Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
9/11: An anti-capitalist jihad
9/11: An anti-capitalist jihad
Jan 21, 2026 10:47 PM

“As you liberated yourselves before from the slavery of monks, kings, and feudalism, you should liberate yourselves from the deception, shackles, and attrition of the capitalist system.” This es, not from theCommunist ManifestoorDas Kapital, but a speech delivered by Osama bin Laden just before the sixth anniversary of 9/11.

In the tragedy that grips our hearts every year on this date, it’s vital that we understand the ideology that fueled the worst act of terrorism in U.S. history. The theology ofjihadismand extreme fundamentalist Islam has been explored in depth, if not appreciated to the same degree. However, little attention has been paid to the role that anti-capitalism played in Osama bin Laden’s twisted worldview.

In the same video – released September 7, 2007 – bin Ladenlashed outat the West’s free market economy:

If you were to ponder it well, you would find that in the end, it is a system harsher and fiercer than your systems in the Middle Ages. The capitalist system seeks to turn the entire world into a fiefdom of the major corporations under the label of “globalization” in order to protect democracy.

And Iraq and Afghanistan and their tragedies; and the reeling of many of you under the burden of interest-related debts, insane taxes and real estate mortgages; global warming and its woes; and the abject poverty and tragic hunger in Africa: all of this is but one side of the grim face of this global system.

In the eyes of the most determined anti-American terrorist in recent history, the War on Terror was a product of Western capitalism.

Capitalism and imperialism long topped Osama bin Laden’s list of grievances. In his1997 interviewwith Peter Arnett, plained that the United States had artificially lowered the price of oil through the mechanism of supply-and-demand. “We believe that the current prices are not realistic due to the Saudi regime playing the role of a US agent and the pressures exercised by the US on the Saudi regime to increase production and flooding the market that caused a sharp decrease in oil prices,” he said. “The U.S. today, as a result of the arrogant atmosphere, has set a double standard … [and] wants to occupy our countries [and] steal our resources.”

The idea of evil Western corporationsplunderingthe Global South is a well-established leftist trope. For economic interventionists, capitalism is by natureexploitative. As all the world’s ills are attributed to free exchange, terrorists and socialists sometimes mon ground in justifying violence.

Professor Ward Churchill, who then chaired the ethnic studies department at the University of Colorado at Boulder,wrotejust after 9/11 that civilians slain in the Pentagon were “military targets,” because they controlled America’s war machine. Then he proceeded to analyze those in the twin towers:

As to those in the World Trade Center . . .

Well, really. Let’s get a grip here, shall we? True enough, they were civilians of a sort. But innocent? Gimme a break. They formed a technocratic corps at the very heart of America’s global financial empire – the “mighty engine of profit” to which the military dimension of U.S. policy has always been enslaved – and they did so both willingly and knowingly. … To the extent that any of them were unaware of the costs and consequences to others of what they were involved in – and in many cases excelling at – it was because of their absolute refusal to see. More likely, it was because they were too busy braying, incessantly and self-importantly, into their cell phones, arranging power lunches and stock transactions, each of which translated, conveniently out of sight, mind and smelling distance, into the starved and rotting flesh of infants. If there was a better, more effective, or in fact any other way of visiting some penalty befitting their participation upon the little Eichmanns inhabiting the sterile sanctuary of the twin towers, I’d really be interested in hearing about it.

His remarks eerily presaged those of bin Laden himself, who just a month later would use identical language tojustifyhis attack on the World Trade Center:

The towers are an economic power and not a children’s school. Those that were there are men that supported the biggest economic power in the world. They have to review their books. We will do as they do. If they kill our women and our innocent people, we will kill their women and their innocent people until they stop.

Ward Churchill would be concerning were he alone, yet other thought-leaders shared in the efforts to whitewash bin Laden as a victim of stockbrokers and corporate middle managers.

Robert Paul Churchill (no relation), then the chair of George Washington University’s philosophy department,wrotethat “[t]he terrorists’ ‘war’ against America is more than anything else an iconographic war, and therefore it was aimed at dominant symbols, or icons, of what is globally regarded as the American way of life”:

What the terrorists despised and sought to defeat was our arrogance, our gluttonous way of life, our miserliness toward the poor and starving; the exportation of a soulless pop culture of Madonna, hip hop, lewd entertainment, Levi’s, coke [sic], and the golden arches; and a domineering attitude that insists on having our own way no matter what the cost to others. Unfortunately, the American way of life is now associated by millions of the world’s citizens with exploitation, oppression, and humiliation.

As time went on, Osama bin Laden’s public statements would lean more heavily on his critique of capitalism. The words and syntax of the American Left crept into his incitements tojihad. He criticized the United States for not adopting the Kyoto Protocol and contributing to global climate change. He mentioned that he read Noam Chomsky and watched films by Michael Moore.

As the world’s foremost terrorist mastermind tried to radicalize a segment of fundamentalist Islam, his economic views were being radicalized by American socialists.

It is clear that bin Laden either embraced anti-capitalist views or found its arguments suited his purposes (which, for clarity’s sake, is the destruction of the United States and the Western way of life).

We who mourn the thousands of victims buried beneath fiery rubble at Ground Zero should defend the system the terrorists tried to destroy. Free exchange, while imperfect, is the greatest engine of prosperity, innovation, and freedom ever devised. The World Banknotesthat “more than 850 million people have lifted themselves out of poverty” in China alone since the nationsubstitutedcapitalism for socialism in 1978. Even U.S. Census data released on the eve of this memorationshowAmericans prospering as the economy is freed through lower taxes and regulations.

Beyond the physical benefits, the free market gives people the resources to live life as they see fit – even if it means ignoring the dictates of al-Qaeda’s version of Islam. This is the true locus of terrorists’ hatred of the Western liberal order.

To be sure, the attacks of 9/11 extend far beyond a critique of an economic system. Their greatest objection is our freedom of religion – the fruit of America’s founding philosophy. Today, that value is also caught in a two-front war, with secularists intent on eradicating the influence of religion in public life and Catholic Integralists hellbent (I use that term advisedly) on totalizing it.

Eighteen years later, the war for the soul of the West continues. It always will.

In October 2001, Osama bin Laden boasted of destroying the entire edifice of the West. “The values of this Western civilization under the leadership of America have been destroyed,” bin Laden said. “Those awesome symbolic towers that speak of liberty, human rights, and humanity have been destroyed. They have gone up in smoke.”

But no foreign power can level another civilization except through total annihilation. Cultures must be destroyed from within. From the remnants of 9/11, the West arose and endured. As long as citizens of the West uphold liberty, Judeo-Christian values, liberal democracy, free exchange, and human rights, 9/11 will remain a failure, and freedom’s beacon will continue burning bright.

Machine Stops. This photo has been cropped. CC BY-SA 2.0.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Work as if It Mattered
The conversations over the last few weeks here on work have raised a couple of questions. In the context of criticisms on the perspectives on work articulated by Lester DeKoster and defended by menter John E. asks, “…what is it that you hope readers will change in their lives, and why?” I want to change people’s view of their work. I want them to see how it has value not simply as a means to some other end, but in...
The Daily Show Takes on a Union
The Daily Show exposes some union hypocrisy (HT). In the words of the union local head, es down to greed”: ...
Journal of Religion and Business Ethics
The latest issue of the newly launched Journal of Religion and Business Ethics is now available (vol. 1, no. 2). Check out the contents at their website. From the journal’s about page: “The Journal of Religion and Business Ethics is a peer-reviewed journal that examines the ethical and religious issues that arise in the modern business setting. While much attention has been given to the philosophical treatment of business ethics, this is the first journal to address the more inclusive...
Rev. Sirico: Respect others’ rights, but also their values
A new column by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, president and co-founder of the Acton Institute, was published today in the Detroit News. This column will also be linked in tomorrow’s Acton News & Commentary. Sign up for the free weekly Acton newsletter here. +++++++++ Faith and policy: Respect others’ rights, but also their values FATHER ROBERT SIRICO If such an award were to be given for the Most Contentious Religious Story of 2010, the two main contenders would undoubtedly be...
The Politics of Crony Unionism
Last week’s Acton Commentary and blog post focused on my claims about “crony unionism” and how the intimate relationship between Big Labor and Big Government corrupt both. Here’s another instance of the kinds of gross conflicts of interest produced by this relationship: It’s hard to see this as anything but partisan pandering on the part of the largest public sector union, the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME). Meanwhile, the Washington Post asks, “Was politics behind the...
A Lesson from Michigan: Time to End Crony Unionism
In this week’s Acton Commentary, I take a look at the prospects of “right-to-work” legislation in Michigan, “A Lesson from Michigan: Time to End Crony Unionism.” One of the things that disturbs me the most about what I call “crony unionism” is the hand-in-glove relationship between the labor unions and big government. We have the same kind of special pleading and rent seeking in this system as we do in crony capitalism, but the labor unions enjoy such special protection...
Mandating Monolithic Medicine
Among the warnings sounded as the Democratic health care reform bill was being debated was that the federal insurance mandate included in the bill—even though not national health care per se—would essentially give the federal government control of the insurance industry. The reason: If everyone is forced to buy insurance, then the government must deem what sort of insurance qualifies as adequate to meet the mandate. This piece of Obamacare promises to turn every medical procedure into a major political...
Explaining the New Democratic Logo
“The new Democratic logo is so bad that the intellectual rot in the official announcement went largely unnoticed.” The rest of my piece is here at The American Spectator. ...
Radio Free Acton: The Stewardship of Art, Part 2
Last week, we posted part 1 of our podcast on the proper Christian stewardship of art; for those who have been waiting for the conclusion, we’re happy to present part 2. David Michael Phelps continues to lead the discussion between Professors Nathan Jacobs and Calvin Seerveld, who previously debated this topic in the Controversy section of our Journal of Markets & Morality. The first portion of that exchange is available at the link for part 1; the remainder of the...
Envy: A Deadly (Economic) Sin
Victor Claar, Acton University lecturer and professor of economics at Henderson State University, will give a talk tonight in Washington, D.C., hosted by AEI, “Grieving the Good of Others: Envy and Economics.” If you are in the area, you are encouraged to attend and hear Dr. Claar as well as two respondents discuss the topic of envy and its moral and economic consequences. Here’s a description of the event: Critics of capitalism often argue that this economic system is irretrievably...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved