Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
A biblical theology of work, Part 2: Wealth creation
A biblical theology of work, Part 2: Wealth creation
Jan 16, 2026 3:09 PM

In Part 1 of our “theology of work” series, we examined why we work, concluding that following our calling, whatever that may be, provides us with meaning and purpose, and represents mand of God in creation. Part 2 examines the virtues of work, earning a living and using that wealth honorably.

Read More…

Wealth creation is a divine imperative, though one that generates significant responsibilities. The church fails on business and economics when leaders think only about the responsibilities of wealth and nothing at all about how that wealth is created – both are divine imperatives. Money can empower believers to provide for others, to invest in the church, and to do good works. If we believe wealth creation is a divine imperative than that implies a market economy for the creation of wealth as part of the divine dispensation.

We must not overlook the transforming power of wealth creation in God’s world. Michael Novak, in his 1991 book, “The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism,” wrote:

Of all the systems of political economy which have shaped our history, none has so revolutionized ordinary expectations of human life – lengthened the life span, made the elimination of poverty and famine thinkable, enlarged the range of human choice – as democratic capitalism.

He goes on to define democratic capitalism as a system essentially defined by a market economy and a free society. It is difficult to contest that without the market economy, society would have made significantly less progress in the fight against poverty and people would be much less free. Indeed, the United Nations, in its 2015 report on the achievement of its Millennial Goals, reported that the proportion of the world population living in extreme poverty ($1.25 per day) had dropped, between 1990 and 2015, to 14% from 47%, a reduction of nearly 70%. The middle classes had tripled.

Wealth creation as biblical imperative

The basic reason why wealth creation is a biblical imperative is that it is a mandate to create. This takes us back to the theological principles around creation and the divine mandate to work. Indeed, if there as a divine mandate to work, there must be some form of mandate to create wealth or else the mandate to work would be utterly meaningless. What we mean by a creation mandate is something which is set out by God as part of the principles of creation for all people for all time.

“The Lord God took the man and put him in the Garden of Eden to work it and keep it” (Genesis 2:15). This short verse has enormous implications. In fact, it is an mand from God. This mandate does not mean we should work for no purpose, but should instead harness the resources of God’s created world in producing goods and adding value. mand precedes the entry into the world of sin and the fall. In other words, not only work per se, but economic productivity and wealth creation are part of God’s intention for every person. This basic requirement also has implications for any government programmes that encourage dependency rather than work.

Reinforcing Genesis 2:15, there is a remarkable description of what God has provided for those who work the land. In describing the Garden of Eden and its setting in vv8-14 of Genesis 2, we read that God had provided trees and water, but that also between the head waters of the rivers which flowed out from Eden God provided three precious materials: gold, aromatic resin and onyx. In v12, we are told that the gold found in the land of Havilah is good. Divine endorsement of a crucial precious metal makes absolute sense when mand to work follows. When mand to work and bining of raw materials are put together then it makes absolute sense when the Bible described in Genesis 4 the principle of specialisation and in Ex 35:30 the principle of human development through the endowment of skills. The Bible articulates the development merce. In the creation narratives, God provides mand and the materials. Hence the creation of wealth is a spiritual imperative.

In the New Testament, we see the same emphasis set out for us in the parable of the talents in Matthew 25:14-30. Each person was equipped with an amount of money related to his abilities and they invested the capital and obtained a return (well, two of them did). Their diligence was rewarded with more. The unfaithful servant was berated for failing even to put the money on deposit. In essence, this parable is about our spiritual responsibility to use our gifts and talents to obtain economic returns though effective stewardship and investment, and a warning against an over-obsession with equality.

Wealth creation and spiritual responsibility

Having established that wealth creation is a biblical and spiritual imperative, there remains an important further aspect to examine. If we have this wealth, what do we do with it? What is the responsibility of the individual with wealth? We are not called to simply give it away and e poor (the monastic error) or to think that all responsibility for dealing with issues of poverty lies with government (the socialist error). There is no special morality attached to a government pound. Rather, the key to understanding the response to wealth lies in recognizing the variety of ways in which the New Testament deals with Luke 14:33 – So therefore, any one of you whodoes not renounce all that he has cannot be my disciple.”

What does “renounce” mean? Well, it doesn’t mean don’t make a profit – for some 20 years Jesus himself worked in his earthly father’s carpentry business which presumably made profits in order to be sustainable over that time. We know Simon and Andrew actually ran a fishing business with employees (Mark 2:20). We know that the apostles left behind their homes and livelihoods, but there is no evidence that they sold off all their possessions (Luke 5:11, 27; 18:28-30). The Rich Young Ruler, by contrast, is told to liquidate his assets and distribute them to the poor his was clearly a blockage (Luke 18:19-27), whereas Zacchaeus only promises half his goods plus restitution (Luke 19:1-10). The women disciples of Luke 8:1-3 never divest themselves of wealth, but instead use their resources to support Jesus and the Twelve on an ongoing basis. Paul works as a craftsman in order to support himself and provide for the needs of panions and those in need (Acts 20:33-35). There is also Lydia (Acts 16), a wealthy merchant who gave hospitality in her house to the believers.

Jesus demands our all. Precisely what that means spiritually for each one of us is not laid down in economic terms precisely because of the economic creation mandate to create wealth. We are then called to act in a responsible manner with that wealth.

Wealth creation then is a divine imperative which carries with it awesome responsibility. John Wesley in his sermon on money said, “Earn all you can, save all you can, give all you can. Work in the divine economy and receive blessing, indeed monetary blessing. Discharge your responsibilities well.”

A biblical theology of work, Part 1: Why work?

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The Need for Counter-Majoritarian Makeweights
Drawing on some themes I explore about the role of the church in providing material assistance inGet Your Hands Dirty, today at Political Theology Today I look at the first parliamentary speech of the new Dutch King Willem-Alexander. In “The Dutch King’s Speech,” I argue that the largely ceremonial and even constitutionally-limited monarchy has something to offer modern democratic polities, in that it provides a forum for public leadership that is not directly dependent on popular electoral support. In the...
Envy and Wanting What Others Have
Over at the University Bookman today, I review John Lanchester’s novel Capital. I mend the book. I don’t explore it in the review, “Capital Vices and Commercial Virtues,” but for those who have been following the antics of Banksy, there is a similar performance artist character in the novel that has significance for the development of the narrative. As I write in the review, the vice of envy, captured in the foreboding phrase, “We Want What You Have,” animates the...
Catholic Military Chaplaincy: War-Mongering Or Christlike Service?
Mark Scibilia-Carver, in a National Catholic Reporter “Viewpoint” piece, decries the nationwide call ing weekend for Catholics to financially support the Archdiocese for the Military Services, which serves the entire U.S. military. That includes “more than 220 installations in 29 countries, patients in 153 V.A. Medical Centers, and federal employees serving outside the boundaries of the USA in 134 countries. Numerically, the AMS is responsible for more than 1.8 million men, women, and children.” Why is Scibilia-Carver upset? He believes...
Pope Francis’ Vatican Seminar Tackles Human Trafficking
The 2013 Global Slavery Index estimates that 29.8 million people are enslaved worldwide. To help address this problem, Pope Francis called for action bat the growing problem of human trafficking and modern forms of slavery. At the pope’s request, Vatican officials and other experts met last weekend to discuss ways to better tackle the growing scourge of trafficking in humans and other forms of exploitation: Human trafficking is a crime against humanity that should be recognized as such and punished...
Sid Meier, Slot Machines, and the Flow of Vice
My wife despises Sid Meier. She’s never met him, nor would she even recognize his name. But she knows someone is responsible for creating the source of my addiction. For over twenty years I’ve spent (or wasted, as my wife would say) countless hours playing Civilization, Meier’s award-winning strategy game. Every time I play the game I enter an almost trance-like state plete immersion. According to positive psychologist Mihály Csíkszentmihályi, what I’m experiencing in that moment is known as “flow.”...
Samuel Gregg: ‘Truth has a way of making its presense felt’
Two writers over at Aleteia mented on the current state of affairs with the help of Samuel Gregg’s latest, Tea Party Catholic. Brantly Millegan, Assistant Editor for the English edition of Aleteia, write a post titled, ‘Obama’s Ordinary, No-Big-Deal “Whopper.”‘ He discusses the now infamous words President Obama spoke in 2010, “[I]f Americans like their doctor, they will keep their doctor. And if you like your insurance plan, you will keep it. No one will be able to take that...
Audio: Russell Kirk’s Final Public Lecture
Russell Kirk addresses the Acton Institute in Grand Rapids, Michigan – 1.10.94 On Saturday, November 9, the Intercollegiate Studies Institute is hosting a conference on the 60th Anniversary of Russell Kirk’sThe Conservative Mind.The conference, which will examine the impact of Kirk’s monumental book—which both named and shaped the nascent conservative movement in the United States—is to be held at the Eberhard Center on the downtown Grand Rapids campus of Grand Valley State University, which Acton supporters will recognize as the...
A Third Way Between Human and Bugger Malthusianism
I and Jordan Ballor have mented onEnder’s Game this week (here and here), but the story is literally packed with insightful themes, many of which touch upon issues relevant to Acton’s core principles. Another such issue is that of the problems with Neo-Malthusianism, the belief that overpopulation poses such a serious threat to civilization and the environment that population control measures e ethical imperatives. Such a perspective tends to rely on one or both of the following fallacies: a zero-sum...
From Too Big to Fail to Too Big to Flourish
“We hear a lot about ‘too big to fail’ banks and other financial institutions,” says Jordan Ballor in this week’s Acton Commentary. “But what about a federal government whose size and scope have e so vast as to crowd out civil institutions?” The existence of banks that are too big to fail is in significant ways the result of the actions of a government that is too big to flourish. Even a cursory glance at the federal spending figures over...
Does Advocating Limited Government Mean Abandoning the Poor?
Does promoting limited government require abandoning mitment to the poor? Ryan Messmore,whose answer is a firm “no”, argues that non-government institutions can provide personalized assistance to help individuals fix relational problems, e poverty and lead healthy lives: Calls for limited government are often mistakenly equated with a disregard for people in need. This flawed line of reasoning assumes that poverty is primarily a material problem and that government bears the primary responsibility for solving it by increasing welfare and entitlement...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved