Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
A biblical theology of work, Part 2: Wealth creation
A biblical theology of work, Part 2: Wealth creation
Jan 2, 2026 9:11 PM

In Part 1 of our “theology of work” series, we examined why we work, concluding that following our calling, whatever that may be, provides us with meaning and purpose, and represents mand of God in creation. Part 2 examines the virtues of work, earning a living and using that wealth honorably.

Read More…

Wealth creation is a divine imperative, though one that generates significant responsibilities. The church fails on business and economics when leaders think only about the responsibilities of wealth and nothing at all about how that wealth is created – both are divine imperatives. Money can empower believers to provide for others, to invest in the church, and to do good works. If we believe wealth creation is a divine imperative than that implies a market economy for the creation of wealth as part of the divine dispensation.

We must not overlook the transforming power of wealth creation in God’s world. Michael Novak, in his 1991 book, “The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism,” wrote:

Of all the systems of political economy which have shaped our history, none has so revolutionized ordinary expectations of human life – lengthened the life span, made the elimination of poverty and famine thinkable, enlarged the range of human choice – as democratic capitalism.

He goes on to define democratic capitalism as a system essentially defined by a market economy and a free society. It is difficult to contest that without the market economy, society would have made significantly less progress in the fight against poverty and people would be much less free. Indeed, the United Nations, in its 2015 report on the achievement of its Millennial Goals, reported that the proportion of the world population living in extreme poverty ($1.25 per day) had dropped, between 1990 and 2015, to 14% from 47%, a reduction of nearly 70%. The middle classes had tripled.

Wealth creation as biblical imperative

The basic reason why wealth creation is a biblical imperative is that it is a mandate to create. This takes us back to the theological principles around creation and the divine mandate to work. Indeed, if there as a divine mandate to work, there must be some form of mandate to create wealth or else the mandate to work would be utterly meaningless. What we mean by a creation mandate is something which is set out by God as part of the principles of creation for all people for all time.

“The Lord God took the man and put him in the Garden of Eden to work it and keep it” (Genesis 2:15). This short verse has enormous implications. In fact, it is an mand from God. This mandate does not mean we should work for no purpose, but should instead harness the resources of God’s created world in producing goods and adding value. mand precedes the entry into the world of sin and the fall. In other words, not only work per se, but economic productivity and wealth creation are part of God’s intention for every person. This basic requirement also has implications for any government programmes that encourage dependency rather than work.

Reinforcing Genesis 2:15, there is a remarkable description of what God has provided for those who work the land. In describing the Garden of Eden and its setting in vv8-14 of Genesis 2, we read that God had provided trees and water, but that also between the head waters of the rivers which flowed out from Eden God provided three precious materials: gold, aromatic resin and onyx. In v12, we are told that the gold found in the land of Havilah is good. Divine endorsement of a crucial precious metal makes absolute sense when mand to work follows. When mand to work and bining of raw materials are put together then it makes absolute sense when the Bible described in Genesis 4 the principle of specialisation and in Ex 35:30 the principle of human development through the endowment of skills. The Bible articulates the development merce. In the creation narratives, God provides mand and the materials. Hence the creation of wealth is a spiritual imperative.

In the New Testament, we see the same emphasis set out for us in the parable of the talents in Matthew 25:14-30. Each person was equipped with an amount of money related to his abilities and they invested the capital and obtained a return (well, two of them did). Their diligence was rewarded with more. The unfaithful servant was berated for failing even to put the money on deposit. In essence, this parable is about our spiritual responsibility to use our gifts and talents to obtain economic returns though effective stewardship and investment, and a warning against an over-obsession with equality.

Wealth creation and spiritual responsibility

Having established that wealth creation is a biblical and spiritual imperative, there remains an important further aspect to examine. If we have this wealth, what do we do with it? What is the responsibility of the individual with wealth? We are not called to simply give it away and e poor (the monastic error) or to think that all responsibility for dealing with issues of poverty lies with government (the socialist error). There is no special morality attached to a government pound. Rather, the key to understanding the response to wealth lies in recognizing the variety of ways in which the New Testament deals with Luke 14:33 – So therefore, any one of you whodoes not renounce all that he has cannot be my disciple.”

What does “renounce” mean? Well, it doesn’t mean don’t make a profit – for some 20 years Jesus himself worked in his earthly father’s carpentry business which presumably made profits in order to be sustainable over that time. We know Simon and Andrew actually ran a fishing business with employees (Mark 2:20). We know that the apostles left behind their homes and livelihoods, but there is no evidence that they sold off all their possessions (Luke 5:11, 27; 18:28-30). The Rich Young Ruler, by contrast, is told to liquidate his assets and distribute them to the poor his was clearly a blockage (Luke 18:19-27), whereas Zacchaeus only promises half his goods plus restitution (Luke 19:1-10). The women disciples of Luke 8:1-3 never divest themselves of wealth, but instead use their resources to support Jesus and the Twelve on an ongoing basis. Paul works as a craftsman in order to support himself and provide for the needs of panions and those in need (Acts 20:33-35). There is also Lydia (Acts 16), a wealthy merchant who gave hospitality in her house to the believers.

Jesus demands our all. Precisely what that means spiritually for each one of us is not laid down in economic terms precisely because of the economic creation mandate to create wealth. We are then called to act in a responsible manner with that wealth.

Wealth creation then is a divine imperative which carries with it awesome responsibility. John Wesley in his sermon on money said, “Earn all you can, save all you can, give all you can. Work in the divine economy and receive blessing, indeed monetary blessing. Discharge your responsibilities well.”

A biblical theology of work, Part 1: Why work?

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Tim Keller on the ‘saltiness’ of self-denial in the modern age
What does it look like for Christians to be “salt and light” in the modern age? In the recent keynote address at the National Parliamentary Prayer Breakfast, Tim Keller spoke to Prime Minister Theresa May and over 140 MPs about the cultural influence of Christianity, past and future. “What can Christianity offer our society in the 21st century?” asks Keller, who will be the guest speaker at the Acton Institute’s 28th Annual Dinnerthis October. “And I’d like to answer that...
The Trump-Putin summit: A view from Eastern Europe
mentary on Trump’s meeting with Vladimir Putin ranges from “a great idea and a good idea” to “treasonous.” But outside the traditional U.S. talking points, an Eastern European leader says the summit was “a missed opportunity” to promote faith and liberty. Mihail Neamtu, Ph.D., a public intellectual in Romania, analyzes the NATO summit and Trump’s meeting with Vladimir Putin in anew essayfor Acton’sReligion & Liberty Transatlantic website. Neamtu writes that Trump did not point out the source of Russia’s ings:...
5 facts about Russian President Vladimir Putin
President Donald Trump met today with Vladimir Putin for a summit in Helsinki, Finland. Here are five facts you should know aboutthe powerful and controversialRussian president. 1.Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin was born in Cold War era Russia in 1952. His mother worked in a factory during World War II, and his father was drafted into the army,where he served on a submarine fleet. During his younger years, Putinwas an atheist. He says he turned to the church after two major accidents...
Vladimir Putin is winning over (anti-capitalist) Catholics
“Tomorrow I leave this land of hope and return to our Western countries – the countries of despair,” wrote George Bernard Shaw as he prepared to depart Stalin’s Soviet Union in 1931. Many Western intellectuals idolized the USSR as a viable economic alternative to the free market – and a certain variety of Western Catholic now sees Vladimir Putin as the leader of an analogous movement. At the Acton Institute’s Religion & Liberty Transatlantic website, Stefano Magni writes: [I]t is...
How patents, prizes and subsidies affect idea creation
Note: This is post #85 in a weekly video series on basic economics. The last entry in this series considered how institutions can incentivize the creation of new ideas. Because of this connection, the Founding Fatherswrote a protection mechanism for new ideas into the U.S. Constitution in the form of patents. But arepatents the only (or even best) way to reward good ideas? In this video by Marginal Revolution University,Alex Tabarrok examinestwo more incentive options: prizes, and subsidies. (If you...
How the UN Report on extreme poverty in America goes astray
During the 38th Session of the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC), on June 18 – July 6, 2018, the UN Special Rapporteur, an Englishman by the name of Philip Alston, presented a report on poverty in the United States, the full text of which may be read here. This report, based on a two-week fact-finding mission to various locations in the United States and interviews with local, state, and federal politicians and civil servants, represents the official UN view...
How a Colorado business is welcoming refugees
Debates continue to rage about immigration policy and the best way to manage our range of migrant and refugee crises. Yet much of our solution-seeking seems intently focused on the levers of government. Whatever side of the political divide,we continue to hear Biblical justifications for a range of policy solutions. But however important those political considerations may be, we should remember that our basic ethic of Christian hospitality doesn’t rely or depend on decisions or decrees from the halls of...
How politics becomes religion
In his new article for the Catholic World Report, Samuel Gregg, Research Director for the Acton Institute, argues that many in the world today have replaced politics with religion. One result of this is disproportionate outrage and scandal over political events, such as Brett Kavanaugh’s recent nomination to the United States Supreme Court. On the other hand, replacing religion with politics can also lead to a watered-down, “prudentialized” theology that ignores moral absolutes and weakens the bonds of faith. Gregg...
The Left’s populist pushback
Simply defined, populism is the rebellion of mon man against the outsiders. This vague definition reflects the reality that there are populists of numerous different political persuasions; at its heart, populism is a strategy, not an ideology. Populism is dangerous because its antagonistic framework prevents proper dialogue between different groups; promise allows a morally inferior group to force its views on the people. Populism frequently panies US political movements. The Tea Party, Andrew Jackson’s war on the bank, Occupy Wall...
We can separate church and state, but not religion and politics
All our politics is religious, says Jonathan Leeman. “Neutrality is a bluff, he adds, “We are all sectarians (and conversations in the public square will e more honest when everyone names their ‘sect’). . . . Whoever gets to define which issues are ‘religious’ gets to rigs the game.” Should we therefore conclude that the the U. S. Constitution’s “no religious test for public office” clause is nothing more than an ideological power play? “Not at all,” says Leeman: In...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved