th centuries. Those who championed lower taxes in those eras used the name courtiers to describe the leaders of those bureaucracies who possessed greater access to kings, queens and decision makers.

Not all courtiers were superfluous in much the same way not all bureaucrats and public servants play to the “Deep State.” Many do indeed place citizens above their own interests. But in his magnificent small book Bureaucracy: Servant or Master, William Niskanen, former chairman of the board of the Cato Institute, showed how the bureaucracy’s tendency is to serve itself, not the taxpayer.

Whenever a leader relies on economists who propose solutions that go against bureaucratic rule – such as proposals to reduce taxes – we can expect opposition from a legion of “respected” experts. This happened to Arthur Laffer, who recently received the Medal of Freedom, the country’s highest honor. President Trump spoke at length during the award ceremony and was correct when he stated that prominent academics derided Laffer’s theories as “insanity,” “totally wacky,” and pletely off the wall.”

Laffer’s daring lesson monly known as the “Laffer curve,” which in brief states that when taxes rise above a certain level, they reduce the total amount collected – has a long and illustrious pedigree. Ludwig von Mises (1881-1973) the noted Austrian economist, wrote in his most important economic treatise that “every specific tax, as well as a nation’s whole tax system, es self-defeating above a certain height of the rates.”

Read the entire article here.

(Homepage photo credit: Trump presents Arthur Laffer the Medal of Freedom. US Government, public domain.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
How to Develop a Christian Mind in Business School
“Why are you going to business school?” my friend asked, with some concern, “It seems like such a waste of your time. Why not study history or philosophy or the Great Books or something you’d enjoy.” It was a good question. I mitting myself to spending two years going to school full-time (while working full-time) to get a degree in a subject—business administration—in which I didn’t feel particularly passionate. But I felt that God was calling me to go to...
Dear President Obama: Don’t Live in the Zero-Sum Universe
Zero-sum: It’s thinking that if you have more, I have less. One more baby in a family is one more mouth to feed, and less food for everyone else. One new business opens up on the block, and all the rest of the businesses suffer. The guy in the cubicle next to you gets a raise, and you get nothing, because there’s nothing left. Except that it’s wrong. Lots of people know it, too. P.J. O’Rourke knows it, and he...
The ‘Ghost of Fiscal Future’
Matt Mitchell at Neighborhood Effects offers an interesting perspective regarding the fiscal cliff. As we hurriedly approach the edge, Mitchell’s insights ought not to be ignored, whatever the e of today’s last minute meeting at the White House. Evoking the Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come from Charles Dickens’s A Christmas Carol, he writes, At the risk of mixing metaphors, we should think of the fiscal cliff as the Ghost of the Fiscal Future. It is a bleak lesson in...
Was 2012 the Best Year Ever?
An article in the Christmas issue of The Spectator make a surprising and bold claim: It may not feel like it, but 2012 has been the greatest year in the history of the world. That sounds like an extravagant claim, but it is borne out by evidence. Never has there been less hunger, less disease or more prosperity. The West remains in the economic doldrums, but most developing countries are charging ahead, and people are being lifted out of poverty...
Hobby Lobby Denied Request For HHS Mandate Relief
The National Catholic Register and Associated Press are reporting that Justice Sonia Sotomayor has denied Hobby Lobby (and a pany, Mardel, Inc.) its request to opt out of the HHS mandate to provide abortifacients as health care to employees. Justice Sotomayor’s decision stated that Hobby Lobby did not meet the legal standard for preventing them plying with the government mandate. However, David Green, CEO and owner of Hobby Lobby disagrees, saying the lawsuit violates his family’s faith. The Becket Fund...
The Year in Commentary: Ray Nothstine
Every Wednesday we publish the Acton Commentary,a weekly article that covers topics related to Acton’s mission. As es to a close I thought it would be worth highlighting the mentaries that have been produced by Acton Institute staffers over the past year. The following list includes articles published in 2012 by Ray Nothstine, an associate editor at Acton and managing editor of Religion & Liberty: February 01, 2012 Playing Politics with Unemployed Veterans June 06, 2012 Calvin Coolidge and the...
The Year in Commentary: Various
Every Wednesday we publish the Acton Commentary, a weekly article that covers topics related to Acton’s mission. As es to a close I thought it would be worth highlighting the mentaries that have been produced by Acton Institute staffers over the past year. The following list includes articles published in 2012 by various Acton Institute staffers: Kishore Jayabalan, director of Istituto Acton February 08, 2012 Obamacare vs the Catholic Bishops May 02, 2012 Vatican Affirms ‘Supernatural’ Purpose to Work Life...
Work, Leisure, and the Search for Daily Meaning
Over at AEIdeas, James Pethokoukis challenges our attitudes about work and leisure by drawing a helpful contrast between economists John Maynard Keynes and Deirdre McCloskey. First, he points to “Economic Possibilities for our Grandchildren,” in which Keynes frames our economic pursuits as a means to a leisurely end: Thus for the first time since his creation man will be faced with his real, his permanent problem-how to use his freedom from pressing economic cares, how to occupy the leisure, which...
Samuel Gregg: United States succumbing to ‘Eurosclerosis?’
In the New York Post, Acton Research Director Samuel Gregg looks at “the spread throughout America of economic expectations and arrangements directly at odds with our republic’s founding” and asks what the slow walk to “Europeanization” means for the long term. Gregg: Unfortunately there’s a great deal of evidence suggesting America is slouching down the path to Western Europe. In practical terms, that means social-democratic economic policies: the same policies that have turned many Western European nations into a byword...
Children and a Culture of Choice
The Choice of Hercules between Virtue and PleasureEli Horowitz over at Rust Belt Philosophy takes up my post from earlier this week, “The Christ Child and a Culture of Birth.” For the moment we can leave aside the accusations of racism latent in my view, as my demographic concerns are related to replacement levels and not to the question of majority/minority demographic shifts. I do want to address one claim from Horowitz about the nature of cultural privilege, though. His...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved