Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Alejandro Chafuen in Forbes: Arthur Laffer’s Medal of Freedom
Alejandro Chafuen in Forbes: Arthur Laffer’s Medal of Freedom
Dec 24, 2025 5:22 PM

On June 19, President Trump awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom to economist Arthur Laffer, noted as a proponent of supply-side economics and famous for the concept of the “Laffer curve,” which states that taxes will not increase revenue if they rise beyond a certain level. Alejandro Chafuen, Acton’s Managing Director, ments today in Forbes on Laffer and his award. He also adds a wealth of historical precedent, pointing out that Laffer’s ideas have roots in many thinkers of centuries past, both moral and economic.

Taxes relative to GDP are the highest they have been since records of the data have been kept, according to Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) figures that parisons of the 36 top world economies. The fact that the United States is on the 20% bracket with lower taxes is in great part due to Arthur Laffer.

The huge tax pressure around the world is not the result of chance – it is the natural e of a culture that has placed its faith in the role of government experts and efforts rather than in the private sector. Bloated bureaucracies that required high taxes also existed in the 16th and 17th centuries. Those who championed lower taxes in those eras used the name courtiers to describe the leaders of those bureaucracies who possessed greater access to kings, queens and decision makers.

Not all courtiers were superfluous in much the same way not all bureaucrats and public servants play to the “Deep State.” Many do indeed place citizens above their own interests. But in his magnificent small book Bureaucracy: Servant or Master, William Niskanen, former chairman of the board of the Cato Institute, showed how the bureaucracy’s tendency is to serve itself, not the taxpayer.

Whenever a leader relies on economists who propose solutions that go against bureaucratic rule – such as proposals to reduce taxes – we can expect opposition from a legion of “respected” experts. This happened to Arthur Laffer, who recently received the Medal of Freedom, the country’s highest honor. President Trump spoke at length during the award ceremony and was correct when he stated that prominent academics derided Laffer’s theories as “insanity,” “totally wacky,” and pletely off the wall.”

Laffer’s daring lesson monly known as the “Laffer curve,” which in brief states that when taxes rise above a certain level, they reduce the total amount collected – has a long and illustrious pedigree. Ludwig von Mises (1881-1973) the noted Austrian economist, wrote in his most important economic treatise that “every specific tax, as well as a nation’s whole tax system, es self-defeating above a certain height of the rates.”

Read the entire article here.

(Homepage photo credit: Trump presents Arthur Laffer the Medal of Freedom. US Government, public domain.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Dietrich Bonhoeffer, the Two Kingdoms, and Protestant Social Thought Today
Jordan Ballor’s paper, “Dietrich Bonhoeffer, the Two Kingdoms, and Protestant Social Thought Today,” just made the Social Science Research Network’s current Top Ten download list for Philosophy of Religion eJournal. From the abstract: Last century’s Protestant consensus on the rejection of natural law has been quested in recent decades, but Protestant social thought still has much work to do in order to articulate a coherent and cogent witness to contemporary realities. The doctrine of the two kingdoms has been put...
Video: Colorado Priest Condemns Socialism at GOP Assembly
You might get goose bumps watching this fiery speech by Fr. Andrew Kemberling. After all, it is not every day we hear a wholesale condemnation socialism from a priest on the “pulpit” of a conservative political rally! This vociferous pastor from St. Thomas More parish in Centennial, Colo., delivered an impassioned address last May. It may be old news, but the video has gained enormous popularity and even gone viral (over 1.3 million views) just one month before the U.S....
Foreign aid: ‘It’s not actually going to the people’
Speaking at a conference at Bethel College, Acton’s Director of Media, Michael Miller, told the audience that while good intentions are necessary in the fight against poverty, they simply aren’t enough. Miller spoke directly on the topic of foreign aid to developing nations: Western countries providing financial aid to developing nations seems to make sense, but there is no correlation between the extent of aid and economic progress in those countries, Miller said. Much of the aid goes to foreign...
The New York Times Doesn’t Understand Freedom of Religion
In a model of Orwellian doublespeak, the New York Times published an editorial yesterday defending the ridiculous decision by U.S. District Judge Carol E. Jackson to dismiss the lawsuit filed earlier this year by Frank O’Brien and his O’Brien Industrial Holdings LLC. O’Brien had challenged the requirement that businesses offer employees contraception coverage through health care insurance, claiming it unconstitutionally violated his religious beliefs and the Catholic philosophy he applied in running his business. Not so, say the NYT editors,...
ResearchLinks – 10.05.12
Call for Papers: “Economics, Christianity & The Crisis: Towards a New Architectonic Critique” The 2008 credit crisis is not only a crisis in economics, but also a crisis in the basic concepts and assumptions that underlie our thinking about economics, economics as a science. Critical analyses are called for of both economic practices and economic theory. New concepts and paradigms are needed. The first Kuyper Seminar Amsterdam aims at exploring what resources the Christian tradition has to offer for developing...
Acton Commentary: Obama Administration Leaves Human Trafficking Victims Out in the Cold
“Most of us enjoy an economy where we can purchase with ease the things we need and enjoy. However, there is no moral justification for mercialization of some things; human beings are not products to be bought and sold,”writes Elise Hiltonin the latest Acton Commentary (published October 3).The full text of his essay follows. Subscribe to the free, weekly Acton News & Commentary and other publicationshere. Obama Administration Leaves Human Trafficking Victims Out in the Cold By Elise Hilton Imagine...
Get the Audio Edition of Defending the Free Market
The audio book version of Rev. Sirico’s Defending the Free Market has just been released, and is available at Amazon. If you haven’t bought book yet (or even if you have) you’ll want to download a copy today. ...
Economics is Intuitive
Economist Bryan Caplan sets out to prove thatbasic economics is intuitive: To make my prima facie case, I’m going to present a few allegedly counterintuitive economic propositions, then explain them at a 6th-grade level. 1. Counterintuitive claim: Free trade makes countries richer, even if the other countries have big advantages like cheaper labor or more advanced technology. Intuitive version: We’d be better off if other countries gave us stuff for free. Isn’t “really cheap”the next-best thing? 2. Counterintuitive claim: Strict...
Access Denied: Property Rights for Women Not a Given
A few days ago, a documentary entitled: Half the Sky: Turning Oppression into Opportunity for Women Worldwide, a portion of which is devoted to depicting the situation of violence against women in Sierra Leone, aired on Public Broadcasting Station (PBS). Not portrayed in the documentary, but also a factor that puts women in the country at a disadvantage is little or no right to private property. An INRN article states, “…the vast majority of women in Sierra Leone live under...
Mr. President, it isn’t your job to ‘channel’ America’s genius, grit and determination
One line from last night’s debate leapt out at me. It wasn’t a stumble amidst the cut and thrust of open debate. It was during President Obama’s closing statement—400 words that I’m guessing he and his staff crafted with painstaking care. About half way through his summation, the president gave his vision of government in a nutshell. He said that “everything that I’ve tried to do, and everything that I’m now proposing for the next four years,” was “designed to...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved