Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
A tale of two hypothetical presidents
A tale of two hypothetical presidents
Jan 14, 2026 2:42 AM

Imagine a president who regularly steps on his own shoelaces and seems to waste power. This president inspires an especially venomous reaction from the press. They actually have contempt for him. He repeatedly harms his own agenda by violating established norms with little regard for the negative impact of doing so. The institution of the presidency relies significantly on a reserve of social and cultural capital built up over the two plus centuries of its existence. My hypothetical president shows little concern for the consequences of depleting that capital. The result is likely to be, at a minimum, that he will have difficulty pushing his agenda forward.

Despite this situation, such a presidency can be a boon to the nation. Readers may need to stop and wipe the coffee off of their screens. Let me repeat: such a presidency can be a boon.

Let us now imagine an alternate scenario. Conjure up the image of a leader who is urbane and an intellectual. This person understands how to manipulate the levers of power to achieve the results he/she may desire. Further, this person has an ambitious dream of shaping policy to bring about a more just and verdant world and believes that an enlightened will is all that is necessary to bring it about. One might recall a significant candidate of the past who famously claimed that “political will is a renewable resource,” thus implying that we need only to want something to happen badly enough in order to bring it about.

This alternative leader, cultured and intellectual in nature, presents a substantial threat to the well-being of American enterprise. While the first president will likely continue to make headlines with tweets and push little actual policy, the alternative president would inspire admiration by many for good temperament and theoretical sophistication and would successfully make big changes. The problem with this alternative president is that he/she would likely privilege moral satisfaction over the actual flourishing of the American people and the economy upon which they depend.

Consider an issue such as the corporate tax. Our alternative president would likely view an increase in the corporate tax (which is already petitive) as a successful blow for social justice which would produce greater redistribution of wealth. Certainly, there would be academics to say so. In addition, our alternative chief would believe that many regulations dictating conditions to functioning businesses would all produce greater justice at little cost. The social planners would likely provide promises that it is so. While elites have largely abandoned the idea of government owning and operating most types of enterprises, they have found it much simpler to dictate conditions with little accountability on the state’s end.

Counter to many expectations, when our uncouth es into office, the stock market roars and even sophisticated Wall Streeters cautiously admit that he may be good for business. Is it his extremely fine economic mind? Is it his ability to set people at ease with his perfect manners and smooth rhetoric? No. These things are missing. But he has one quality they find highly reassuring.

He does not seem to agree with the highly refined geniuses who look upon businesses as a giant lemon which can be squeezed this way and that so as to bring about a quasi-paradise. This galoot does not believe that wages can simply be dictated and the payroll departments can be told to radically re-organize the way they’ve done business for years. He has been in business and knows that the regulatory hit could be even more damaging than high taxes. He is a schlub, but a practical one in many ways. Let’s say he has a street-level intuition about the limits of bureaucracy.

This first president, the one who doesn’t cut a fine figure in suits and resembles eccentric characters from the world of fiction, isn’t going to get much done. That’s okay. Some of his ideas are probably not great and are better left on a campaign website. For some, that is a bad thing. But it also happens that many think he won’t achieve political goals…and THAT is a good thing.

President number one is not very good at making the engine of government hum, but we may discover that such a quality is a feature and not a bug. When es to growing the state, Americans may find that they prefer an amateur to a pro.

Photo: Public Domain, tpsdave

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Audio: Gregg on Obamacare at the Supreme Court
This week has seen some pretty substantial Constitutional drama unfold in the chambers of the United States Supreme Court as the constitutionality of President Obama’s signature legislative plishment is put to the test. Relevant Radio host Drew Mariani called upon Acton’s Director of Research, Dr. Samuel Gregg, to give his thoughts on the course of the arguments so far and his thoughts on how Catholic social teaching applies to the issue of health care in general. The interview lasts about...
How “Free-Market Roads” Can Restrict Freedom
In a political climate dominated by debates about individual mandates and restrictions on religious freedoms, an issue like road privatization isn’t likely to be on the top of anyone’s list of major concerns. But theexcellent post on “The Mirage of Free-Market Roads” byTimothy B. Lee, a writer with Ars Technica and the Cato Institute, is worth reading even if you don’t care about toll roads. Leeprovides an intriguing example of why we need to think clearly about how we apply...
Video: Business as Mission 2.0
If you weren’t able to attend last week’s Acton Lecture Series event here at Acton’s Grand Rapids office, we’ve got you covered. we’re pleased to present video of Rudy Carrasco’s lecture, entitled “Business as Mission 2.0,” below. ...
Samuel Gregg: The Left Resumes Its War on History
On The American Spectator, Acton Research Director Samuel Gregg examines how the left wages “a war of rejection and rationalization against whatever contradicts their mythologies.” Which explains why leftists get into a snit when you point out factual details like how Communist regimes “imprisoned, tortured, starved, experimented upon, enslaved, and exterminated millions” throughout the 20th century. And it makes it so much harder to wear that Che Guevara t-shirt without being mocked in public. Gregg: Overall, the left has been...
Morlino: Religious Freedom Defended with Charity and Reason
Yesterday in his personal column for the Diocese of Madison’s Catholic Herald, Bishop Robert C. Morlino issued a call to arms to Catholics battling for their religious freedom. But such a battle, he says, is one that should emulate Christ’s loving nature, while being resolutely clear and firm in rejecting the obligation of Catholic institutions to provide healthcare that includes contraceptives and abortifacients under the Obama administration’s controversial HHS mandate(see recent reactions below on EWTN by U.S. bishops and Acton’s...
Reply to George McGraw and Catholic World News on ‘The Right to Water’
Thanks to George McGraw, Executive Director of DigDeep Right to Water Project, for his kind and thoughtful Counterpoint to my original post. He and his organization are clearly dedicated to the noble cause of providing clean water and sanitation to all, a cause which everyone can and should support. It is also a very sensible objective that would aid the world’s poor much more than trendier causes such as “climate change” and “population control” which tend to view the human...
The Reformed Journal and the Grand Rapids Intellectuals
The fine folks at Cardus, the noteworthy thinktank north of the border, have posted a review of The Best of the Reformed Journal. John Schmalzbauer, who teaches in the Department of Religious Studies at Missouri State University where he holds the Blanche Gorman Strong Chair in Protestant Studies, concludes about the situation sixty years after the founding of the Reformed Journal: Though the surnames remain the same, American politics has changed. Defending Franklin Roosevelt, Lester DeKoster once wrote that “laissez...
Why Our Struggling Economy Needs More Entrepreneurship
Harvard economics professor Edward Glaeser explains why entrepreneurs are important for our struggling economy: In every year since 1989, panies have created more net jobs than the economy as a whole, which means that panies are, on average, destroying more jobs than they create. In 2009, the latest year for which we have data, new businesses created 2.33 million jobs, while older businesses destroyed, on net, more than 7 million jobs. The share of Americans working in startups has fallen...
Marital Status and the Social Safety Net
“Unless incentives suddenly stopped mattering during this recession, saysCasey B. Mulligan, an economics professor at the University of Chicago, “it appears that the expanding social safety net explains some of the excess nonemployment among unmarried women who are heads of households.” An unintended but unavoidable consequence of providing someone a cushion when they are without work is that they are provided with less incentive to get back to work. By definition, married women have husbands and unmarried women do not,...
Obamacare Lets the Government Decide What’s Moral
“The state’s appetite to find solutions from the center lures it to create positive rights out of thin air,” says Ismael Hernandez, president and founder of the Freedom and Virtue Institute, “even at the expense of a narrower space for civil society.” prehensive nature of religious thought often tempts religious bodies mand society from the center. Their tendency is to suffuse the system with a holistic vision of reality because such vision is seen as true and good. A social...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved