Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
A cryptocurrency? Tech stock? Bubble? What exactly has Bitcoin become?
A cryptocurrency? Tech stock? Bubble? What exactly has Bitcoin become?
Mar 25, 2026 4:32 PM

Four years ago I wrote a series of posts on what Christians should know about bitcoin. At the time a single bitcoin was worth $266, and I wasn’t sure it’d be around for five more years. This week a single bitcoin was trading for $17,800 and it looks like it’ll be around long past my five-year mark. But the rapid and inexplicable rise in price of bitcoins has caused some people to wonder what’s going on—and even e confused what bitcoin is anymore. What is bitcoin nowadays? Here are a few possible answers.

Is bitcoin still a cryptocurrency?

Not really. Bitcoin has e the most popular mainstream cryptocurrency by ceasing to be a form of currency. Sure, you can still technically buy some goods and services with bitcoin. But because it is prone to deflation you’d be foolish to do so.

Deflation, a decline in the general price level, occurs when the price of goods and services decline relative to a specific measure. The value of the goods and services themselves do not have to decline for deflation to occur; all that is required is for the value of the currency itself to increase. This is exactly what has occurred for the entire existence of bitcoin.

Because of its deflationary nature, bitcoin is a terrible form of currency. For example, in 2010, a developer named Laszlo Hanyecz traded 10,000 bitcoins for two Papa John’s pizzas. At the time the bitcoins were worth about $40. Today, those coins would be worth $1.7 million dollars. Anyone who bought anything with bitcoins prior to 2017 is likely regretting their purchase.

It bitcoin a tech stock?

Definitely not. There are several ways that stocks are valued, but most of them are based on the assumption that the pany has or will have future earnings which will either justify the rise in price or will lead to a distribution of dividends to shareholders.

While bitcoin sometimes acts like a stock (i.e., it can be traded on exchanges, is subject to technical analysis, etc.), there is pany underlying bitcoins—only a blockchain. Bitcoin will also never have earnings, though it currently pays out a form of “dividend” to bitcoin miners (see my previous series for more on how bitcoin works).

Is bitcoin the “new gold”?

Bitcoin is like Gold 2.0, says Tyler Winklevoss.

No, it’s not. While bitcoin appeals to many of the same people who once preferred gold as an investment vehicle, bitcoin has few similarities to the precious metal. For starters, bitcoin is a pure “fiat currency” similar to the U.S. dollar. Gold modity money. Gold is also an actual physical asset that has some use for real-world applications. Bitcoin is an intangible asset whose monetary value is solely dependent on how much hard currency people are willing to exchange for it.

Additionally, gold has the advantage of being a long-term illusion: gold is valuable because for thousands of years we humans have convinced ourselves that gold is valuable. Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have a long way to go before they can create a similar “money delusion.”

Is bitcoin a wealth redistribution system?

Yes, it is. The question is what type of wealth redistribution system. The most generous take is that similar to Valentin Schmid, who contends that bitcoin “favors risk takers, innovators, savers, and people who are curious and persistent enough to learn new technology as well as history.” Those people, who jumped on the bitcoin train early enough “will be richly rewarded and their purchasing power will increase.”

That’s certainly true to some extent, since 40 percent of bitcoin is held by about 1,000 people. As the price of bitcoin increases, the value of the holdings of these early movers is rising almost exponentially. The key for them is when to unload bitcoins for hard currency and collect the wealth that has been accumulating to them. When they do (and they can even collude together on the timing since bitcoin isn’t subject to financial regulations) the bitcoins held by the late movers will be worth much, much less than they bought them for.

Another, less congenial, term for this is a ponzi scheme. The price of bitcoin is currently rising based solely on the idea that the price will rise even further. And as long as there are “greater fools” to bid up the price of the cryptocurrency, the price will continue rise. Eventually, though, when there are no more fools left, the bubble will pop—and thousands of people will have lost real money.

Is bitcoin a speculative bubble?

Yes, almost assuredly. Financial bubbles involve outsized growth in the price of an asset beyond its true value. Bitcoin has no intrinsic value so why do people hold it as an asset? Because they think it can be sold an even higher price in the future (see: greater fool theory). As economist John Cochrane explains:

[I]f the price [of an asset] is greater than zero, either people see some “dividend,” some value in holding the asset, beyond its cash payments; equivalently they are willing to hold the asset despite a lower expected return going forward, or they think the price will keep going up forever, so that price appreciation alone provides petitive return. The first two are called “convenience yield,” the latter is a “rational bubble.”

“Rational bubbles” are intriguing, but I think fundamentally flawed. If a price goes up forever, eventually the value of bitcoin must exceed all of US wealth, then all of world wealth, then all of interplanetary wealth, then all of the atoms in the universe. The “greater fool” or Ponzi scheme theory must break down at some point, or rely on an irrational belief in the next fool. The rational bubbles theory also does not account for the association of price surges with high volatility and high trading volume.

The fact that bitcoin is a speculative bubble, though, does not mean that it will pop anytime soon. As long as the people who hold the most coins—the “bitcoin whales”—think there are greater fools who will bid up the price, the bubble is likely to last a long time.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Rev. Sirico on the Romney Speech
The following is a statement by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, president of the Acton Institute, on Mitt Romney’s Dec. 6 “Faith in America” speech: Mitt Romney is right that religion and morality are core convictions in American society. Our freedom depends on this, pletely agree. Without the ability to manage our lives morally, the state steps into the vacuum, both in response to public demand and to serve the state’s own interests in expanding power. But soon after spelling this...
Criminalizing Thought
For those of us who cherish liberty and the freedom we enjoy in the west to engage in spirited debate, stories like this are very disturbing: Up north, the Canadian Islamic Congress announced the other day that at least two of Canada’s “Human Rights Commissions” – one federal, one provincial – had agreed to hear plaints that their “human rights” had been breached by this “flagrantly Islamophobic” excerpt from my book, as published in the country’s bestselling news magazine, Maclean’s....
UPDATED: Mitt Romney — Reassuring Evangelical Voters?
Presidential candidate Mitt Romney is expected to address the topic of his Mormon faith in a speech at the George Bush Library in College Station, Texas, tomorrow. The parisons are being made to President John F. Kennedy, a Roman Catholic, who gave a speech in 1960 to assuage the concerns of American protestants over papal influence in the White House. Kennedy’s speech to the Greater Houston Ministerial Association can be found here. In addition, there is also a link for...
Tonight: Rev. Sirico on Fox Business to discuss ‘WWJB?’
Rev. Robert A. Sirico, president of the Acton Institute, is scheduled to join Fox Business host David Asman tonight to discuss the new documentary, “What Would Jesus Buy?” They’ll be joined by documentary producer Morgan Spurlock and performance artist Bill Talen, of the “Church of Stop Shopping.” The segment is set to air between 7-8 p.m. Eastern time. Check your local listings — and expect a lively debate. Watch the WWJB? trailer here. Update: Here’s the interview… ...
Global Warming Consensus Alert – Gassy ‘Roos to Save Planet?
Here at Global Warming Consensus Watch World Headquarters we’re bold. We push the limits. We tackle subjects that other bloggers just don’t have the guts to tackle (I’m looking at you, Ballor). And if that means we need to do a post on kangaroo flatulance, then that’s what we do. But what, you may be asking, does the gassy emission of the herbivorous marsupial of the family Macropodidae, of Australia and adjacent islands, have to do with climate change? We’re...
Global Warming Consensus Alert – Parking Crisis!
Add another crisis to the list of problems caused by climate change – a lack of jet parking at small international airports. To be fair, this isn’t a direct consequence of climate change, but it wouldn’t be a problem in Bali, Indonesia right now if not for the big UN climate change shindig that’s going on. Via Newsbusters, a report on the urgent situation: Tempo Interaktif reports that Angkasa Pura – the management of Bali’s Ngurah Rai International Airport are...
Young, Conservative, and Evangelical
Awhile back in a PowerBlog exclusive I asserted, “Many, if not most, young evangelicals are just as conservative on life issues as their forebears.” Here are some references to back that up: First, 70% Evangelicals 18-29 who favor “making it more difficult for a woman to get an abortion.”55% Evangelicals 30 and older who favor this. (HT: Go Figure) From: “Young White Evangelicals: Less Republican, Still Conservative,” Pew Research Center. And next, “In attitudes toward education, drugs, abortion, religion, marriage,...
Farm Subsidies Follow-up: Feed the Rich
In one of this week’s Acton Commentaries, Ray Nothstine and I juxtapose a static, sedentary dependence on government subsidies with a dynamic, entrepreneurial spirit of innovation. The impetus for this short piece was an article that originally appeared in the Grand Rapids Press (linked in mentary). I have two things to say about these stories and then I want to add some further reflections on the world of agricultures subsidies. First, I found the article’s “hook” to be quite shoddy...
Farm Subsidies: Sustaining Dependency
Are farmers hooked on pork? Jordan Ballor and Ray Nothstine look at the current battle over farm subsidies. “By encouraging the production of modities, the government is creating a cycle of dependency that undermines entrepreneurial initiative,” they write. Read the mentary here. ...
What Latin Americans Want
What’s behind the stunning defeat of Venezuela’s President Hugo Chavez in a popular referendum this week? Undoubtedly, he overestimated the appeal of his “21st century socialism” among Latin Americans. A new poll also shows that the most trusted institution in Latin America is not the government — but the Catholic Church. Read the mentary here. ...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved