Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
5 Reasons You’ll Love Acton University (Even If You Hate Conferences)
5 Reasons You’ll Love Acton University (Even If You Hate Conferences)
Jan 15, 2026 5:08 AM

I have confession to make: I don’t like conferences. I don’t like seminars or conventions, either. I also don’t like colloquiums, symposiums, forums, or summits. I love people (really, I do) and I love discussions about ideas. But something happens when you put them together into a “conference” that causes my introverted tendencies to spike. I’m just not a conference-going kinda guy.

That’s probably an odd admission to make, especially in a post in which I try to convince you e to Acton University. But it puts my praise for AU in perspective. Even though I don’t like most conferences I still have to go to several every year. All of the ones I attend are excellent, engaging, and fruitful—but they aren’t the sort of thing you’d go to if you aren’t a fan of conferences. AU is different. It’s the only conference-type event I can unreservedly mend to people who don’t like conferences. Here are four reasons why:

1. The foundational courses are excellent — The first time you attend AU you’re required to take four foundation courses (Biblical Foundations of Freedom, Christian Anthropology, Christian Vision of Government, and Economic Way of Thinking). Initially, I thought that was overly intrusive. Why try to tell me what I have to sign up for? But after taking the classes I realize how helpful it is to have everyone in attendance in possession of the same basic facts and understanding about what it means to build a free and virtuous society.

2. The classes are amazing — The problem with most conferences is that the most of the action takes place on the main stage. It’s like a sporting event—it’s often more enjoyable to watch it on video from fort of your own couch. The breakout sessions are usually filler and the quality varies considerably. At AU, the plenary sessions are the main course. The classes prised of small groups led by instructors who are experts on their topics. You don’t just get a rousing speech, you get real engagement with a topic you’re interested in. These courses alone are worth the price of admission.

3. The pacing is near perfect — Many people may find (as I did) that it’s not so much conferences that they don’t like, it’s the pacing. That is one of the single most important things AU does differently—and better—than almost any other event. Too often, conferences attempt to cram in too many sessions in too short a time. Conference planners for such events have the best intentions, of course. They want you to feel like you’re getting your money’s worth. But the result is that you’re usually rushing around and don’t get time to engage with the other people in attendance. You won’t get that feeling at AU. There is just enough time between sessions that you can engage in fellowship without feeling rushed and yet not so much downtime that you feel bored or antsy.

4. The spacing is near perfect too — Along with pacing, an important element of an event is the space. Many conferences have large crowdscrammed into small venues or spread out over a plex. The result is that you either feel claustrophobic or worn out from the extended hike to each session. AU is always at the DeVos Place Convention Center, a superb location that feels just right—not too big, not too small.

5. The people are fascinating — At most events I attend every year, the attendees look a lot like me (i.e., white, male, middle-age, Protestant). Of course, there’s nothing wrong with white, male, middle-age, Southern Baptists (I’m rather fond of them myself). But it does limit the type of connections I make and the reason for attending a conference. At most events I meet people I could have met online or at some other, similar conferences. At AU, the range of demographic groups represented is amazing, especially for such a relatively small conference (around 800 people). Sure, you’ll find a lot of the standard conference type folks (e.g. people who look like me). But you’ll also find a range of religious backgrounds and vocations (Orthodox priests, Catholic nuns, Presbyterianentrepreneurs, et al.), a mix of men and women, old and young, and people from all over the world. What’s most exciting, though, is that they are all people united around a Christian vision of human flourishing. You’ll meet people who are genuinely enthusiastic about learning about the classical foundations of freedom and how they apply to our culture today.

AU is still about 100 days away, so you have plenty of time to think about attending. Give it some thought and get some more information. AU isn’t for everybody. But you may be surprised—as I was—to find out it is for you.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Do We Need Pro-Family Tax Policies?
Last month, in “Europe’s Choice: Populate or Perish,” Acton Research Director Samuel Gregg observed: At a deeper level … Europe’s declining birth-rate may also reflect a change in intellectual horizons. A cultural outlook focused upon the present and disinterested in the future is more likely to view children as a burden rather than a gift to be cared for in quite un-self-interested ways. Individuals and societies that have lost a sense of connection to their past and have no particular...
Carbon Regulation: Ecological Utopia or Economic Nightmare?
In this week’s Acton Commentary, I discuss whether the Environmental Protection Agency’s planned regulation of carbon emissions can be justified from a Christian perspective. The EPA has found that carbon emissions endanger “public health and welfare,” and it is on track to begin regulating vehicle and power plant emissions. Environmentalists claim that policies targeting carbon emissions, such as EPA regulation or a cap-and-trade program, will stimulate the economy by creating green jobs. Unfortunately, this is not the case – the...
Publicly Funded Films: A Cautionary Tale
The most basic lesson of all of the various efforts, by both state and federal governments, to provide incentives for films to be made is that with government es government oversight. Once you go down the road of filing for tax credits or government subsidy in various forms, and you depend on them to get your project made, you open yourself up to a host of regulatory, bureaucratic, and censorship issues. It shouldn’t be a surprise, for instance, that states...
Audio: Rev. Sirico on ‘The Principle of Subsidiarity and the Service to the Poor’
On the new Reclaiming the Culture radio show, host Dolores Meehan recently interviewed Acton President Rev. Robert A. Sirico on the subject of “The Principle of Subsidiarity and the Service to the Poor.” Here’s how Meehan describes the show’s mission: Bay Area Catholics are some of the strongest Catholics in the country. Reclaiming the Culture grew out of the desire to show that the Catholic Church in the Bay Area has the resources to confront the prevailing secular culture. Our...
Acton on Tap – August 12: American Exceptionalism
Join us on Thursday, August 12, at Derby Station in Grand Rapids as we continue our Acton on Tap series, a casual and fun night out to discuss important and timely ideas with friends. The event is scheduled for 6:00 pm to 8:00 pm and discussion starts at 6:30. American Exceptionalism is a newsworthy topic as some on both the political left and right lament that America’s greatness is slipping away. But what does American Exceptionalism mean and how did...
The Ecumenical Movement and the Nuclear Question
It’s worth noting that the original context of engagement of the ecumenical movement by figures like Paul Ramsey and Ernest Lefever (two voices that figure prominently in my book, Ecumenical Babel) had much to do with foreign policy and the Cold War, and specifically the question of the proliferation of nuclear weapons. Last week marked the anniversary of the bombing of Hiroshima and today is the anniversary of the Nagasaki detonation. As ENI reports (full story after the break), the...
Abela: Will Teaching Business Ethics Make Business More Ethical?
On the National Catholic Register, Andrew Abela confesses to a “nagging suspicion that teaching business ethics in a university is not delivering on what is expected of it.” The question is both concrete and academic: Abela is the chairman of the Department of Business and Economics at The Catholic University of America and an associate professor of marketing. He was awarded the Acton Institute’s Novak Award in 2009. Here, he explains the problem with “amoral” business attitudes: … we often...
Re: Broken Windows – University Funding Edition
As Kishore Jayabalan noted yesterday, the fallacy of “broken windows” is, unfortunately, ubiquitous in discussions of public finance and macroeconomics. Though we are told that government spending and public works have a stimulating effect on economic activity, rarely are the costs of such projects discussed. Such is the case with several stimulus projects in my own hometown of Atlanta, GA. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reportson a list that Sen. John McCain and Sen. Tim Coburn drew up,criticizing wasteful stimulus projects throughout...
Family vs. the State in Indian and Chinese Entrepreneurship
This August 3 Wall Street Journal article is based on a Legatum Institute paring Indian and Chinese entrepreneurship and raises important issues about the roles of the state and the family in promoting entrepreneurship. mon elements between Indian and Chinese wealth-creators are their optimistic view of the pared to Americans (“Why I’m Not Hiring”) and Europeans (“Everything’s Fine With Greece, Just Ignore Some Facts”) presumably, and their lack of concern about the impact of the global financial crises on their...
The Economist, Catholicism, and Europe
When es to the sophistication of its coverage of religious affairs, the Economist is better than most other British publications (admittedly not a high standard) which generally insist on trying to read religion through an ideologically-secularist lens. Normally the Economist tries to present religion as a slightly plex matter than “stick-in-the-mud-conservatives”-versus-“open-minded-enlightened-progressivists”, though it usually slips in one of the usual secularist bromides, as if to reassure its audiences that it’s keeping a critical distance. A good example of this is...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved