Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
80% of the globe is ‘religious restricted’: UN hearing
80% of the globe is ‘religious restricted’: UN hearing
Apr 9, 2026 4:54 PM

Freedom of religion is denied in much of the world, according to the U.S. ambassador for religious freedom. And a United mittee of NGOs dedicated to religious liberty has called the UN to protect the most fundamental freedom.

“Eighty percent of the world’s population lives in a religiously restricted atmosphere,” Sam Brownback told mittee. “Eighty percent of the world is religious. How can we tolerate this continuing situation?”

He recounted harrowing tales of persecution that he had personally witnessed, especially in the Middle East.

“In Iraq we’ve seen a genocide of Yazidis and Christians, and I’ve met myself Yazidi women sold up to 10 times by ISIS fighters claiming a religious mandate to be able to do this,” Brownback said. “I’ve talked to a woman who had a 15-year-old mentally handicapped child beat out of her arms, that they said they could take him from her … because of her faith.”

Hajnalka Juhasz, part of Hungary’s mission on Christian persecution, recounted the statistics of Christians fleeing their native lands as the terrorist caliphate expanded.

“The greatest achievement for Western civilization, democracy, is founded on our shared values of tolerance and individual freedom,” Juhasz said. “These values originate in the Middle East, the cradle of Judaism and Christianity.”

She warned that mission finds the freedom of religion facing increasing restrictions in the West, as well – something other watchdogs have amplified.

The UN has been part of the problem, according to the Alliance Defending Freedom, which has issued a 48-page white paper on global religious persecution. “The focus among UN entities, from treaty bodies to special rapporteurs to UN agencies, is limiting the exercise of conscientious objection” to providing abortion or potentially abortifacient contraception.

An ecumenical group of Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Christian leaders in Europe shared similar concerns in a 2017 statement. They warned that Christians in Europe suffer “more subtle forms of discrimination,” such as “when they areexcludedfrom certain rolesor professions, when their right to conscientious objection is disregarded, or when persons who requestcounselling when faced with the choice of performing an abortion have that request denied.”

Archbishop Ignatius Kaigama said persecution, of any religion by any other religion “gives the wrong impression that religion is a force for evil.” That, too, echoes present realities in the West. Most Scandinavians and many Europeans believe religion has had a negative impact on history, and 53 percent of Western Europeans describe themselves as neither religious nor spiritual.

Interfaith tension is fed, in part, by government policy. Brownback said he just returned from a regional summit in Abu Dhabi to address “hateful” material in school textbooks directed against religious minorities in the Middle East, especially Christians and Jews.

These textbooks, he noted, were funded by the respective national governments. They may, indeed, have been financed in part by the religious minorities demonized in the texts.

A particularly heated moment came in the question-and-answer session, when the representative from China objected to characterizations of his nation’s persecution of its Uighur Muslim population.

The mass imprisonment of China’s religious minority population was carried out “in accordance with law,” in response to terrorist attacks, and to prevent the formation of a budding Boko Haram, he said.

Thomas Farr of the Religious Freedom Institute called the statement offensive and outrageous.

“This is what causes terrorism,” Farr responded. “This is tantamount to a new Cultural Revolution in China. The entire world condemns what’s happening there.”

Brownback called for “a global movement of religious freedom” that has “carrots and teeth associated with it” at the meeting, held in Geneva on March 1.

Archbishop Kaigama called for an end to inciting religious hatred.

“Sanity, not sentiments, must prevail in matters of religion,” he said. “Competition in matters of religion should only be about doing good.”

You can watch the full proceedings below:

Defending Freedom. Used with permission.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The ‘P’ Word
This guy fails the ‘anthropological Rorshach’ test: Jonathon Porritt, who chairs the government’s Sustainable Development Commission, says curbing population growth through contraception and abortion must be at the heart of policies to fight global warming. He says political leaders and green campaigners should stop dodging the issue of environmental harm caused by an expanding population. The 2 child limit that Porritt encourages is not just an attempt to limit population growth, but is instead a policy that would put the...
Acton Commentary: Hollywood’s Radical Che Chic
Was the real Che Guevara a lover of “humanity, justice and truth”? In mentary today, Bruce Edward Walker reviews Steven Soderbergh’s new four-hour “Che” film epic and discovers “a cinematic paean to one of the twentieth-century’s most infamous butchers.” Read the mentary at the Acton Institute website. ...
Of Men, Mountains, and Mining
Here’s a brief report from The Environmental Report on mountain-top removal mining, and the increasing involvement of religious groups weighing in on the question. One of these groups is Christians for the Mountains. A quote by the group’s co-founder Allen Johnson was noteworthy, “We cannot destroy God’s creation in order to have a temporal economy.” One other thing that struck me about the interview is that the AmeriCorp involvement smacks of “rebranding” secular environmentalism. Add the magic words “creation care”...
Acton Commentary: The Moral Bankruptcy Behind the Bailouts
Amid the Washington clamor for more and bigger bailouts, a few brave voices among elected officials and government veterans are being raised about the moral disaster looming behind massive government spending programs. If we ignore these warnings, writes Ray Nothstine in today’s Acton Commentary, we may be “continuing down a path that may usher in an ever greater financial crisis.” Read the mentary here and share ments below. ...
Vatican Condemnation of anti-Semitism Unchanged Despite Misstep on Holocaust Denier
The pope has certainly earned his salary this week. In his attempt to heal a schism, he inadvertently set off a fire storm. As most everyone knows by now, the pontiff lifted the munication of four bishops illicitly ordained by the late Archbishop Marcel Lefevbre in 1988, whose dissent from the Second Vatican Council drew a small but fervent following. One of these bishops, Richard Williamson, is a holocaust denier. To understand the saga, it is necessary to peel back...
PBR: What is Wrong with Socialism?
This week we introduce a new regular feature we’re calling “PowerBlog Ramblings” (PBR). The concept is simple: we’ll post a question along with some background for why that question has been selected, and various PowerBlog contributors and guests will respond to that question. We’ve named this feature “PowerBlog Ramblings” in part as an allusion to the publication with which the institute’s namesake Lord Acton was closely associated for a time, The Rambler, which was in part aimed “to provide a...
More on ‘The Moral Bankruptcy Behind the Bailouts’
“Government budgets are moral documents,” is the often quoted line from Jim Wallis of Sojourners and other religious left leaders. Wallis also adds that “When politicians present their budgets, they are really presenting their priorities.” There is perhaps no better example of a spending bill lacking moral soundness than the current stimulus package being debated in the U.S. Senate. In mentary this week, “The Moral Bankruptcy Behind the Bailouts,” I offer clear reasons how spending more does not equate to...
PBR: History Casts Doubt
In response to the question, “What is wrong with socialism?” I can hardly do better than Pope John Paul II, who wrote in Centesimus Annus, “the fundamental error of socialism is anthropological in nature,” because socialism maintains, “that the good of the individual can be realized without reference to his free choice.” The socialist experiment is attractive because its model is the family, a situation in which each gives according to his ability and receives according to his need—and it...
PBR: Socialism Tyrannizes
In response to the question, “What is wrong with socialism?” In answering this question we could point to the historical instances of socialist regimes and their abhorrent record on treatment of human beings. But the supporters of socialism might just as well argue that these examples are not truly relevant because each historical instance of socialism has particular contextual corruptions. Thus, these regimes have never really manifested the ideal that socialism offers. So on a more abstract or ideal level,...
PBR: Aristotle on What is Wrong with Socialism
In response to the question, “What is wrong with socialism?” Writing well over 2000 years ago, Aristotle answered Plato, whose Republic advocated socialism, thusly: What mon to the greatest number gets the least amount of care. People pay most attention to what is their own: they care less for what mon; or, at any rate, they care for it only to the extent to which each is individually concerned. Even when there is no other cause for inattention, people are...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved