Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
9/11: An anti-capitalist jihad
9/11: An anti-capitalist jihad
Sep 19, 2024 6:14 PM

“As you liberated yourselves before from the slavery of monks, kings, and feudalism, you should liberate yourselves from the deception, shackles, and attrition of the capitalist system.” This es, not from theCommunist ManifestoorDas Kapital, but a speech delivered by Osama bin Laden just before the sixth anniversary of 9/11.

In the tragedy that grips our hearts every year on this date, it’s vital that we understand the ideology that fueled the worst act of terrorism in U.S. history. The theology ofjihadismand extreme fundamentalist Islam has been explored in depth, if not appreciated to the same degree. However, little attention has been paid to the role that anti-capitalism played in Osama bin Laden’s twisted worldview.

In the same video – released September 7, 2007 – bin Ladenlashed outat the West’s free market economy:

If you were to ponder it well, you would find that in the end, it is a system harsher and fiercer than your systems in the Middle Ages. The capitalist system seeks to turn the entire world into a fiefdom of the major corporations under the label of “globalization” in order to protect democracy.

And Iraq and Afghanistan and their tragedies; and the reeling of many of you under the burden of interest-related debts, insane taxes and real estate mortgages; global warming and its woes; and the abject poverty and tragic hunger in Africa: all of this is but one side of the grim face of this global system.

In the eyes of the most determined anti-American terrorist in recent history, the War on Terror was a product of Western capitalism.

Capitalism and imperialism long topped Osama bin Laden’s list of grievances. In his1997 interviewwith Peter Arnett, plained that the United States had artificially lowered the price of oil through the mechanism of supply-and-demand. “We believe that the current prices are not realistic due to the Saudi regime playing the role of a US agent and the pressures exercised by the US on the Saudi regime to increase production and flooding the market that caused a sharp decrease in oil prices,” he said. “The U.S. today, as a result of the arrogant atmosphere, has set a double standard … [and] wants to occupy our countries [and] steal our resources.”

The idea of evil Western corporationsplunderingthe Global South is a well-established leftist trope. For economic interventionists, capitalism is by natureexploitative. As all the world’s ills are attributed to free exchange, terrorists and socialists sometimes mon ground in justifying violence.

Professor Ward Churchill, who then chaired the ethnic studies department at the University of Colorado at Boulder,wrotejust after 9/11 that civilians slain in the Pentagon were “military targets,” because they controlled America’s war machine. Then he proceeded to analyze those in the twin towers:

As to those in the World Trade Center . . .

Well, really. Let’s get a grip here, shall we? True enough, they were civilians of a sort. But innocent? Gimme a break. They formed a technocratic corps at the very heart of America’s global financial empire – the “mighty engine of profit” to which the military dimension of U.S. policy has always been enslaved – and they did so both willingly and knowingly. … To the extent that any of them were unaware of the costs and consequences to others of what they were involved in – and in many cases excelling at – it was because of their absolute refusal to see. More likely, it was because they were too busy braying, incessantly and self-importantly, into their cell phones, arranging power lunches and stock transactions, each of which translated, conveniently out of sight, mind and smelling distance, into the starved and rotting flesh of infants. If there was a better, more effective, or in fact any other way of visiting some penalty befitting their participation upon the little Eichmanns inhabiting the sterile sanctuary of the twin towers, I’d really be interested in hearing about it.

His remarks eerily presaged those of bin Laden himself, who just a month later would use identical language tojustifyhis attack on the World Trade Center:

The towers are an economic power and not a children’s school. Those that were there are men that supported the biggest economic power in the world. They have to review their books. We will do as they do. If they kill our women and our innocent people, we will kill their women and their innocent people until they stop.

Ward Churchill would be concerning were he alone, yet other thought-leaders shared in the efforts to whitewash bin Laden as a victim of stockbrokers and corporate middle managers.

Robert Paul Churchill (no relation), then the chair of George Washington University’s philosophy department,wrotethat “[t]he terrorists’ ‘war’ against America is more than anything else an iconographic war, and therefore it was aimed at dominant symbols, or icons, of what is globally regarded as the American way of life”:

What the terrorists despised and sought to defeat was our arrogance, our gluttonous way of life, our miserliness toward the poor and starving; the exportation of a soulless pop culture of Madonna, hip hop, lewd entertainment, Levi’s, coke [sic], and the golden arches; and a domineering attitude that insists on having our own way no matter what the cost to others. Unfortunately, the American way of life is now associated by millions of the world’s citizens with exploitation, oppression, and humiliation.

As time went on, Osama bin Laden’s public statements would lean more heavily on his critique of capitalism. The words and syntax of the American Left crept into his incitements tojihad. He criticized the United States for not adopting the Kyoto Protocol and contributing to global climate change. He mentioned that he read Noam Chomsky and watched films by Michael Moore.

As the world’s foremost terrorist mastermind tried to radicalize a segment of fundamentalist Islam, his economic views were being radicalized by American socialists.

It is clear that bin Laden either embraced anti-capitalist views or found its arguments suited his purposes (which, for clarity’s sake, is the destruction of the United States and the Western way of life).

We who mourn the thousands of victims buried beneath fiery rubble at Ground Zero should defend the system the terrorists tried to destroy. Free exchange, while imperfect, is the greatest engine of prosperity, innovation, and freedom ever devised. The World Banknotesthat “more than 850 million people have lifted themselves out of poverty” in China alone since the nationsubstitutedcapitalism for socialism in 1978. Even U.S. Census data released on the eve of this memorationshowAmericans prospering as the economy is freed through lower taxes and regulations.

Beyond the physical benefits, the free market gives people the resources to live life as they see fit – even if it means ignoring the dictates of al-Qaeda’s version of Islam. This is the true locus of terrorists’ hatred of the Western liberal order.

To be sure, the attacks of 9/11 extend far beyond a critique of an economic system. Their greatest objection is our freedom of religion – the fruit of America’s founding philosophy. Today, that value is also caught in a two-front war, with secularists intent on eradicating the influence of religion in public life and Catholic Integralists hellbent (I use that term advisedly) on totalizing it.

Eighteen years later, the war for the soul of the West continues. It always will.

In October 2001, Osama bin Laden boasted of destroying the entire edifice of the West. “The values of this Western civilization under the leadership of America have been destroyed,” bin Laden said. “Those awesome symbolic towers that speak of liberty, human rights, and humanity have been destroyed. They have gone up in smoke.”

But no foreign power can level another civilization except through total annihilation. Cultures must be destroyed from within. From the remnants of 9/11, the West arose and endured. As long as citizens of the West uphold liberty, Judeo-Christian values, liberal democracy, free exchange, and human rights, 9/11 will remain a failure, and freedom’s beacon will continue burning bright.

Machine Stops. This photo has been cropped. CC BY-SA 2.0.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Getting Beyond Right-Wing and Left-Wing
The stark polarization that marks our politics may be more a misclassification of certain positions. A little history lesson is in order. Read More… Back in the 1970s, Sixty Minutes had a regular feature called Point/Counterpoint, which came at the end of every show. Each week there would be a different topic. Journalist Shana Alexander would present a standard-issue “liberal” version of the argument while James J. Kilpatrick assumed the “conservative” side. Although the sparring partners sniped at one another,...
The Strange Death of DEI
More Americans than you think support training in diversity, equity, and inclusion. And why are more and more corporations looking beyond it? Read More… Once considered the highest rising feature of America’s business spaces, the cliffs of corporate diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) are slowly eroding under the reliable and unrelenting tide of American apathy. Fewer and fewer businesses are seeking to hire a chief diversity officer, and those who manage to get hired are finding their jobs often paired...
Tom Wolfe and the Strangeness of America
A new documentary about the parable novelist and social critic demonstrates, however unintentionally, why we’ll probably never see the likes of Wolfe again. Read More… Conservatism doesn’t really produce or nurture writers nowadays. The notable exception in the past couple of generations is Tom Wolfe, who died in 2018. Wolfe was universally beloved. He sold millions of copies of his various writings. Wolfe had a distinctive Southern-gentleman plete with “trademark white suit and vest, a high-necked blue-and-white-striped plemented by a...
Willmoore Kendall and the Meaning of American Conservatism
Less well-known than Kirk and Buckley, the pugnacious and discerning Kendall is nevertheless a voice that needs to be revived in the present fractious moment. Read More… In our moment, the nature and meaning of conservatism is disputed, sometimes hotly, and it’s unsurprising to observe participants turn to history for wisdom or support. Either in praise or vilification, current schools frequently mention John Courtney Murray, Russell Kirk, Frank Meyer, Irving Kristol, and William F. Buckley (obviously), among others. The appropriation...
Claudia Goldin Is the Ideal Academic Researcher
The latest recipient of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences has contributed much useful data in understanding the role of women in the workforce. Her restraint in policy prescriptions may, in fact, be her greatest contribution of all. Read More… Harvard’s Claudia Goldin is our newest Nobel laureate in economics. Her accumulated efforts have helped us better understand women’s roles in the labor market—both historically and in contemporary society. It’s worth noting that the economics prize isn’t one of...
How Did George Orwell Know?
For those trapped behind the Iron Curtain, Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four seemed more a documentary than a work of dystopian fiction. How did a man who had never traveled munist Russia get so much so right? Read More… The collocation in the title captures the thoroughgoing exploration of the topic in a phrase: George Orwell and Russia. Masha Karp is not the first to ponder George Orwell’s relationship to Stalinist Russia—and the relationship of both Stalinist and munist Russia to Orwell—but...
Is Neoliberalism Dead?
The Chilean Miracle of the 1990s is usually pointed to as a win for the Chicago School of economics, which advocated laissez faire capitalism, limited regulation, and cuts in government spending. But that was then, and this is the era of Bidenomics and a “post-liberal” New Right. Are free markets as dead as General Pinochet? Read More… Louis Menand wrote a curious article for the New Yorker called “The Rise and Fall of Neoliberalism.” The article is curious on two...
No, Chicago, We Don’t Need Government-Run Grocery Stores
After Walmart shuttered locations due to rising crime, the mayor of Chicago decided the answer was to … open their own grocery stores. What could go wrong? Read More… The city of Chicago is plagued by waves of violence, looting, and plunder dating back to 2020, which was deemed “the summer of looting” by the Chicago Tribune, spurred by the murder of George Floyd while in police custody amid COVID lockdowns. That summer, the Chicago police superintendent called for longer...
Laudate Deum: Or, Is the Catholic Church Just Another NGO?
Is there a way to balance economic growth and sound environmental stewardship? If only Pope Francis would take his own advice. Read More… If there is anything we have learned about Pope mentaries on issues ranging from economics to the environment, it is that they invariably add up to a by-now predictable mixture. Parts of this mélange consist of often profound insights and wisdom. But it also reflects straw man arguments, the random assembling of pieces of data plucked out...
John Newton: From Slave Trader to Abolitionist Pastor
The story of John Newton’s conversion is legendary. His hymns, like “Amazing Grace,” perennial favorites. His pastor’s heart, exemplary. His fight for an abolition of the slave trade, monumental. But none of this came quickly or easily. Read More… John Newton (1725–1807) is a pivotal figure in the English evangelical revival or awakening. His is an early example of a settled evangelical ministry in the second half of the 18th century, involving pastoral work, hymn-writing, and even mentoring the likes...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2024 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved