Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
5 Reasons You’ll Love Acton University (Even If You Hate Conferences)
5 Reasons You’ll Love Acton University (Even If You Hate Conferences)
Jan 10, 2026 1:45 AM

I have confession to make: I don’t like conferences. I don’t like seminars or conventions, either. I also don’t like colloquiums, symposiums, forums, or summits. I love people (really, I do) and I love discussions about ideas. But something happens when you put them together into a “conference” that causes my introverted tendencies to spike. I’m just not a conference-going kinda guy.

That’s probably an odd admission to make, especially in a post in which I try to convince you e to Acton University. But it puts my praise for AU in perspective. Even though I don’t like most conferences I still have to go to several every year. All of the ones I attend are excellent, engaging, and fruitful—but they aren’t the sort of thing you’d go to if you aren’t a fan of conferences. AU is different. It’s the only conference-type event I can unreservedly mend to people who don’t like conferences. Here are four reasons why:

1. The foundational courses are excellent — The first time you attend AU you’re required to take four foundation courses (Biblical Foundations of Freedom, Christian Anthropology, Christian Vision of Government, and Economic Way of Thinking). Initially, I thought that was overly intrusive. Why try to tell me what I have to sign up for? But after taking the classes I realize how helpful it is to have everyone in attendance in possession of the same basic facts and understanding about what it means to build a free and virtuous society.

2. The classes are amazing — The problem with most conferences is that the most of the action takes place on the main stage. It’s like a sporting event—it’s often more enjoyable to watch it on video from fort of your own couch. The breakout sessions are usually filler and the quality varies considerably. At AU, the plenary sessions are the main course. The classes prised of small groups led by instructors who are experts on their topics. You don’t just get a rousing speech, you get real engagement with a topic you’re interested in. These courses alone are worth the price of admission.

3. The pacing is near perfect — Many people may find (as I did) that it’s not so much conferences that they don’t like, it’s the pacing. That is one of the single most important things AU does differently—and better—than almost any other event. Too often, conferences attempt to cram in too many sessions in too short a time. Conference planners for such events have the best intentions, of course. They want you to feel like you’re getting your money’s worth. But the result is that you’re usually rushing around and don’t get time to engage with the other people in attendance. You won’t get that feeling at AU. There is just enough time between sessions that you can engage in fellowship without feeling rushed and yet not so much downtime that you feel bored or antsy.

4. The spacing is near perfect too — Along with pacing, an important element of an event is the space. Many conferences have large crowdscrammed into small venues or spread out over a plex. The result is that you either feel claustrophobic or worn out from the extended hike to each session. AU is always at the DeVos Place Convention Center, a superb location that feels just right—not too big, not too small.

5. The people are fascinating — At most events I attend every year, the attendees look a lot like me (i.e., white, male, middle-age, Protestant). Of course, there’s nothing wrong with white, male, middle-age, Southern Baptists (I’m rather fond of them myself). But it does limit the type of connections I make and the reason for attending a conference. At most events I meet people I could have met online or at some other, similar conferences. At AU, the range of demographic groups represented is amazing, especially for such a relatively small conference (around 800 people). Sure, you’ll find a lot of the standard conference type folks (e.g. people who look like me). But you’ll also find a range of religious backgrounds and vocations (Orthodox priests, Catholic nuns, Presbyterianentrepreneurs, et al.), a mix of men and women, old and young, and people from all over the world. What’s most exciting, though, is that they are all people united around a Christian vision of human flourishing. You’ll meet people who are genuinely enthusiastic about learning about the classical foundations of freedom and how they apply to our culture today.

AU is still about 100 days away, so you have plenty of time to think about attending. Give it some thought and get some more information. AU isn’t for everybody. But you may be surprised—as I was—to find out it is for you.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Does the Vatican think water should be ‘free’?
Not surprisingly, the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace (PCJP)’s latest document on water has garnered scant media attention. Why, after all, would journalists, already notorious for their professional Attention Deficit Disorder and dislike of abstract disputation, report on something named “Water: An Essential Element of Life,” especially when it is nothing more than an update of a document originally released in 2003, and then updated in 2006 and 2009, with the exact same titles? Back then, First Things editor-in-chief...
Miller: Here I Come to Save the World Bank
In The American Spectator, Acton Institute’s Michael Matheson Miller throws his hat into the ring as he launches a tongue-in-cheek candidacy for World Bank president, but also raises serious questions about the institution’s poverty fighting programs. Miller is a research fellow at Acton, where he directs PovertyCure, an initiative that promotes enterprise solutions to poverty. Jeffrey Sachs — are you listening? Here are some planks from Miller’s campaign platform: I don’t believe that foreign aid is the solution — or...
HHS Mandate Fits Bigger Pattern
Both the original promise versions of the Obama administration’s health insurance mandate (the HHS mandate) coerce people into paying, either directly or indirectly, for other people’s contraception. The policy may have been pushed along by exigencies of Democratic Party constituency politics, but I suspect there’s also a worldview dimension to the mandate, one embodied in one of President Obama’s more controversial appointments—Science and Technology Policy Director John Holdren. Holdren, as far as I know, wasn’t involved in crafting President Obama’s...
John Locke and the Contraceptive Mandate
Michael Gerson on what the Obama administration’s view of religious liberty shares with John Locke: One tradition of religious liberty contends that freedom of conscience is protected and advanced by the autonomy of religious groups. In this view, government should honor an institutional pluralism — the ability of people to associate, live and act in accordance with their religious beliefs, limited only by the clear requirements of public order. So Roger Williams ed Catholics and Quakers to the Rhode Island...
Private Charity: A Practitioner’s View
There are only a few days left to register for the AU Online session, Private Charity: A Practitioner’s View! This online session will take place on March 27 and feature highly-rated Acton lecturer and current U.S. Regional Facilitator for Partners Worldwide, Rudy Carrasco. In a lecture that blends the theoretical with real-life encounters and stories, Rudy shows how using local knowledge and resources unavailable and unsuited to public agencies is vital for effective charity. Why wait to hear Rudy speak...
The Social Muddle
Over on The American Spectator website, Acton research fellow Jonathan Witt explains that contrary to the misunderstanding of many on the political and religious left,business, justice, and the Gospel are already social: The adjective that economist Friedrich Hayek famously called a “weasel word” is alive and well in the feel-good phrasessocial business,social justiceandthe social gospel. In all three of these phrases, mon weasel word sucks some of the essential meaning out of what it modifies by implying that business, justice,...
Obama Administration Actions Affecting Religious Freedom
“The past year has marked a shift in religious liberty debates,” notes Sarah Pulliam Bailey at Christianity Today, “one that previously centered on hiring rights but became focused on health care requirements.” Bailey put together a helpful timeline that shows a number of actions the government took in the past year, setting precedents and priorities on various issues affecting religious freedom. ...
Europe: A Turtle on its Back?
Would dissolving the mon currency, as proposed by the French free-market economist and entrepreneur Charles Gave in his bookLibéral mais non coupable(“Liberal But Not Guilty”) free the Old Continent to stand upright on its financial feet again?Or would dissolving the currency drastically end the European project altogether, as some pro-Euro technocrats in Brussels fear? Charles Gave, the chairman of the investment firmGaveKal, (and whose lecture I listened to at a 2011 Acton Conference Family Enterprise, Market Economies, and Poverty in...
Which Vocations Should Be Off Limits to Christians?
The Reformation doctrine of vocation teaches that even seemingly secular jobs and earthly relationships are spheres where God assigns Christians to live out their faith, notes Gene Veith. But are there some lines of work that Christians should avoid? God himself works through human vocations in providential care as he governs the world. He provides daily bread through farmers and bakers. He protects us through lawful magistrates. He heals us by means of physicians, nurses, and pharmacists. He creates new...
Can Fair Trade End Poverty?
Which does a better job helping the impoverished peoplearound the globe—free trade or fair trade? The American Enterprise Institute recently held a debate on that topic at John Brown Universityentitled “Free Trade vs. Fair Trade: What Helps the Poor?” Click here to watch the debate between scholars Claude Barfield, Paul Myers, and Victor Claar. In the debate Dr. Claar raises concerns about both the logic and economic reasoning underlying the fair trade movement. He also expands on that theme in...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved