Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
50 Years On, Cellphones Have Shown the Way for Inclusive Global Progress
50 Years On, Cellphones Have Shown the Way for Inclusive Global Progress
Jul 18, 2025 7:49 PM

One simple device that virtually no one could afford has now e ubiquitous, and an accelerant of economic and social growth, especially among the world’s poorest. What’s the next best gadget, and how do we get it into the hands of the e people?

Read More…

Today, April 3, 2023, is the 50th anniversary of mercial introduction of cellphones. On this day in 1973, Martin Cooper of Motorola used a cellphone to place a call from Manhattan to the headquarters of Bell Labs in New Jersey. This simple act ushered in the age of cellphones worldwide. Today there are more than 5.3 billion people in the world using cellphones —a number almost equivalent to the active adult population of the entire world. The 5.3 billion figure represents the number of unique users; the actual number of cellphones exceeds the world population of 8 billion because many people have more than one such device.

We all know the many conveniences cellphones afford us. We’re able to be in constant touch with friends, family, and colleagues no matter where we go. Many kinds of connectivity have flourished via cellphones. Beyond munications, we now text and email, and exchange photos, videos, and files through our phones. The way the cellphone has transformed our lives for better and worse is a frequent topic mentary and reflection.

What’s less noted is the dramatic impact the advent of the cellphone has had on global inclusiveness and prosperity. To appreciate this, we need to look back 50 yearsto when the global population stood at 4 billion people. At that time, there were close to 300 million landline phones in distribution, more than 90% of which were in the wealthiest nations: the U.S., Canada, Japan, New Zealand, Australia, and the nations of Western Europe. In other words, about 10% of the world’s population enjoyed the use of 90% of the phones. At that time, 1 in 1,000 people had a cellphone in the e nations of the world, places like India, China, Pakistan, the countries of Africa, and the like. Today, although the wealthy world has far better access to education, housing, healthcare, transportation, nutrition, and other day-to-day necessities pared to the poorest of the world, there is nevertheless a rough parity between rich and poor when es to cellphone use. By “rough parity,” I mean about a 10% difference. That is, roughly 80% of the overall population, including children, in wealthy nations have cellphones, and about 70% of the e world do as well.

Technologies generally spread from the rich (who can afford to be early adopters) to the poor. Someone who saw immediately what cellphones could mean in the hands of the poor and labored to get them early into the hands of some of the e people was Iqbal Quadir, now a senior fellow at Harvard University. His proactive efforts can shed light on the full impact of the cellphone for global progress.

In 1992 cell service began to be digitized. Quadir, at that time an investment professional on Wall Street, was familiar with Moore’s Law. Named for Gordon Moore, the co-founder of Intel who passed away late last month, Moore’s Law expects processing power to double—and prices to halve—every two-year period. For example, $1,000 worth of microchips today could be available for $1 in 20 years. Quadir reasoned that using increasingly cheap processing power would swiftly give cellphones more capabilities, including making them both more user-friendly and affordable for e people.

Quadir abandoned his lucrative Wall Street career and plunged into a new mission: to bring cellphones to every corner of his native Bangladesh in 1993. The country had about 120 million people at that time, and roughly one phone for every 400 Bangladeshis. To understand the uphill struggle Quadir’s vision represented, it is enough to say that in 1993, a digital cellphone cost about $500, while the per capita GDP of Bangladesh was less than $300. In 1993, even in the wealthy United States, only 1% of people used a digital cellphone. No one thought they could be sustainably introduced into Bangladesh. Nevertheless, Quadir reasoned that a digital cellphone would be supremely useful to the lowest e people. If such phones could be made available to poor people, their lives would improve and their es would rise, which would in turn translate into the ability to pay for cellphone service. Just as ice hockey legend Wayne Gretzky as been quoted as saying that he focused on where the puck was going to be and not where it had been, in 1993 Quadir could see where cellphones would be in a decade’s time, and started from there.

Quadir particularly wanted to reach his country’s poorest. He approached Grameen Bank, a microcredit organization, which lent to the e people. He named his new pany “Grameenphone” at the request of the bank. Today pany serves just under 50%, or more than 80 million, of the phones in Bangladesh, a country that has slightly more phones than its population of 165 million. Everyone recognizes that Bangladesh has been transformed, and the GDP per capita is now approaching 10 times as much as in 1993—close to $3,000. There are other factors that have contributed Bangladesh’s progress, but Quadir’s introduction of munication tools has undoubtedly been a prominent transformative force.

One can discern five significant, positive benefits of putting cellphones into the hands of the poor. First, it improves people’s lives, as they are better able to keep in touch with friends and family. Second, it allows a user to plish more in less time, allowing her to earn more by making her more efficient. Third, higher earnings allow her to pay for the cellphone service, and this connectivity makes it possible mercial ventures to take root and prosper. Fourth, higher earnings of individual consumers add up, giving rise to higher GDP for the country. Fifth, the higher es spent on other consumer goods gives rise to entrepreneurs who meet the rising demand. This is the way of economic progress in developing countries.

Quadir thinks that Grameenphone has shown the way to economic growth and that the munity should foster the introduction of other empowering tools. Putting more innovations, such as solar panels, small windmills, even novel medical devices, into the hands of the e individuals in the world will empower them to develop into more self-sufficient and productive individuals—and will do so not at the expense of the rich but by way of boosting exports. This is no zero-sum game. Here, everyone wins.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Markets and culture: A time to play, a time to pray
Faced with the prospect of a professional athletic career, a nearly-half million dollar salary, and a perfect lady, what’s not to like? Apparently, for Grant Desme, it was the noise and unrest of the world. Can a culture of life and the noise and tumult of the marketplace co-exist? Rev. Robert Sirico, reflecting on this, says they can, so long as it is not a place where: [C]apitalism…places the human person at the mercy of blind economic forces…What we propose,...
How were people On Call in Culture 165 years ago?
What is so special about 1837? That was the year Abraham Kuyper was born. September 29th is his 165th birthday. So we thought we would go back to 1837 and see how people were being On Call in Culture back then. We don’t know if they were all believers on a mission to bless the world, but by seeing what was going on 165 years ago, we hope you are encouraged to engage your world in 2012! How did people...
Is it really ‘aid’ if it goes to relatively wealthy nations?
Alan Duncan, an aid minister in the UK, says his government is “forced” to hand over large amounts of money to the EU’s foreign aid budget, but has no say in how the money is spent. The problem is that much of the $2 billion+ “aid” money (one-sixth of the British budget) goes to projects such as making a Moroccan water park more eco-friendly, an art project in St. Petersburg, and building a hotel and plex in Barbados. Britain’s International...
Counting the Profit of a Third Party Choice
Joe Carter recently highlighted the discussion at Ethika Politika, the journal of the Center for Morality in Public Life, about the value of (not) voting, particularly the suggestion by Andrew Haines that in some cases there is a moral duty not to vote. This morning I respond with an analysis of the consequences of not voting, ultimately arguing that one must not neglect to count the cost of abstaining to vote for any particular office. One issue, however, that I...
Stop Apologizing for Our Liberties
You cannot apologize to a fanatic, says Lee Harris. It only serves to convince him that he was right all along: The last few weeks have witnessed a peculiar and disturbing spectacle: An American administration that has spent a great deal of time and energy apologizing for our liberties—in particular, for what many would regard as the foundation of all our other liberties, namely, the freedom to express our minds as we see fit. This signature freedom, of which Americans...
Dodd-Frank: The Other Serious Threat
At least es at us head on. The greater legislative threat may be the one that most Americans have never heard of. Economist Scott Powell and Acton friend Jay Richards explain in a new piece in Barron’s: While Obamacare received more attention, the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, also known as Dodd-Frank after its Senate and House sponsors, … unleashed a new regulatory body, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, to operate with unprecedented power. Dodd-Frank became law in...
Did 2,362 Millionaires Get Unemployment Checks in 2009? (Answer: Yes they did.)
The Congressional Research Service (CRS), a group that works exclusively for the U.S. Congress, issued a report with one of the greatest titles I’ve ever seen on a government document: Receipt of Unemployment Insurance by e Unemployed Workers (“Millionaires”) Now the first nine words are nothing special, typical policy-wonk speak. But whoever added in the word “millionaires” with scare quotes and parentheses is a genius. Most people would have been nodding off around the word “Insurance” but seeing millionaires (that’s...
On Call with Dr. Pamela Casson
Dr. Pamela Casson, a pediatrician in Colorado Springs, knows what it means literally to be “On Call.” This week she shares with us in this video interview with Jon Hirst how she sees God working through her in her work with families, children and the world around her. Thank you Pamela for giving us an inside look at how you see your work as blessing the world. ...
Want to Help the Poor? Promote a Free Market in Health Care
Want to help the poor? Promote a free market in health care. That’s the argument made by John C. Goodman, author of the new book Priceless: Curing the Healthcare Crisis. Timothy Dalrymple recently talked with Goodman about the best approach for restoring free-market pricing mechanisms into the market for medical care and health insurance: Aren’t there some people, however, who have little of money and lots of time, and would prefer to wait in order to receive cheaper care? There...
Rev. Sirico on Life, Work, and Human Flourishing
J.Q. Tomanek of Ignitum Today interviewed Rev. Sirico about life, work, human flourishing, and his new book, Defending the Free Market: JQ Tomanek: Back in the day, holiness was misinterpreted as a cleric or religious life thing. How can a lay Catholic practice their faith? What are some ways to sanctify our work as lay Catholics? Is “ora et labora” just a monk thing? Reverend Sirico: Yes, religious people are often tempted to e so “heavenly minded they are no...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved