Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Agape and Eros
Agape and Eros
Apr 4, 2025 12:01 PM

This article by Mary D. Gaebler, visiting assistant professor of theological ethics at Gustavus Adolphus College, “Eros in Benedict and Luther,” from the Journal of Lutheran Ethics argues, “Lutherans, insofar as they derive their theology from Luther, should e Pope Benedict’s Encyclical, Deus Caritas Est. Luther, I think, would find this latest word from the Vatican surprisingly congenial.” (HT: Mirror of Justice)

One of Gaebler’s main goals is refuting the interpretation of Luther characterized by the work of Anders Nygren, which radically dichotomizes the concepts of agape and eros. She asks whether Luther “categorically” rejects “the kind of self-love that Benedict points to in his use of the term eros? There is much in Luther’s work to suggest that he does not. My own reading points to a more Catholic Luther on this matter of eros, particularly in his mature work.”

The crux of the argument is whether, as Benedict states, “Fundamentally ‘love’ is a single reality, but with different dimensions. At different times one or [an]other dimension may emerge more clearly. Yet when the two dimensions [eros and agape] are totally cut off from one another, the result is a caricature or at least an impoverished form of love.”

Whereas Nygren argues that Luther finds no legitimate place for erotic love, Gaebler says that in Luther’s later and mature theology (during and after the 1520s), “Here we see the very interesting conflation between caring for others on the one hand, and preserving one’s own life on the other. No longer does the earlier “either/or” duality define the character of an action. No longer a matter of either self or neighbor, now both neighbor and self are addressed in mand to protect life.”

The strict and radical opposition and separation of agape and eros and the characterization of the former as divine and the latter as merely sinful is simply untenable. You can find great evidence for erotic elements of divine love, I think, in the covenant language of the Old Testament and the corresponding concept of chesed, or covenant-love. The Puritans certainly place a lot of emphasis on this and biblical wedding imagery.

In conclusion, I’d like to pass along this bit from Jonathan Edwards that seems to agree with both Luther and Benedict on this point (contra Nygren). It is taken from his Miscellanies (no. 301) and is titled “Man’s Nature, Self-Love, and Sin”:

The best philosophy that I have met with of original sin and all sinful inclinations, habits and principles, undoubtedly is that of Mr. [Solomon] Stoddard’s, of this town of Northampton: that is, that it is self-love in conjunction with the absence of the image and love of God; that natural and necessary inclination that man has to his own benefit, together with the absence of the original righteousness; or in other words, the absence of that influence of God’s Spirit, whereby love to God and to holiness is kept up to that degree, that this other inclination is always kept in its due subordination. But this being gone, his self-love governs alone; and having not this superior principle to regulate it, breaks out into all manner of exorbitancies, and es in unnumerable cases a vile and odious disposition, and causes thousands of unlovely and hateful actions. There is nothing new put into the nature that we call sin, but only the same self-love that necessarily belongs to the nature working and influencing, without regulation from that superior that primitively belongs to our nature, and that is necessary in order to the harmonious existing of it. This natural and necessary inclination to ourselves without that governor and guide, will certainly without anything else produce, or rather will e, all those sinful inclinations which are in the corrupted nature of man.

Edwards’ relevant point for our discussion here is that self-love, or eros as defined by Nygren, is not in itself sinful, but es such when it is the only guiding principle and exceeds its natural bounds.

C.S. Lewis, in his discussion of eros, discusses the element of need that is manifest in this aspect of love. Of course, on one level, there is a reality of “need” that is apparent in agape as well, insofar as there is need for an object to love. This recognition of the unity of love, manifested in different aspects, whether agapic, erotic, filial, or other, has led me to think of the potential for use of the term agaperotic love.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Verse of the Day
  Commentary on Today's Verse   Commentary on 1 Corinthians 13:1-3   (Read 1 Corinthians 13:1-3)   The excellent way had in view in the close of the former chapter, is not what is meant by charity in our common use of the word, almsgiving, but love in its fullest meaning; true love to God and man. Without this, the most glorious gifts are...
Verse of the Day
  Commentary on Today's Verse   Commentary on Philippians 1:27-30   (Read Philippians 1:27-30)   Those who profess the gospel of Christ, should live as becomes those who believe gospel truths, submit to gospel laws, and depend upon gospel promises. The original word conversation denotes the conduct of citizens who seek the credit, safety, peace, and prosperity of their city. There is that in...
Verse of the Day
  John 1:32-34 In-Context   30 This is the one I meant when I said, 'A man who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.'   31 I myself did not know him, but the reason I came baptizing with water was that he might be revealed to Israel.   32 Then John gave this testimony: I saw the Spirit...
Verse of the Day
  Commentary on Today's Verse   Commentary on Proverbs 10:19   (Read Proverbs 10:19)   Those that speak much, speak much amiss. He that checks himself is a wise man, and therein consults his own peace.   Proverbs 10:19 In-Context   17 Whoever heeds discipline shows the way to life, but whoever ignores correction leads others astray.   18 Whoever conceals hatred with lying lips and spreads...
Verse of the Day
  1 John 4:20 In-Context   18 There is no fear in love. But perfect love drives out fear, because fear has to do with punishment. The one who fears is not made perfect in love.   19 We love because he first loved us.   20 Whoever claims to love God yet hates a brother or sister is a liar. For whoever does...
Differences Between Sephardic and Ashkenazi Kiddush Cups
Explore the differences between Sephardic and Ashkenazi Kiddush cups, focusing on historical context, design elements and cultural significance.
Verse of the Day
  James 4:1-3 In-Context   1 What causes fights and quarrels among you? Don't they come from your desires that battle within you?   2 You desire but do not have, so you kill. You covet but you cannot get what you want, so you quarrel and fight. You do not have because you do not ask God.   3 When you ask, you...
Bible Verse of the Day
  Daily Verse Reflection   Commentary on Proverbs 16:32   (Read Proverbs 16:32)   To overcome our own passions, requires more steady management, than obtaining victory over an enemy.   FAQs about the Daily Bible Verse   Why is reading a daily Bible verse important?   Reading a daily Bible verse helps you focus on God's word, offering spiritual guidance and encouragement for the day ahead.   How...
Verse of the Day
  Titus 3:4-7 In-Context   2 to slander no one, to be peaceable and considerate, and always to be gentle toward everyone.   3 At one time we too were foolish, disobedient, deceived and enslaved by all kinds of passions and pleasures. We lived in malice and envy, being hated and hating one another.   4 But when the kindness and love of God...
The Intersection of Christianity and Libertarianism
A brief summary of the article discussing the intersection of Christianity and libertarianism.
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved