Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
A recipe for economic recovery from COVID-19
A recipe for economic recovery from COVID-19
Jan 10, 2026 1:25 AM

With the focus on COVID-19 shifting from the health emergency (easing) to getting the economy going again (glimmers of hope), it’s easy to forget just how good the economy was before the pandemic hit. Recall that in mid-February, financial news organizations were reporting that the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq Composite indexes were hitting record highs.

In “Getting America Back to Work.” (Encounter Books, 2020), Andy Puzder has drawn a sharp contrast between the eight-year stagnation and regulatory overkill of the Obama administration and what he calls the Trump Economic Boom that followed. Among the many indicators he cites in his 43-page broadside is the National Federation of Independent Business optimism Index, which “blasted off” the day after President Trump’s November 2016 election and remained at historic highs right through February.

“Although massive government interventions that Barack Obama pursued following the Great Recession might presently appear beneficial or even essential, a return to Obama’s ‘new normal’ of stagnant growth would lead to disastrous and persisting economic damage,” he writes. “We must instead return, as soon as is safely possible, to the Trump model of economic prosperity that produced the strongest labor market in modern history.”

Puzder is a senior fellow at the Pepperdine School of Policy and was President Trump’s first nominee for Secretary of Labor. He withdrew the nomination in February 2017. He is the former CEO of CKE Restaurants Inc., pany of, among other fast food restaurants, Carl’s Jr. and Hardee’s.

So how do we get the economy going again? Will this be a short, sharp downturn, or a long agonizing stretch of slow growth and weak employment?

Puzder’s recipe is for more of the same policies that encouraged the “Trump boom” in the first place: regulatory relief, certainty, and tax policies that allow businesses and individuals to keep most of what they earn. That’s not a sure thing given that many on the left are intent on using the economic crisis to permanently expand government reach into the economy and prolong the labor market agony. To back that up, Puzder cites, among others, ment by House Majority Whip James Clyburn, D-S.C., that the coronavirus crisis is “a tremendous opportunity to restructure things to fit our vision.”

What that vision is doesn’t take much guesswork. You just have to listen to the actual words of those not wanting to let the coronavirus crisis go to waste. Here’s the response of Gov. Gavin Newsom, D-Calif., when asked in early April if the crisis was creating the potential for a new progressive era. “Yes,” he answered, “we see this as an opportunity to reshape the way we do business and how we govern.”

But you have to wonder how the Clyburn or Newsom vision could improve on the Trump numbers for those at the low-wage end of the labor market, which were at historic highs before the pandemic overturned the gains. If the dignity of work means anything at all, it has to be within the grasp of those in hourly wage jobs in sectors such as retail, hospitality, manufacturing, construction and the like.

“In 2019, unemployment hit lows not seen since the government began reporting the data for African Americans, Hispanics, Asians and people with only a high school education,” Puzder writes. “For women, the unemployment rate hit a sixty-five-year low and for teenagers (aged 16-19) it hit a fifty year low.”

Economic growth under Trump policies was strong, but what about the trade war with China? Fed economists estimated that the trade disruptions with China may have cost the United States 1 percentage point in growth. Still, under Trump, GDP growth hit 2.9% in 2018 and 2.3% in 2019. Puzder says that under Obama GDP failed to achieve a single year of 3% GDP growth, and only grew at a 1.6% rate in his last year in office.

“The same recipe that produced the strongest labor market in modern history can restore the wealth we lost because of the pandemic,” Puzder predicts. “If government helps people now, as it should, but otherwise gets out of the way and empowers the private sector, the impact of the virus will be a short-term hit from which we will recover rapidly. If the government keeps its heavy hand on the economy, we may never fully recover.”

How we handle this crisis going forward will make all the difference now. And that’s on all of us. “When this crisis ends, the choice will be ours,” Puzder concludes.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Which Vocations Should Be Off Limits to Christians?
The Reformation doctrine of vocation teaches that even seemingly secular jobs and earthly relationships are spheres where God assigns Christians to live out their faith, notes Gene Veith. But are there some lines of work that Christians should avoid? God himself works through human vocations in providential care as he governs the world. He provides daily bread through farmers and bakers. He protects us through lawful magistrates. He heals us by means of physicians, nurses, and pharmacists. He creates new...
Miller: Here I Come to Save the World Bank
In The American Spectator, Acton Institute’s Michael Matheson Miller throws his hat into the ring as he launches a tongue-in-cheek candidacy for World Bank president, but also raises serious questions about the institution’s poverty fighting programs. Miller is a research fellow at Acton, where he directs PovertyCure, an initiative that promotes enterprise solutions to poverty. Jeffrey Sachs — are you listening? Here are some planks from Miller’s campaign platform: I don’t believe that foreign aid is the solution — or...
Europe: A Turtle on its Back?
Would dissolving the mon currency, as proposed by the French free-market economist and entrepreneur Charles Gave in his bookLibéral mais non coupable(“Liberal But Not Guilty”) free the Old Continent to stand upright on its financial feet again?Or would dissolving the currency drastically end the European project altogether, as some pro-Euro technocrats in Brussels fear? Charles Gave, the chairman of the investment firmGaveKal, (and whose lecture I listened to at a 2011 Acton Conference Family Enterprise, Market Economies, and Poverty in...
Can Fair Trade End Poverty?
Which does a better job helping the impoverished peoplearound the globe—free trade or fair trade? The American Enterprise Institute recently held a debate on that topic at John Brown Universityentitled “Free Trade vs. Fair Trade: What Helps the Poor?” Click here to watch the debate between scholars Claude Barfield, Paul Myers, and Victor Claar. In the debate Dr. Claar raises concerns about both the logic and economic reasoning underlying the fair trade movement. He also expands on that theme in...
Private Charity: A Practitioner’s View
There are only a few days left to register for the AU Online session, Private Charity: A Practitioner’s View! This online session will take place on March 27 and feature highly-rated Acton lecturer and current U.S. Regional Facilitator for Partners Worldwide, Rudy Carrasco. In a lecture that blends the theoretical with real-life encounters and stories, Rudy shows how using local knowledge and resources unavailable and unsuited to public agencies is vital for effective charity. Why wait to hear Rudy speak...
Does the Vatican think water should be ‘free’?
Not surprisingly, the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace (PCJP)’s latest document on water has garnered scant media attention. Why, after all, would journalists, already notorious for their professional Attention Deficit Disorder and dislike of abstract disputation, report on something named “Water: An Essential Element of Life,” especially when it is nothing more than an update of a document originally released in 2003, and then updated in 2006 and 2009, with the exact same titles? Back then, First Things editor-in-chief...
The Social Muddle
Over on The American Spectator website, Acton research fellow Jonathan Witt explains that contrary to the misunderstanding of many on the political and religious left,business, justice, and the Gospel are already social: The adjective that economist Friedrich Hayek famously called a “weasel word” is alive and well in the feel-good phrasessocial business,social justiceandthe social gospel. In all three of these phrases, mon weasel word sucks some of the essential meaning out of what it modifies by implying that business, justice,...
John Locke and the Contraceptive Mandate
Michael Gerson on what the Obama administration’s view of religious liberty shares with John Locke: One tradition of religious liberty contends that freedom of conscience is protected and advanced by the autonomy of religious groups. In this view, government should honor an institutional pluralism — the ability of people to associate, live and act in accordance with their religious beliefs, limited only by the clear requirements of public order. So Roger Williams ed Catholics and Quakers to the Rhode Island...
Obama Administration Actions Affecting Religious Freedom
“The past year has marked a shift in religious liberty debates,” notes Sarah Pulliam Bailey at Christianity Today, “one that previously centered on hiring rights but became focused on health care requirements.” Bailey put together a helpful timeline that shows a number of actions the government took in the past year, setting precedents and priorities on various issues affecting religious freedom. ...
HHS Mandate Fits Bigger Pattern
Both the original promise versions of the Obama administration’s health insurance mandate (the HHS mandate) coerce people into paying, either directly or indirectly, for other people’s contraception. The policy may have been pushed along by exigencies of Democratic Party constituency politics, but I suspect there’s also a worldview dimension to the mandate, one embodied in one of President Obama’s more controversial appointments—Science and Technology Policy Director John Holdren. Holdren, as far as I know, wasn’t involved in crafting President Obama’s...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved