Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Acton alumni spotlight: Justin Beene – Developing community and seeking justice
Acton alumni spotlight: Justin Beene – Developing community and seeking justice
Mar 26, 2026 5:36 PM

Justin Beene is the director of the Grand Rapids Center for Community Transformation and long-time faculty member of Acton University. He has spoken munity development and poverty several times at Acton events. You can hear his AU talk, “Community and Economic Development,” by clicking the button at the bottom of this interview.

I’ve long admired Justin and the work he’s engagedin. Recently, I had the chance to ask Justin several questions about Acton, his work, and the current cultural upheaval we have experienced here in the United States. Our exchange is below.

Andrew Vanderput: What was your first introduction to the Acton Institute? How did it impact your thinking?

Justin Beene:I was first introduced to Acton by Rudy Carrasco, a faculty [member] at AU. I was in my second graduate program — the first was in Management of Human Services/Social Work, and I was dissatisfied with the lack of conversation on economics and faith when it came munity development. I decided to attend Grand Rapids Theological Seminary to learn how to better engage my faith with the dire economic situation I was seeing in munities around the world. Rudy was a guest professor who asked me after the class, “Where are you learning about free market economics, faith, and munities?” I didn’t have a great answer, and I probably cited Social Stanford Innovation Review or something, but he told me e check Acton University. Within two years [of 2014], I was asked to teach a course on Community and Economic Development and have been doing so ever since.

​AV:What led you to establishthe Grand Rapids Center for Community Transformation (GRCCT)?

JB:In 2014 after getting back from Guatemala City, where I spent 7 months studying Transformational Leadership with a Focus in Entrepreneurship for the Global City, a report came out from Forbes that said Grand Rapids was the second-worst city in the U.S. for African Americans to live in terms of economics (entrepreneurship, median e, and home ownership).

Unfortunately, for me this provided some validation from my lived experience as a man of color and the opportunities I saw for people who looked like me. However, my frustration went beyond this single study — Forbes had also often ranked Grand Rapids as one of the best places to retire, invest in real estate, and one of the top most munities in the country. How did we have so many great things about this city juxtaposed with it being one of the worst places to live for African Americans? I began asking myself what it would look like if I took my faith, passion for business, and heart for munities and created a collaborative in which churches, nonprofits, and for profits might be co-located and work together under a single vision and mission.

In 2015, the GR Center for Community Transformation was birthed and ultimately now holds Bethany Christian Services Youth and Community Programs, NAACP-GR, GR Nehemiah Project and two social enterprises, Rising Grinds Café and Building Bridges Professional Services. Collectively, we are “creating opportunities for transformation.”

AV: There are many nonprofits in munity you are seeking to serve. How would you say GRCCT is different?

JB:Well, first off, GRCCT isn’t a nonprofit; its simply the name of our building and the movement the individual nonprofits and for-profits mitted to. That’s unique in and of itself, in that we intentionally sought to not create another nonprofit, that’s the last thing I think the Grand Rapids needs, and instead we are co-creating a platform of transformation.

Additionally, the whole idea behind the GR Center for Community Transformation was to bring people together in a radically inclusive way. The Harvard Business Review stated the idea this way, “If the goal is big enough, ambitious, and transformational, people will put aside their differences and work together … the challenge is to build a positive coalition that is more powerful than the negative coalition” (Martin & Osberg, 2015, p. 3). That’s what we are trying to do — to create a physical space in which all e here enter into a transformative process that draws them back again — to work here, volunteer, invest, participate, ultimately being part of the change we desire to see in the city.

Further, we actually try not to use the language of “service” anymore. Unfortunately, it can e a patronizing word — those “with” helping those “without.” The reality is that we all are in need and we all have strengths. Lila Watson said it this way: “If you e here to help me you are wasting your time, but if you e here because you believe that your liberation is tied to mine, then let us begin.” We are about the growth and transformation of everyone — employees, investors, board members, youth, and residents. And we increasingly finding out how valuable this approach is during a time such as now.

At GRCCT we believe that real transformation happens at the pace of deep relationships. It’s when the real me meets the real you, over and over again. So, I think our innovation is that we are creating a place that moves beyond “business as usual” or “programs” to one of “presence.” A place that naturally invites each person to be fully themselves and do so in an economically viable way.

Even more, the transformative process we engage in is one of Action, Reflection, and then Discernment. It’s a cycle in which one informs the other. Most organizations and enterprises are very busy doing stuff — stuck in the Action phase. We have created regular rhythms into our work life that allow for reflecting on our work, and discerning together what it means for us in the future.

I think because we have been absorbing such a vast array of reflections, innovations, relationships, and entrepreneurial idea from a variety of people engaged in this movement — we have a unique ability to speak authentically and passionately to many different people.

AV: In your experience, what role does work,entrepreneurship, and generosityplay munity development?

JB: Well, I think all play a critical role — most importantly the opportunityto work, and theprivilegeone might have to be around or exposed to other business leaders and entrepreneurs. These are all things that many of us have taken for granted and in a time like now we are reminded of how much we enjoy our freedoms.

Nonetheless, munities have never fully been provided the same access, opportunity, and privilege to engage in the same fruitful economic activity. That’s what makes systemic work so difficult: You are trying to undo years of denied access that many munities had from engaging in the economic and wealth-generating systems. So, generosity and philanthropy are needed — but they can never be a substitute for justice, access, entrepreneurship and the grit and hard work that must be panied by all of these. Dr. [Martin Luther] King said, “Philanthropy mendable, but it must not cause the philanthropist to overlook the circumstances of economic injustice which make philanthropy necessary.”

At GRCCT we are seeking to engage all of these things: leveraged philanthropy for wealth creation, entrepreneurship for increased economic activity, and providing young people with mentors who walk with them as they work hard to e obstacles.

AV: Our city of Grand Rapids has a history of racial inequity. We experienced a series of protests and riots in the wake of George Floyd’s death. What would your advice be to someone who wants to thoughtfully pursue racial reconciliation and justice in our country?

JB: So, I think the word “reconciliation” is a bit misleading — it presupposes there was a time in American history where there was racial cohesion, and unfortunately that has never been the case. So, learning history es the first and most essential — not African or Asian or Latin or Native American history — but learning “our” history. Until the majority culture identifies with the totality of history being our shared collective, it is hard to move forward together. Some of the deep understanding of history all requires each of us to examine ourselves. We have to be willing to e self-aware; in fact self-awareness is a prerequisite of formation. Otherwise we end up doing more violence to munity we are seeking peace for — or in summarizing Richard Rohr we will transmit the wounds we don’t transform.

I see this transmission of wounds ever-present in munity; despite the wealth of Grand Rapids, many of munities, munities all over the world, are being severely eroded by ever-increasing strong institutions and strength of short-term social services and philanthropy (Lupton, 2012; Perkins, 2005). Specifically, West Michigan’s dominant social service, religious giving, and global influence can actually hurt local and munities more than help them. The resulting oppressive dependency of what Lupton (2005) calls “toxic charity” was also prophetically described in (McKnight, 1995) in the opening of The Careless Society: Community and its Counterfeits.He asks:

How is it that America has e so dispirited? The sense of social disarray is pervasive: families collapsing, schools failing, violence spreading, medical systems out of control, justice systems overwhelmed, prisons burgeoning, human services degenerating, and surveys and studies everywhere indicating the loss of faith of Americans in their basic institutions.(p. ix)

Decades ago, McKnight (1995) goes on to argue that society’s problems are not that there are ineffective service-producing institutions but rather that the social service producing institutions are too powerful and increasingly create weak or munities. Today, we are seeing the result of years of bad posture, policy, and practice. We must face this reality and make adjustments.

Secondly, its engagement. Relationships are built before you need them, so it’s important to intentionally put yourself around people like you, not like you, and who don’t like you and learn their story, see their humanity. This can be done in all kinds of ways — from listening into Zoom calls or services across faiths and denominations, to showing up at meetings with groups that differ in opinion. Show up and build relationships, listen, don’t try to be at the center, and no need to be the hero.

Finally, as we have to take intentional action. Personally, my chosen area is that of entrepreneurship and economic development — it’s trying to utilize the existing economic systems to create wealth and provide opportunity for those who have historically been left out of its participation. So, strategically I have been encouraging people to look at their businesses, churches, or nonprofits and see if they are buying from local minority-owned businesses. Are they hiring people of color, shopping at local businesses, and purchasing services from historically marginalized and fully capable panies?

AV: What hope do you have for munity? For our country?

JB: This year sure is an apocalyptic year — meaning a year of revealing. We are learning who is essential and who is not, we are uncovering plots, misinformation, and scandals. But my hope is that we keep listening and act — not just “hope” that things will get better, but gain a collective sense of hope in our humanity — that together we can, have, and will continue to make a difference. But it does take work!

My hope is to see a munity — one in which continued personal growth, financial security, and flourishing is happening for everyone. It’s where there is more transparency and there is a sense of mutuality between people, where we are able to recognize and celebrate our differences and diversity. It’s where those who are the most vulnerable (kids and the elderly) are able to play safely in local parks, have homes that are affordable and are lead free, economic mobility, and relationships that cross traditional boundaries.

Listen to Justin’s AU Talk: “Community and Economic Development”

Click Here To Listen

Institute.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Chilean Model of Integral Development Visits the Vatican
The President of Chile, Sebastián Piñera, visited Pope Benedict XVI in the Vatican yesterday, and the Vatican’s daily newspaper L’Osservatore Romano carried a front-page article by Piñera on “Economic Development and Integral Development,” a theme of great interest to us at Acton and the subject of our current conference series Poverty, Entrepreneurship and Integral Development. Chile is justly famous for its acceptance of free-market economics through the influence of the “Chicago Boys” who studied under Milton Friedman and others at...
Archbishop Chaput: The American experience and global religious liberty
A brilliant assessment of where we are. (HT: American Orthodox Institute Observer). Subject to the governor of the universe: The American experience and global religious liberty March 1, 2011 – Most Rev. Charles J. Chaput, O.F.M. Cap., Archbishop of Denver, addressed the Berkley Center for Religion, Peace and World Affairs at Georgetown University. A friend once said – I think shrewdly — that if people want to understand the United States, they need to read two documents. Neither one is...
Intergenerational Injustice and a Question on Taxation
Jordan Ballor has already done a fine job menting on A Call for Intergenerational Justice, and I’m sure that others will be chiming in on the PowerBlog as well. I’d like to focus on a couple of points that stand out to me from an initial reading of the document. I suppose it says something about a document when you can’t finish reading the title without alarm bells going off. “Intergenerational Justice” is a fine sounding term, but what does...
International Aid and Integral Human Development
International aid e in for a lot of criticism recently and with the debate on the federal budget just beginning, U.S. funding for aid is on the chopping block. With a rising deficit, and a struggling economy, many are asking why the United States chooses to continue funding international, or foreign, aid. People of faith are often caught in the middle of the debate on whether international aid should or shouldn’t be cut, along with the role the state should...
More Thoughts on ‘A Call for Intergenerational Justice’
I posted some initial thoughts on “A Call for Intergenerational Justice: A Christian Proposal on the American Debt Crisis,” which was released by the Center for Public Justice and Evangelicals for Social Action yesterday. I’ve been engaged in what I think are largely helpful conversations on this document in a number of venues in the meantime. Gideon Strauss challenged me to look at the document again, and reconsider my criticisms, and I have been happy to do so. For instance,...
Taking His Name in Vain: What Would Jesus Cut?
Ray’s post pointed to something that’s been bugging me about Jim Wallis’ “What Would Jesus Cut?” campaign. As with the “What Would Jesus Drive?” campaign (“Transportation is a moral issue.” What isn’t these days?), Wallis’ campaign assumes the moral high ground by appropriating the Holy Name of Jesus Christ to advance his highly politicized, partisan advocacy. Jesus es an advertising slogan. And what is implicit here is that those who oppose Wallis are somehow at odds with the Gospel of...
Call of the Entrepreneur Website Redesigned
Now is a great time to check out Acton’s first documentary, The Call of the Entrepreneur. Call of the Entrepreneur's new design. The website has pletely redesigned to be more user friendly and attractive. You will find links to social media forCall of the Entrepreneur as well as options to share the documentary with your friends at the bottom of the site. We’ve also added the high definition trailer to the site. The only trailer available on the previous website...
Audio: Dr. Carl Trueman on Christians and Politics
If you weren’t able to make it to Derby Station on Wednesday for our latest Acton On Tap event, have no fear: we’re pleased to present the full recording of the evening’s festivities featuring Dr. Carl Trueman of Westminister Seminary via the audio player below. If you’re unfamiliar with Dr. Trueman or his work, check out Jordan Ballor’s introduction right here. Considering that the PowerBlog’s focus over the past few days has been on how Christians are approaching the debt...
A Response to ‘What Would Jesus Cut?’
Jim Wallis and a number of other Christians involved in politics are trying to gain attention for the question, “What would Jesus cut?” The answer to this question is supposed to be as obvious as it is in other moral contexts. For example, would Jesus lie about the useful life of a refrigerator he was selling for Best Buy? No way. Would he bully a kid into giving away his lunch money? Not a chance. Would you find him taking...
Jesus as Budget Director?
My first reaction to “What Would Jesus Cut?” is that it tends to reduce Christ to a distributor of material goods through government programs. Jesus is not a budget overseer or a dispenser of government largesse. Sojourners founder Jim Wallis has already countered this accusation with his own post saying, “We haven’t been trying to get Jesus to be the head of any mittee, or think that he would ever want that job!” But still, to use Christ as an...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved