Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
A tale of two hypothetical presidents
A tale of two hypothetical presidents
Mar 3, 2026 10:01 AM

Imagine a president who regularly steps on his own shoelaces and seems to waste power. This president inspires an especially venomous reaction from the press. They actually have contempt for him. He repeatedly harms his own agenda by violating established norms with little regard for the negative impact of doing so. The institution of the presidency relies significantly on a reserve of social and cultural capital built up over the two plus centuries of its existence. My hypothetical president shows little concern for the consequences of depleting that capital. The result is likely to be, at a minimum, that he will have difficulty pushing his agenda forward.

Despite this situation, such a presidency can be a boon to the nation. Readers may need to stop and wipe the coffee off of their screens. Let me repeat: such a presidency can be a boon.

Let us now imagine an alternate scenario. Conjure up the image of a leader who is urbane and an intellectual. This person understands how to manipulate the levers of power to achieve the results he/she may desire. Further, this person has an ambitious dream of shaping policy to bring about a more just and verdant world and believes that an enlightened will is all that is necessary to bring it about. One might recall a significant candidate of the past who famously claimed that “political will is a renewable resource,” thus implying that we need only to want something to happen badly enough in order to bring it about.

This alternative leader, cultured and intellectual in nature, presents a substantial threat to the well-being of American enterprise. While the first president will likely continue to make headlines with tweets and push little actual policy, the alternative president would inspire admiration by many for good temperament and theoretical sophistication and would successfully make big changes. The problem with this alternative president is that he/she would likely privilege moral satisfaction over the actual flourishing of the American people and the economy upon which they depend.

Consider an issue such as the corporate tax. Our alternative president would likely view an increase in the corporate tax (which is already petitive) as a successful blow for social justice which would produce greater redistribution of wealth. Certainly, there would be academics to say so. In addition, our alternative chief would believe that many regulations dictating conditions to functioning businesses would all produce greater justice at little cost. The social planners would likely provide promises that it is so. While elites have largely abandoned the idea of government owning and operating most types of enterprises, they have found it much simpler to dictate conditions with little accountability on the state’s end.

Counter to many expectations, when our uncouth es into office, the stock market roars and even sophisticated Wall Streeters cautiously admit that he may be good for business. Is it his extremely fine economic mind? Is it his ability to set people at ease with his perfect manners and smooth rhetoric? No. These things are missing. But he has one quality they find highly reassuring.

He does not seem to agree with the highly refined geniuses who look upon businesses as a giant lemon which can be squeezed this way and that so as to bring about a quasi-paradise. This galoot does not believe that wages can simply be dictated and the payroll departments can be told to radically re-organize the way they’ve done business for years. He has been in business and knows that the regulatory hit could be even more damaging than high taxes. He is a schlub, but a practical one in many ways. Let’s say he has a street-level intuition about the limits of bureaucracy.

This first president, the one who doesn’t cut a fine figure in suits and resembles eccentric characters from the world of fiction, isn’t going to get much done. That’s okay. Some of his ideas are probably not great and are better left on a campaign website. For some, that is a bad thing. But it also happens that many think he won’t achieve political goals…and THAT is a good thing.

President number one is not very good at making the engine of government hum, but we may discover that such a quality is a feature and not a bug. When es to growing the state, Americans may find that they prefer an amateur to a pro.

Photo: Public Domain, tpsdave

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
C.S. Lewis on the Specter of Totalitarianism
The great Christian apologist’s “scientocracy” is upon us. What should be our response? Read More… It is safe to say C.S. Lewis is not known first of all for his treatment of totalitarianism. We are familiar with Lewis the Christian apologist, Lewis the writer of children’s stories and science fiction fantasy, Lewis the literary critic and Oxford don, and then chair of medieval and renaissance literature at Cambridge. We’re less familiar with Lewis the political thinker. But in the almost...
Fear and the Feeble Foundations of Ideology
Whether in the spiritual or the political realm, lies, fear, and a lust for power threaten human dignity and flourishing. But the light of truth shines in the darkness still. Read More… I recently read the monumental essay “The Power of the Powerless” (1978) by Soviet dissident Václav Havel and immediately began to draw parallels between how he describes socialist oppression and what I understand of diabolical oppression. As a veteran Marine Corps infantry officer and 20-year catechist in the...
A Catholic College Guts Its Curriculum
Marymount is not alone in this. Colleges across the country are making hard decisions about what to keep and what to drop to stay afloat. But providing an education grounded in the search for truth, one that inspires the heart as well as the mind and that holds out hope of something more than a paycheck, should be part of that process. Read More… Some years ago, only tangentially related to the reading we were doing in our seminar class,...
Quentin Tarantino and the Freedom of ’70s Cinema
One of the most celebrated of contemporary filmmakers has a new book out in which he shares how he has spent his career trying to recapture the exuberance, excitement, and exhilarating freedom of a special period in film history. Read More… Hollywood has largely run out of artists and doesn’t seem able or perhaps even interested in producing movies that can hold a candle to the great achievements of its 100-year history. America still dominates cinema, but it has debased...
Ad-Copy Gospel and the Christian Marketing Dilemma
The “He Gets Us” ad campaign that drew so much attention during the Super Bowl is sleek Christianity for a secular audience, but what does “success” really look like? Read More… With perhaps the exception of the recent Asbury revival, it’s rare to see Christianity referenced in popular culture in a positive way. Be it debates over Christian nationalism or the tragically unending list of church abuse scandals, Christianity’s portrayal within modern media often swings on a doom-and-gloom pendulum, between...
The Adam Smith We Need
Scholars’ tendency to read the great economist through the lens of their own philosophical and mitments is neither unexpected nor helpful. One book helps us identify some of those biases and also something closer to Smith’s true legacy. Read More… There are two reasons to read Glory M. Liu’s prehensive book,Adam Smith’s America: How a Scottish Philosopher Became an Icon of American Capitalism. The first is that if you are a student of economics or history, there is a remarkable...
Creating Christ: Challenging Christian Origins
A new documentary, 30 years in the making, argues for a Roman provenance for the Christian religion. Does it convince? Read More… As Creating Christ will have it, Christianity as we know it was more or less invented, or at least redirected, by two members of the Flavian dynasty, Emperor Vespasian and his son (and eventual emperor) Titus, as a way of enforcing docility on zealous Jewish sects who wanted pagan Rome out of Jerusalem and out of their lives....
Conservative Compassion Fatigue
The 1990s saw several Republican-initiated welfare-reform proposals gain little traction. But some progress was being made on the local level, where most people still saw hope for real, personal change. Read More… Part 3 of my series on poverty and the welfare state ended with a brief look at munity associations in South Dallas. As the Washington welfare-reform impasse in 1995 and 1996 dragged on, I traveled the country learning and speechifying. I learned much from Deborah Darden and her...
The Myth of American Inequality
A new book challenges false narratives and skewed statistics that make the e prospects of Americans appear worse than they are. We must get our facts straight before we can implement better policies and eliminate a key obstacle to real progress: government-sanctioned disincentives to work. Read More… The notion of rising e inequality has permeated modern American discourse and is assumed as inherent to our economic system such that any claim to the contrary is easily dismissed as ignorance or...
The Asbury Revival in the Long Run
When students at a small Christian college in Kentucky got caught up in prayer and refused to leave an otherwise routine chapel service, the world took notice. What it meant all depends on what—or Who you think was responsible. Read More… Sometimes God works and speaks to people in mysterious ways. At other times, He is as blunt and obvious as a slap in the face. The recent Asbury revival in Wilmore, Kentucky, qualifies as an example of the latter....
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved