Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY
/
After the culture wars
After the culture wars
Oct 4, 2024 5:21 AM

Review of Onward: Engaging the Culture without Losing the Gospel by Russell Moore (B&H Books, August 2015).

For much of its existence, America has been defined as an extension of the conservative Protestant values of its first settlers. That worldview is rapidly vanishing in America, and Russell Moore, president of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission, the policy arm of the Southern Baptist Church, says now is the time for the church to reclaim its mission.

“We were never given a mission to promote ‘values’ in the first place, but to speak instead of sin and of righteousness and judgement, of Christ and his kingdom,” writes Moore. His new book Onward: Engaging the Culture without Losing the Gospel offers a blueprint for how to speak to a culture that is not only indifferent to but also openly hostile to Christianity.

We’ve heard for decades that many younger leaders within the church have grown tired of cultural wars and a politicized Christianity, and Moore, in his mid-40s, certainly falls within this camp. Moore reminds us that “for those for whom everything is politics, claiming minority status seems nonsensical.”

Moore openly celebrates the end of civil religion and calls on the faithful to “embrace the freakishness” of the Gospel message because it is the “power unto salvation.” He often says that to be Christian means to believe strange things like “a previously dead man is going to show up in the sky, on a horse.”

Focusing on the strangeness and alien aspect of Christianity is a central focus for Moore. He likes to remind believers that because of the cross, Christianity started on the wrong side of history and that according to the world, the right side was the Roman Empire. For too long, cultural Christianity has watered down the Gospel witness and made Christians lazy. Moore believes it is essential for the church and believers to recapture the richness of their doctrine and orthodoxy before the culture can again be truly engaged and transformed.

Despite all that has been lost within the culture and the wasteland of spiritual and moral poverty scattered across the land, this is not a pessimistic message. Besides, Moore likes to say the next Billy Graham might be drunk right now and the next Mother Theresa might be a “heroin-addicted porn star.” Nor is it a surrender in any way to the culture which now demands pain and penalties for many who are unwilling to reimagine human sexuality and bow to the rising-tide secular worldview.

“In the short term, we have lost the culture war on sexual and family issues,” writes Moore. “Long-term, though, we ought to stand by our conviction that marriage and family are resilient because they are embedded into the fabric of creation and thus cannot be upended by cultural mores or by court decrees.”

Moore wants readers to embrace the prophetic minority voice, not think of themselves as the defunct remnant of the moral majority. Embracing that mission allows for the church and believers to offer greater clarity in the public square concerning issues like salvation and atonement and what that means for the human person and their life. Championing a generic God and country message for the public square was never enough Moore argues.

Moore offers an example of his ideal pastor in the church: “He is pro-life and pro-marriage, although he is likely to speak of issues like homosexuality in theological and pastoral terms rather than in rhetoric warning of the ‘the gay agenda.’” Moore is especially critical of groups like “Red Letter Christians” or professional church activists who demand of government and the taxpayer the work assigned to the church and private charities. They, too, damage the church’s witness and a holistic Gospel.

One of the most perilous issues in America today is religious liberty, and Moore, of course, offers a rigorous defense. He calls on the church to articulate exactly why religious liberty is important in the American Republic and to explain what happens without it, which history has repeatedly shown ends in violence and war. Moore is fond of echoing the thought of Christians throughout the centuries that freedom of conscience and religious liberty are essential reminders that the state is not ultimate.

“A state that can pave over the conscience— anyone’s conscience— without pelling interest in doing so, is a state that is unfettered to do virtually anything,” declares Moore.

Moore’s aggressive defense of religious liberty is essential, too, because it emphasizes his insistence on the church’s championing of evangelism. While the overly political church in promised the Gospel witness, Moore hopes the bludgeoning defeat within the culture wars allows the church to be vigorous again with evangelism. Undoubtedly, it’s important that the church focus on improving its witness and word within a fractured, decaying culture. “But our vote for president is less important than our vote to receive new members for baptism into our churches,” reminds Moore.

Emphasizing the strangeness of Christianity highlights the differences between it and the culture all the more. This is important because as the casualty list from a spiritually bankrupt culture continues to grow, so does the need for a message and Savior that will rescue them. Moore’s voice is powerful and relevant because he better than most recognizes this fact. He notes that “people who don’t want Christianity don’t want almost Christianity.” This is why he has the optimism to boldly declare and hope for an America that is not merely “post- Christian” but is a “pre-Christian” missionary field with a starving populace seeking meaning and fulfillment.

Moore’s Onward is a powerful reminder that the strongest voice and witness e from an emboldened and confident minority that is willing to cling to and declare the truth at any cost.

Ray Nothstine is a graduate of Asbury Theological Seminary and lives in North Carolina

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY
Lord Jonathan Sacks: The West’s Rabbi
In October 1798, the president of the United States wrote to officers of the Massachusetts militia, acknowledging a limitation of federal rule. “We have no government,” John Adams wrote, “armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, and revenge or gallantry, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net.” The nation that Adams had helped to found would require the parts of the body...
C.S. Lewis and the Apocalypse of Gender
From very nearly the beginning, Christianity has wrestled with the question of the body. Heretics from gnostics to docetists devalued physical reality and the body, while orthodox Christianity insisted that the physical world offers us true signs pointing to God. This quarrel persists today, and one form it takes is the general confusion among Christians and non-Christians alike about gender. Is gender an abstracted idea? Is it reducible to biological characteristics? Is it a set of behaviors determined by...
Spurgeon and the Poverty-Fighting Church
Religion & Liberty: Volume 33, Number 4 Spurgeon and the Poverty-Fighting Church by Christopher Parr • October 30, 2023 Portrait of Charles Spurgeon by Alexander Melville (1885) Charles Spurgeon was a young, zealous 15-year-old boy when he came to faith in Christ. A letter to his mother at the time captures the enthusiasm of his newfound Christian faith: “Oh, how I wish that I could do something for Christ.” God granted that wish, as Spurgeon would e “the prince of...
Conversation Starters with … Anne Bradley
Anne Bradley is an Acton affiliate scholar, the vice president of academic affairs at The Fund for American Studies, and professor of economics at The Institute of World Politics. There’s much talk about mon good capitalism” these days, especially from the New Right. Is this long overdue, that a hyper-individualism be beaten back, or is it merely cover for increasing state control of the economy? Let me begin by saying that I hate “capitalism with adjectives” in general. This...
Mistaken About Poverty
Perhaps it is because America is the land of liberty and opportunity that debates about poverty are especially intense in the United States. Americans and would-be Americans have long been told that if they work hard enough and persevere they can achieve their dreams. For many people, the mere existence of poverty—absolute or relative—raises doubts about that promise and the American experiment more generally. Is it true that America suffers more poverty than any other advanced democracy in the...
Up from the Liberal Founding
During the 20th century, scholars of the American founding generally believed that it was liberal. Specifically, they saw the founding as rooted in the political thought of 17th-century English philosopher John Locke. In addition, they saw Locke as a primarily secular thinker, one who sought to isolate the role of religion from political considerations except when necessary to prop up the various assumptions he made for natural rights. These included a divine creator responsible for a rational world for...
Jesus and Class Warfare
Plenty of Marxists have turned to the New Testament and the origins of Christianity. Memorable examples include the works of F.D. Maurice and Zhu Weizhi’s Jesus the Proletarian. After criticizing how so many translations of the New Testament soften Jesus’ teachings regarding material possessions, greed, and wealth, Orthodox theologian David Bentley Hart has gone so far to ask, “Are Christians supposed to be Communists?” In the Huffington Post, Dan Arel has even claimed that “Jesus was clearly a Marxist,...
Adam Smith and the Poor
Adam Smith did not seem to think that riches were requisite to happiness: “the beggar, who suns himself by the side of the highway, possesses that security which kings are fighting for” (The Theory of Moral Sentiments). But he did not mend beggary. The beggar here is not any beggar, but Diogenes the Cynic, who asked of Alexander the Great only to step back so as not to cast a shadow upon Diogenes as he reclined alongside the highway....
Creating an Economy of Inclusion
The poor have been the main subject of concern in the whole tradition of Catholic Social Teaching. The Catholic Church talks often about a “preferential option for the poor.” In recent years, many of the Church’s social teaching documents have been particularly focused on the needs of the poorest people in the world’s poorest countries. The first major analysis of this topic could be said to have been in the papal encyclical Populorum Progressio, published in 1967 by Pope...
How Dispensationalism Got Left Behind
Whether we like it or not, Americans, in one way or another, have all been indelibly shaped by dispensationalism. Such is the subtext of Daniel Hummel’s provocative telling of the rise and fall of dispensationalism in America. In a little less than 350 pages, Hummel traces how a relatively insignificant Irishman from the Plymouth Brethren, John Nelson Darby, prompted the proliferation of dispensational theology, especially its eschatology, or theology of the end times, among our ecclesiastical, cultural, and political...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2024 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved