Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
A bait and switch at Peter’s Pence?
A bait and switch at Peter’s Pence?
Nov 15, 2024 8:45 PM

The Wall Street Journal’s recent article on the Vatican’s main charitable appeal landed like a bombshell this week. And it didn’t help that we’re in the midst of the holiday giving season. The Roman Catholic Church conducts an annual collection known as Peter’s Pence, which is touted as supporting mercy ministries and serving those most in need. Shockingly, the Journal has reported that for at least the last five years “as little as 10%” of the approximately $55 million raised annually through this popular appeal has actually gone towards charitable work. The rest has gone “toward plugging the hole in the Vatican’s own administrative budget.”

Interestingly, the Journal goes on to explain that this is permissible. “Under church law, Peter’s Pence is available to the pope to use at his discretion in any way that serves his ministry, including the support of his administration,” the paper reports. Indeed, the website for Peter’s Pence mentions that receipts from the collection “also contributes to the support of the Apostolic See and the activities of the Holy See,” which “consists of the central administration of the Catholic Church and the papal diplomatic network around the world.”

That’s probably news to most people who have donated. People who have given to the collection, at least through the Peter’s Pence website, would rightly be confused and outraged that the vast majority of their money was going to administrative purposes. With the preponderance of the language and images used on the site emphasizing its charitable dimensions, one would safely assume they were giving exclusively to the vulnerable.

But it’s not just the popular collection’s website that states charity is the main purpose of the funds. The Journal’s article also mentions that:

Local church leaders echo the Vatican’s line when soliciting contributions. According to the website of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops: “The purpose of the Peter’s Pence Collection is to provide the Holy Father with the financial means to respond to those who are suffering as a result of war, oppression, natural disaster and disease.”

Given the great disparity between how it is marketed and what the vast majority of the collection is actually used for, Vatican officials have a great deal of explaining to do. People understand that administrative costs are necessary to running churches and charitable organizations. The popular charity accountability organization known as Charity Navigator states that no more than 15 percent of a charity’s revenue going toward administrative costs is acceptable. With 90 percent of its collections used for administrative costs, however, Peter’s Pence falls far short of this ideal.

News like this undoubtedly discourages giving towards charitable causes. It may cause others to swear off giving at all. We must be diligent in who we give to and hold those organizations accountable. This is especially true of our churches, whose actions serve to either exalt or diminish the name of our Savior in popular culture.

While we need to scrutinize organizations more carefully before giving to them, this should pletely stop us from doing so. There are still plenty of causes and organizations worthy of supporting sacrificially. As we consider this Christmas season what our Heavenly Father gave us through the Christ child, and what Christ Himself gave up in order to dwell among us, we can do nothing less.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Evangelicals, Scholarship, and the Acton Institute
Awhile back someone questioned the scholarly credibility of the Acton Institute on the Emerging Scholars Network (ESN) Facebook page in connection with one of our student award programs, specifically contending the institute is “not scholarly.” To be sure, not everything the institute does is academic or scholarly. But we do some scholarship, which as an academic and a scholar I like to think is worthwhile. In fact, mitment to quality research is one of the things that is most remarkable...
Stewardship and the Prodigal Son
In this week’s Acton Commentary, “Work and Prayer: Of Coins, Sheep, and Men,” I explore what the parable of the Prodigal Son (when read in conjunction with the parables of the Lost Coin and the Lost Sheep) has to teach us about stewardship: Reading these three stories together teaches us many things about the nature of God’s love for us, such that when we were lost, “While we were still sinners, Christ died for us” (Romans 5:8 NIV). But the...
A Thought for Labor Day Weekend
“Work gives meaning to life: It is the form in which we make ourselves useful to others, and thus to God.” –Lester DeKoster, Work: The Meaning of Your Life—A Christian Perspective, 2d ed. (Christian’s Library Press, 2010). ...
Jumping the Shark: Hoffa’s Rant and Rerum Novarum
James Hoffa put on quite a performance this weekend—first on CNN’s “State of the Union,” and then in Detroit at a Labor rally with President Obama. Also this weekend, President Biden revealed that the White House seems to have given up and decided America is already a “house divided,” with “barbarians at the gate” in the form of the Tea Party. Coverage of these incidents is available from whichever news outlet you trust, but there is one thing that CNN...
Billboards, Hope, and God’s Highway
Yesterday I was interviewed by WoodTV8 on a story about a controversial billboard near downtown Grand Rapids that reads, “You don’t need God – to hope, to care, to love, to live.” The billboard is sponsored by the Center for Inquiry. My reaction is that the billboard can be a positive because it serves as a conversation starter about a relationship with the Lord and what the meaning of true love and true hope is all about. When I was...
Gregg’s Take on Labor Day Debate
Yesterday, five leading Republican candidates participated in the Palmetto Freedom Forum, a serious debate on constitutional principles. Mitt Romney, Michelle Bachmann, Newt Gingrich, Ron Paul, and Herman Cain answered questions from Tea Party congressmen Jim DeMint and Steve King, and Princeton professor Robert P. George. National Review Online has gathered reactions to the debate from notable conservatives; Acton director of research Samuel Gregg and senior fellow Marvin Olasky are among them. Gregg’s take-away is that American politics is shifting in...
Big Labor Dumps Rerum Novarum
Union leaders have been jockeying for position ahead of President Obama’s “jobs speech,” since the proposals he makes will be big opportunities for organized labor. AFL-CIO head Dick Trumka has asked the president to spend with abandon, and has reminded him rather ominously, “This is going to be a moment in history when our members are going to judge him.” Teamsters boss James Hoffa has called for the President to panies with cash in the bank to spend that money...
Prerequisite for Life: The Man Class
Writing in the Detroit News about the latest rash of shootings in the city (nine dead and 20 injured), Luther Keith asks, “Haven’t we been around this track before?” Yes, actually. He lays out a list of measures to address the crime problem including some predictable (police, gun buybacks, recreational programs) and, refreshingly, something more promising, more powerful: “Emphasize personal responsibility. It es down to choices — right ones and wrong ones, good ones and bad ones and the willingness...
Guest Review: Schmalhofer on Roberts
The Price of Everything: A Parable of Possibility and Prosperity Russell Roberts Princeton University Press (2008); 224 pages; $9.69 Reviewed by Stephen Schmalhofer I hated freshman economics at Yale. It was the only C I ever received. Taught in a massive lecture hall, the professor posted endless equations and formulas. I found it sterile and artificial. My father was the CEO of a pany in rural Pennsylvania. I wandered the production facility as a child and saw chickens hatched in...
How to Deliver a Recession: Cut Brake Lines, Accelerate Toward Cliff
Economic historian Brian Domitrovic has an interesting post up at his Forbes blog, Past & Present, on the proximate causes of the 2008 meltdown. According to Domitrovic, uncoordinated, even “weird” fiscal and budgetary policy in the early 2000s kept investors on the sidelines, and then flooded the system with easy money. The chickens came home to roost in 2008 (and they’re still perched in the coop). In 2000, as the stock market was treading water in the context of the...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2024 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved