Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
A British view of the 2020 presidential election
A British view of the 2020 presidential election
Jul 18, 2025 7:59 PM

When es to elections, my preference is for an “ideas person” – someone who can articulate a vision for political and economic liberty, a constitutionalist, someone with a moral outlook informed by faith and advocacy for small government. I am usually disappointed. Ideas people are rarely elected – in the UK, the last such example was Margaret Thatcher, the prime minister from 1979-1990. She understood that, in the same way that a household must balance its budget, so too must the state.

Neither Donald Trump nor Joe Biden could be described as ideas people. The principal attraction of each is that they are not the other. The British media, like other liberal news outlets, wants Biden to win and they despise Donald Trump. Then again, they wanted Hillary Clinton to win. And Barack Obama. And Al Gore. And Bill Clinton …. There are three ways in which foreign media (and indeed perhaps the U.S. domestic media) misrepresent seemingly unimportant matters to colour the election.

The first is the misinterpretation of the Electoral College. The Electoral College is presented as the underhanded reason that Donald Trump won in 2016 and if he wins again in 2020, the system will again be offered as a scapegoat for what will be seen as a distorted result.

On the contrary, the Founding Fathers knew exactly what they were doing when they established the Electoral College. They understood that true democracy is not simply about majority votes, and they displayed great wisdom in ensuring that a balance of interests was maintained in the presidential system. It is time for a more articulate defence of the Electoral College in both domestic and transatlantic media.

First, the Electoral College ensures that a presidential victor has breadth of appeal as well as depth of appeal. In 2016, Clinton displayed considerable depth – in California and in New York, where the ballots cast for the Democrat could have been weighed rather than counted. Donald Trump won because he demonstrated breadth across states large and small in the enormous and vast nation that is the United States.

Secondly, in a federal system of government, the protection of the rights of smaller states is an important balance and a protection of their liberties. The Electoral College system gives slightly greater weight to the votes of the smaller states relative to population pared to the more populous states. This is exactly the same principle as in the election of the U.S. Senate, where every state is allocated two senators regardless of its size. Thus, everyone campaigning for the abolition of the Electoral College should also campaign for the abolition of the Senate. The fact that some are doing so simply illustrates that the tyranny of the majority is patible with liberty.

Let’s not take any nonsense about the Electoral College denying the will of the electorate. Democracy is neither demonstrated nor served by a president being elected because a candidate runs up millions of votes in the San Francisco Bay area whilst failing to demonstrate support across Alabama, Georgia, North and South Carolina, Tennessee, and West Virginia.

The second area the foreign media misrepresent the U.S. presidential election is in its coverage of mail-in balloting. They fail to distinguish between a voter requesting a mail-in ballot and the state preemptively mailing a ballot to every voter on the state’s voter rolls, although the names, addresses, even the voter’s status as living or dead may be outdated. The UK’s media fail to recognise the potential for fraud, which poses a direct threat to political liberties.

The third area in which the foreign media misrepresent the situation in the United States is the claim that President Trump is stacking the Supreme Court with extreme, right-wing justices. However, Barack Obama stacked the court with left-wing justices like Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. If Justice Stephen Breyer retires during a Biden administration, the president will surely replace him with a judge who shares a similar ideology. These three judges have sometimes shown themselves indifferent to protecting the fundamental rights of U.S. citizens to live out their faith. Many overseas observers of American politics simply fail to understand the importance of ensuring that religious liberty is protected through the appointment of constitutional judges to the courts, not least the Supreme Court.

Part of this es from Trump’s status as a confirmed populist. To people interested in ideas, populism jars. What the liberal media fail to recognise, however, is that populism is remarkably popular, and populist leaders often cut through to voters and reach parts of the electorate that others do not.

In the UK’s London-centric leftist media, Boris Johnson is considered an immoral buffoon. To voters outside of London, he speaks their language, reflects their priorities – he cuts through. Shortly before the December 2019 British General Election, Boris Johnson visited a chemical works in the former steel town of Redcar in northeastern England. (The closest U.S. analogue would be Pittsburgh.) The sitting Labour (socialist) member had polled 56% of the vote in the previous election. The media showed Boris flubbing his response during a question-and-answer session. But the media did not show a group of chemical workers in their overalls and hard hats holding up a sign that said, “We love Boris.” In that election, the Labour Party’s vote fell to 37%, and the district elected a Conservative member for the first time in its history. His populist rhetoric prepared them for his free-market economics.

The way in which the U.S. presidential election is reported outside of the U.S. seriously distorts fundamental issues which underlie political, economic and religious liberty. That is the case irrespective of whether one agrees with the president’s policies.

But, what about character? I have many doubts about Donald Trump’s moral character. I find the narcissism particularly off-putting and his incessant “policy by tweet” most irritating. There are certainly moral questions for the Christian observer – as indeed there were for Hillary Clinton, who was hardly a paragon of virtue. Nor was Bill.

So, what to do? For myself, if I were an American citizen, I would lament the lack of candidates with ideas and vision. But in the final analysis, I would not shun my duty as a Christian citizen to cast a vote informed by my faith.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Is it really ‘aid’ if it goes to relatively wealthy nations?
Alan Duncan, an aid minister in the UK, says his government is “forced” to hand over large amounts of money to the EU’s foreign aid budget, but has no say in how the money is spent. The problem is that much of the $2 billion+ “aid” money (one-sixth of the British budget) goes to projects such as making a Moroccan water park more eco-friendly, an art project in St. Petersburg, and building a hotel and plex in Barbados. Britain’s International...
Want to Help the Poor? Promote a Free Market in Health Care
Want to help the poor? Promote a free market in health care. That’s the argument made by John C. Goodman, author of the new book Priceless: Curing the Healthcare Crisis. Timothy Dalrymple recently talked with Goodman about the best approach for restoring free-market pricing mechanisms into the market for medical care and health insurance: Aren’t there some people, however, who have little of money and lots of time, and would prefer to wait in order to receive cheaper care? There...
Counting the Profit of a Third Party Choice
Joe Carter recently highlighted the discussion at Ethika Politika, the journal of the Center for Morality in Public Life, about the value of (not) voting, particularly the suggestion by Andrew Haines that in some cases there is a moral duty not to vote. This morning I respond with an analysis of the consequences of not voting, ultimately arguing that one must not neglect to count the cost of abstaining to vote for any particular office. One issue, however, that I...
Stop Apologizing for Our Liberties
You cannot apologize to a fanatic, says Lee Harris. It only serves to convince him that he was right all along: The last few weeks have witnessed a peculiar and disturbing spectacle: An American administration that has spent a great deal of time and energy apologizing for our liberties—in particular, for what many would regard as the foundation of all our other liberties, namely, the freedom to express our minds as we see fit. This signature freedom, of which Americans...
Did 2,362 Millionaires Get Unemployment Checks in 2009? (Answer: Yes they did.)
The Congressional Research Service (CRS), a group that works exclusively for the U.S. Congress, issued a report with one of the greatest titles I’ve ever seen on a government document: Receipt of Unemployment Insurance by e Unemployed Workers (“Millionaires”) Now the first nine words are nothing special, typical policy-wonk speak. But whoever added in the word “millionaires” with scare quotes and parentheses is a genius. Most people would have been nodding off around the word “Insurance” but seeing millionaires (that’s...
How were people On Call in Culture 165 years ago?
What is so special about 1837? That was the year Abraham Kuyper was born. September 29th is his 165th birthday. So we thought we would go back to 1837 and see how people were being On Call in Culture back then. We don’t know if they were all believers on a mission to bless the world, but by seeing what was going on 165 years ago, we hope you are encouraged to engage your world in 2012! How did people...
Markets and culture: A time to play, a time to pray
Faced with the prospect of a professional athletic career, a nearly-half million dollar salary, and a perfect lady, what’s not to like? Apparently, for Grant Desme, it was the noise and unrest of the world. Can a culture of life and the noise and tumult of the marketplace co-exist? Rev. Robert Sirico, reflecting on this, says they can, so long as it is not a place where: [C]apitalism…places the human person at the mercy of blind economic forces…What we propose,...
On Call with Dr. Pamela Casson
Dr. Pamela Casson, a pediatrician in Colorado Springs, knows what it means literally to be “On Call.” This week she shares with us in this video interview with Jon Hirst how she sees God working through her in her work with families, children and the world around her. Thank you Pamela for giving us an inside look at how you see your work as blessing the world. ...
Rev. Sirico on Life, Work, and Human Flourishing
J.Q. Tomanek of Ignitum Today interviewed Rev. Sirico about life, work, human flourishing, and his new book, Defending the Free Market: JQ Tomanek: Back in the day, holiness was misinterpreted as a cleric or religious life thing. How can a lay Catholic practice their faith? What are some ways to sanctify our work as lay Catholics? Is “ora et labora” just a monk thing? Reverend Sirico: Yes, religious people are often tempted to e so “heavenly minded they are no...
Dodd-Frank: The Other Serious Threat
At least es at us head on. The greater legislative threat may be the one that most Americans have never heard of. Economist Scott Powell and Acton friend Jay Richards explain in a new piece in Barron’s: While Obamacare received more attention, the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, also known as Dodd-Frank after its Senate and House sponsors, … unleashed a new regulatory body, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, to operate with unprecedented power. Dodd-Frank became law in...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved