Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Acton University: Why Fair Trade isn’t fair
Acton University: Why Fair Trade isn’t fair
Apr 26, 2025 12:40 AM

Imagine: You are in the grocery store, searching for the perfect bag of coffee- not too expensive, but still rich in flavor and good quality. As you are turning away with the coffee you have just chosen, there on the shelf is a bag of coffee with the Fair Trade logo. After an intense internal debate, you return the first bag of coffee to its shelf and take the Fair Trade coffee with a sense of contentment. The coffee farmers in third world countries are a little better off today because of your purchase. Right?

Economist Victor Claar shed light on this question in his talk at Acton University. He analyzed the stated purposes of Fair Trade, the state of Fair Trade today, and the results of the Fair Trade initiative. He began the lecture by explaining the coffee market to a classroom that included economists, an African coffee farmer, and other good-hearted citizens.

The economic decision associated with choosing coffee plants requires considerations of risk and reward, particularly for farmers of third world nations. As Claar explained, arabica coffee beans brew the best coffee and are thus favored by customers. Although they are more profitable for farmers to grow, they represent an economic risk, particularly for third world farmers. Arabica plants take several years to mature and are delicate and easily damaged.

In addition, coffee farmers face an even higher element of risk, one they cannot control: the wrath of Mother Nature. Claar explained in his lecture that “there are four reasons for a spike in the coffee market: One, bad weather in South America. Two, bad weather in South America. Three, bad weather in South America. And four, you guessed it, bad weather in South America.” The volatility of the coffee market means that many third world farmers rely heavily on a steady climate to determine the success or destruction of that year’s crop.

Given these factors, the Fair Trade initiative, which provides small-scale coffee farmers with direct access to the world market, seems to be a productive and charitable idea. Yet the World Fair Trade Organization is not all it seems to be.

Prior to the second half of the twentieth century, Brazil was the only major producer of coffee beans. The country used valorization to make a greater profit: the Brazilian government would burn a percentage of the crop in order to raise the prices of the heavily-demanded product. In the 1950s, Colombia emerged as a petitor in the coffee market. By the 1960s, enough nations were entering the coffee market, and employing destructive measures to make economic profit, that the United Nations intervened with the International Coffee Agreement of 1962. The ICA introduced maximum production ceiling for coffee for each participant country. Although the ICA has been ratified six times since its conception, Claar argued that, the Agreement essentially collapsed in the 1990s.

In the wake of the ICA, the World Fair Trade Organization appeared. Under the guise of a benevolent savior of the poverty-stricken coffee famers of the world, Fair Trade has been, in reality, a series of attempts to keep the poor farmers of third world nations in poverty.

There are several Fair Trade secrets that Claar employed to support this claim. Even “unfair” coffee may originate from Fair Trade farms. Some coffee bags and products e from Fair Trade farms do not have the logo to identify them.

Ironically, majority of Fair Trade es from wealthy nations, because they are able to pay the fees and make a profit to grow their farms. Fair Trade gives their suppliers an average of an extra $0.20 on the global average purchase price, but it is costly to join, and remain a member of, the Fair Trade network. The Fair Trade minimum that kicks in when the market bottoms out is just barely enough to pay the dues, but not enough to bring families out of poverty. This is where the World Fair Trade Organization truly does the opposite of what it is meant to do. Farmers on the poverty line make just enough money to remain a part of the network, but the annual Fair Trade fees keep the poor in poverty.

The initiative also utilizes social capital to further their profit. Fair Trade recognizes that, if they portray themselves as a charitable organization that helps pluck poor farmers out of destitution, the charity of the human heart will encourage coffee drinkers to buy products with the Fair Trade logo. The consumers will see this purchase as more than a cup of coffee, but an act of justice or charity aiding the poor farmers.

So what can we possibly do? Claar’s solution for the Acton University attendees is simple: when you find yourself in the coffee aisle, buy the brew you like best and that fits your budget. This conclusion was supported by an African coffee farmer who was an attendee of the lecture. The gentleman thanked Claar for revealing the truths about Fair Trade, stating that the hard working farmers of the world need the support of individuals around the world to buy their products. Organizations like Fair Trade do more harm than good for hard working farmers around the globe. So the next time you find yourself at the store for your next cuppa’ joe, follow both your heart and your wallet to find your favorite brew.

(Photo source: )

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Integral Human Development
The Journal of Markets & Morality is planning a theme issue for the Spring of 2013: “Integral Human Development,” i.e. the synthesis of human freedom and responsibility necessary for the material and spiritual enrichment of human life. According to Pope Benedict XVI, Integral human development presupposes the responsible freedom of the individual and of peoples: no structure can guarantee this development over and above human responsibility. (Caritas in Veritate 17) There is a delicate balance between the material and the...
Obamacare’s Religious Rubes
The White House has a plan to mobilize prayer vigils in front of the Supreme Court in defense of Obamacare. It was reported that the administration met with leaders at non-profit organizations and religious officials who support the new health care law. The court takes up the constitutional test of the health care mandate in a couple of weeks. The mandate has now been challenged in 26 states. Cue the same stale big government religious prophets who confuse statism and...
How to Steal a Bike in New York City
Edmund Burke didn’t really say it, but it still rings true: All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. In a test of this maxim, filmmaker Casey Neistat tries to steal his own bike in several locations around New York City and finds that most people do nothing about it—even when it’s done right in front of a police station. I recently spent a couple of days conducting a bike theft experiment, which...
Italy’s Tax Man Takes Aim at the Vatican
Kishore Jayabalan, the Acton Institute’s Rome office director, was interviewed by the Zenit news agency in an article titled, “Is Taxing the Church a Real Solution for Italy?” In the article, Jayabalan discusses the history of the Italian state and its imposition of property taxes on the Roman Catholic Church’s land holdings, residences and non-profit businesses. Sometimes in the past, particularly under Napoleonic rule and before the Lateran Pacts, the institution of property tax was often a subject of state...
Constitutional Cases and the Four Cardinal Virtues
Should virtue be a consideration in judicial decisionmaking? Indiana Law Professor R. George Wright makes an intriguing argument for why the four cardinal virtues could be useful in interpreting constitutional cases: Judges typically decide constitutional cases by referring to one or more legal precedents, rules, tests, principles, doctrines, or policies. This Article mends supplementing this standard approach with fully legitimate and appropriate attention to what many cultures have long recognized as the four basic cardinal virtues of practical wisdom or...
Lord Acton and the Power of the Historian
Looking through my back stacks of periodicals the other day I ran across a review in Books & Culture by David Bebbington, “Macaulay in the Dock,” of a recent biography of Thomas Babington Macaulay. The essay takes its point of departure in Lord Acton’s characterization of Macaulay as “one of the greatest of all writers and masters, although I think him utterly base, contemptible and odious.” As Bebbington writes, “Acton, a towering intellectual of the later 19th century, was at...
How to Love Liberty More Than a Libertarian Economist
I have a deep and abiding love for liberty—which is why I find myself so often in disagreement with libertarians. Libertarians love liberty too, of course, but they tend to love liberty a bit differently. I love liberty in an earthy, elemental way. I love liberty because I need it—like I need air and food—for human flourishing. In contrast, the libertarians I’ve encountered tend to love liberty primarily as an abstraction. Indeed, the most ideologically consistent libertarians I know seem...
Is Work a Curse?
Is work a curse, a result of mankind’s fall from grace? Not according to the Book of Genesis. As Hugh Whelchel, Executive Director of the Institute for Faith, Work & Economics, explains, what Adam was called to do in the garden is what we are still called to do in our work today: Humanity was created by God to cultivate and keep God’s creation, which included developing it and protecting it. You see, we were created to be stewards of...
Reagan, Whittaker Chambers, and the Threat to Freedom
Over at the Liberty Law Blog, there is an excellent post titled “Ronald Reagan, Whittaker Chambers, and the Dialogue of Liberty” by Alan Snyder. Snyder delves into the influence Chambers had on Reagan and how their worldviews differed as well. Many conservatives and scholars felt Chambers’ prediction that the West was on the losing side of history in the battle against Marxism collapsed after the fall of the Iron Curtain and the Soviet Union. For many, the ideas of Chambers...
Let’s Change Hearts and Minds (and Laws, Too)
Few clichés are so widespread within the evangelical subculture, says Matthew Lee Anderson, as the notion that our witness must be one of “changing hearts and minds.” In careful hands, the idea is at best ambiguous. At worst it reinforces the sort of interior-oriented individualism that allows for and perpetuates a blissful naivete about how institutions and structures shape our dispositions and thoughts. In less than careful hands, the phrase drives a wedge between law and culture by attempting to...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved