Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Abraham-Parousia: Part 3 of Kuyper’s ‘Common Grace’ Now Available
Abraham-Parousia: Part 3 of Kuyper’s ‘Common Grace’ Now Available
Mar 22, 2026 4:14 AM

Christian’s Library Presshas now released the third part in its series of English translationsof Abraham Kuyper’s most famous work,Common Grace, a three-volume work of practical public theology. This release,Abraham-Parousia, is the third and final part of Volume 1: The Historical Section, following Part 1 (Noah-Adam) and Part 2 (Temptation-Babel).

Common Grace (De gemeene gratie)was originally published in 1901-1905 while Kuyper was prime minister. This new translation offers modern Christians a great resource for understanding the vastness of the gospel message, as well as their proper role in public life. The project is a collaboration between theActon InstituteandKuyper College.

Whereas the first two parts of Volume 1 focus on “what mon to our entire race”—stretching from Adam and Eve to Babel—in the final part of the Historical Section, Kuyper now sets his sights on the story of Abraham, where “the channel suddenly narrows” and the “world stage shrinks to Palestine and the human race to Israel.”

Butalthoughthe Bible begins to focus “almost exclusively on Abraham’s seed,” Kuyper is quick to caution against turning this“seeming disproportionality” intosome kind of lopsided particularism. For Kuyper, reading the Bible in such a way has led tothe false notion that “the fate of the nations and the importance of the world are of lesser concern to us,” and that missions (etc.) “do not rise to a higher vantage point than to save souls from the masses of the nations and to transfer them into the particularist sheep pen.”

Such warnings don’t diminish the power of particular grace. On the contrary, by ignoring its foundation in mon grace,” we will only dilute and disempower it:

This should not be understood to mean that we argue for catechism classes and preaching that would not make the introduction to particular grace its main task. Rather, ment intends to say that particular grace is treated too much in isolation while neglecting its foundation in mon grace” and its ultimate goal: the salvation of the world that was created, maintained, and never abandoned by God. The sad consequence of this error is: that “particular grace” floats in the air; the salvation of our soul is dissociated from our position and our life in the world; the floodgates open for the influx of Jewish particularism; and our Christian people are hindered from arriving at a thoroughly sound, truly Christian world- and lifeview that impassions their faith and steels their resilience…

…God therefore does not withdraw from the world when he calls Abraham, in order to consider henceforth the rest of the world as superfluous and only the Jewish people as humanity proper. From the beginning God is focused on the salvation of the world, and Abraham’s call stands in the service of that salvation. The setting apart of Abraham and the emergence of the Jewish people take place only as an instrument toward the realization of that high goal. This cannot be understood in any other way than that during the centuries of preparation for our salvation that lay between Abraham and Bethlehem, God the Lord was definitely involved with the nations in order to put them in the position in which they had to be in order to be able to receive the Christ.

Proceeding from here, Kuyper exploresthe implications from the storyof Abraham on through the Day of the Lord. “What will arrive at the parousia is not the beginning but pletion of this restoration,” Kuyper writes. “All of this together is aimed at saving the honor of what God created, and one day making his entire creation excel again in organic unity.”

For more, purchaseAbraham-Parousia, and order the other two parts of Volume 1: Noah-Adamand Temptation-Babel.

For updates on the series, follow theAbraham Kuyper Translation Project onFacebookand followChristian’s Library PressonFacebook,Twitter, and viamailing list.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
It’s Not Enough to Care About ‘The Poor’
“Each of us has a personal responsibility to heed the call to care for the poor,” says Jennifer A. Marshall. “The Bible doesn’t leave us room to make poverty someone else’s problem.” Long before LBJ’s call bat poverty, Christians heard a higher call passion for the poor. How to live out that mand in the context of 21st-century America is the challenge. And it’s one that thinkers such asSherman, author of the bookKingdom Calling: Vocational Stewardship for the Common Good,have...
Samuel Gregg On The War On Poverty: ‘Pass More Laws And Throw More Dollars At The Problem’
In today’s National Review Online, leading economists are asked ment on the 50th anniversary of Lyndon Johnson’s “War on Poverty.” Acton’s Director of Research, Sam Gregg, weighs in: As we know now, Johnson’s offensive against poverty did not have the impact envisaged by its progenitors. By the early 1970s, the failure was stark. Even today, this failure remains Exhibit A for the ineffectiveness of government intervention when confronting many economic problems. Not that this has led to any major rethinking...
At-A-Glance: Public Vs. Private Sector Health Care
The Washington Examiner has published a chart that clearly lays out the difference between Obamacare versus private sector health care. Using Walmart as an example (despite the employer’s much-disparaged employee benefits), Elliot Smilowitz at the Examiner shows that the private sector is able to parable health care at much less expense than Obamacare. ...
Taxpayer-Funded Abortions And Obamacare
Today, Professor Helen Alvaré of George Mason University, testified before the House Judiciary Committee mittee on the Constitution and Civil Justice regarding taxpayer-funded abortions under Obamacare. Alvaré, who teaches family law, law and religion, and property law, states that Americans have never understood abortion as a “good,” and that abortion cannot be labeled health care. The video below is her testimony. ...
By the Numbers: The War on Poverty
Fifty years ago today, President Lyndon B. Johnson gave his 1964 State of the Union Speech, in which he launched the ‘war on poverty.’ Within four years of that speech, the Johnson administration enacted a broad ran of programs, including the the Job Corps, Upward Bound, Head Start, the Neighborhood Youth Corps, the Social Security amendments creating Medicare/Medicaid, the creation of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and over a dozen others. Here are a few numbers related to...
Fatherlessness and the War on Poverty
In addition to reading Joe Carter’s striking by-the-numbers piece on the War on Poverty, and in keeping with Sam Gregg’s reflections on the deeper social and cultural forces at work, I heartily mend taking in Josh Good’s excellent retrospective in AEI’sThe American. Leveraging a lengthy quote from Herman Bavinck’s The Christian Family, one I’ve put to use myself, Good notes the “inverse impact of changing family structure on productive work and a flourishing economy”: The fact is, poverty is not...
Book Review: ‘The New School’ by Glenn Harlan Reynolds
Book information: The New School: How the Information Age Will Save American Education from Itself by Glenn Harlan Reynolds. Jackson, TN: Perseaus Books, 2013. Pp. viii + 106. Paperback. $21.50. Instapundit’s Glenn Harlan Reynolds’ The New School: How the Information Age Will Save American Education from Itself is a clear and succinct, yet thorough, essay on creative destruction and American education. This slim volume (only about 100 pages) is divided approximately into 50 pages on higher education, 25 on secondary...
The Bond of Fellowship
I was reading an essay that I found in an old book I bought in Vermont. Dr H.J. Laski (Oxford and Yale) wrote, “The less obvious the differences between men in the gain of living, the greater the bond of fellowship between them.” In other words the less we talk about differences between the rich and poor, the better we will all like each other and get along. In the Depression which began as he was writing, nearly everyone was...
Whom Would Jesus Indebt?
Putting ourselves and our children further in debt, notes Timothy Dalrymple, is not the way to help the poor: One of the great difficulties of this issue, for Christians, is that the morality of spending and debt has been so thoroughly demagogued that it’s impossible to advocate cuts in government spending without being accused of hatred for the poor and needy. A group calling itself the “Circle of Protection” recently promoted a statement on “Why We Need to Protect Programs...
Is the $17 Trillion Federal Debt Immoral?
Even when we agree on what Biblical principles should guide our political choices, evangelicals from the left and right rarely agree on policy solutions. But there is one area where there appears to be an increasingly significant level of agreement: the immorality of our national debt. At Christianity Today, David P. Gushee — an ethicist and politically progressive evangelical — explains why the $17 trillion national debt is both immoral and unwise: Most progressive evangelicals who address government spending focus...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved