Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Acton Commentary: Government Health Care — Back to the Plantation
Acton Commentary: Government Health Care — Back to the Plantation
Apr 14, 2026 5:29 AM

Black leaders constantly remind Americans of our racism. Should not these same leaders protest the expansion of government control contained in the health-care reform bill currently working its way through Congress?

Here’s why. Notwithstanding their rhetoric of freedom and empowerment, many prominent black leaders appear content to send blacks back to the government plantation—where a small number of Washington elites make decisions for blacks who aren’t in the room. Why do minority leaders not favor alternatives that demonstrate faith in the intelligence and dignity of people to manage their own lives?

In a sermon at Howard University, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright reminded university students that, “Racism is alive and well. Racism is how this country was founded and how this country is still run.” During the presidential campaign, Wright explained to his parishioners that America is “a country and culture controlled by rich white people.” But if racists and “rich white people” control America, why do those sympathetic to Wright assume that those same people will look out for the health of blacks?

If Princeton religion professor Cornel West was right in his 2008 book, Hope on a Tight Rope, that “the very discovery that black people are human beings is a new one,” then shouldn’t blacks raise questions about centralizing health care decisions in a bureaucracy peopled by officials who are only recently cognizant of minorities’ humanity? “White brothers and sisters have been shaped by 244 years of white supremacist slavery, 87 years of white supremacist Jim and Jane Crow, and then another 40 years in which progress has been made” but “the stereotypes still cut deep,” West wrote. He admits “relative progress for a significant number of black people,” but warns that there has not been “some kind of fundamental transformation” in America. Dr. West asserts that “white supremacy is married to capitalism.” If that is true, then why would we want to set up a health-care system that strengthens the government sanction of health-care provision by businesses?

If Georgetown University sociology professor Michael Eric Dyson is correct about the current racial and structural injustice impeding poor blacks, then there is cause for concern. In response to Bill Cosby’s “conservative” reflections on black America in 2006, the Rev. Dr. Dyson wrote, “Cosby is hell bent on denying that race and structural forces play any role in the lives of the poor.” He continued by saying, “The plane of black progress lifts on the wings of personal responsibility and social justice.” If race and structural forces are at work against blacks, why not promote personal responsibility and justice by liberating them from dependence on those structures and putting them in a position to call their own shots?

If CNN analyst Roland Martin was right on February 18, 2009, when he said, “while everyone seems to be caught up in the delusion of a post-racial America, we cannot forget the reality of the racial America, where African-Americans were treated and portrayed as inferior and less than others,” then shouldn’t blacks be concerned about centralized health care, which will tether them ever more securely to a fundamentally corrupt political system? We cannot hope for change, after all: Martin insists that “the realities of race” are “being played out in munities each day,” and had earlier reminded us that when es to white racism blacks should “accept the fact that some people will not change” (September 10, 2008).

Many black leaders seem confused on this point. If America has a race problem, then it will manifest itself in both public and private sectors. Expanding Medicare and Medicaid only subjects poor blacks to more government control. Economic empowerment and returning health decisions to black people are the only way to eradicate concerns about structural injustice. When health-care pete for their patronage, blacks are empowered and control their own destinies. Economic freedom in health care is a moral and civil-rights issue because for too long blacks have suffered the indignity of having political structures make surrogate decisions about their bodies.

Black leaders should encourage policymakers to make health more affordable by giving individuals absolute control over their earnings with itant power to choose their own health plan. Instead, they are conspiring with Congress to lead us back to the plantation.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Audio: Samuel Gregg on Theresa May’s Election Blunder
On Friday afternoon, Acton Institute Director of Programs Samuel Gregg joins guest host Paul Kengor on Ave Maria Radio’s Kresta in the Afternoon to discuss the shocking results of last week’ssnap UK elections that saw Theresa May and the Tories lose their majority in the UK Parliament. Gregg looks at the coalitions likely to form as a result and the impact the election will have on the ing Brexit negotiations. You can listen to the interview via the audio player...
Explainer: How do French parliamentary elections work (and why was June 11 historic)?
On Sunday, France held the first round of its parliamentary elections. After the June 11, 2017, the nation is poised to usher in a new era of French political history. How is French Parliament divided? The French Parliament is divided into two houses: the National Assembly (Assemblée nationale) and the Senate (Sénat). The general public votes to elect members of the National Assembly, known as députés. The Senate is elected separately by grands électeurs, such as local elected officials. The...
When Lightning McQueen brought jobs to rural America
“Main street isn’t main street anymore. No one seems to need us like they did before.” Americans continue to face the violent winds of economic change, whether stemming from technology, trade, or globalization. Those pains have been particularly pronounced in rural areas, which the Wall Street Journal recently proclaimed as being the “new inner city” due to accelerating declines in key measures of “socioeconomic well-being.” In response to these trends, progressives and populists have been quick to turn to a...
Why truly free trade is also truly fair
Throughout our political discourse, we continue to hear critiques of free trade from left and right, each of them ultimately aiming to prod us closer toan abstract notion of so-called “fair” or “fairer” trade. Evenwhen the value of free trade is recognized, such admissions tend to be quickly panied by fuzzy, convoluted qualifiers, such as “free trade must also be fair.” It’s a refrain that sounds agreeable enough on the surface, yet it bears an underlying ambivalence toward freedom and...
What the flu can teach us about economics
Note: This is post #37 in a weekly video series on basic microeconomics. What can the flu teach us about economics? In this video, Alex Tabarrok of Marginal Revolution University explains how vaccines produce positive externalities that help people stay healthy. When someone receives the vaccine, they pass along the positive benefits of the vaccine to others, generating positive externalities (If you find the pace of the videos too slow, I’d mend watching them at 1.5 to 2 times the...
A Christian defense of capitalism
Humanity knows just two theoretical forms of organizing public interactions, says Alex Tokarev. All real socio-economic systems that have evolved through the centuries are a mix of the two opposite ideological concepts: One of the systems uses political coercion. The other is based on voluntary cooperation. One depends on a central plan. The other relies on individual initiative. One treats citizens as children who need motherly care from the cradle to the grave. The other recognizes people as autonomous creatures...
What did Alexis de Tocqueville actually think?
Honoré Daumier (French, 1808 – 1879 ), Alex. Ch. Henri de Tocqueville, 1849, lithograph, Rosenwald Collection Samuel Gregg, research director at the Acton Institute, recently published areview onthe new translation ofAlexis de Tocqueville’sRecollections: The French Revolution of 1848 and Its Aftermathin which Tocqueville, the “quintessential man of theory,” gets dirty aboutthepolitics of the French Revolution. Why would the man whowrote bothDemocracy in America(1835, 1840) andThe Old Regime and the Revolution(1856) write an explicit reflectionon hispolitical interactions? To answer, Gregg directly...
How will tax reform affect charitable giving?
In April the Trump administration released the president’s tax-reform proposal (see: Explainer: What you should know about President Trump’s tax reform plan). The plan was merely an outline and was short on details. Republicans in Congress, though, have released proposals that include three major policy changes: (1) increasing the value of the standard deduction to $11,000 for individuals and $22,000 for married couples, (2) extending the charitable tax deduction to non-itemizers, and (3) decreasing the highest marginal tax rate to...
Bernie Sanders imposes a religious test for public office
This week the U.S. Senate held a hearing in which an explosive revelation was made that threatens to undermine the Constitution. And no, I’m not talking about the Comey hearing (that was rather a dud). I’m referring to the confirmation hearing for the deputy director of the Office of Management and Budget. You probably didn’t hear much about that hearing, or the nominee, Russel Vought. And you likely wouldn’t have heard about it still if Bernie Sanders hadn’t decided to...
5 things you need to know about the UK’s 2017 general election
The UK’s 2017 general election: What you need to know. The future of UK politics, Brexit negotiations, and transatlantic values has been thrust into uncertainty following the UK snap election on Thursday night. The hung Parliament will require a coalition, but the Conservative Party’s most likely partner will seek concessions on Brexit and possibly on social issues. Here are the facts you need to know: Theresa May lost seats but will remain prime minister – for now. Prime Minister Theresa...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved