Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
5 facts about the Russian Revolution
5 facts about the Russian Revolution
Dec 2, 2025 12:52 PM

This week is the hundredth anniversary of the second Russian Revolution, one of the most transformative political events in the history of the modern world. Here are five facts you should know about the world’s most destructive revolution:

1. The second Russian Revolution (the Bolshevik Revolution) began on November 6 and 7, 1917. (Because the Russians were still using the Julian calendar, the date for them was October 24 and 25, which is why the event is often referred to as the October Revolution.) It was the second of two revolutions in Russia in 1917. The first, which occurred in February, overthrew the 300-year rule of the imperial Romanov dynasty, while the second placed the Bolsheviks and their leader, Vladimir Lenin in power.

2. After the fall of the czarist government in February, the Russian parliament appointed the Provisional posed of leaders from the middle class capitalist class. In response, Lenin called for a government that would be ruled directly by “soviets.” The Soviet was a local council of delegates that represented soldiers, peasants, and workers and which performed both legislative and executive functions. In March the Petrograd Soviet of Workers’ and Soldiers’ Deputies, the soviet in the city formerly known as St. Petersburg, had gained so much power that it was able to issue its famous Order No. 1, which directed the military to obey only the orders of the Soviet and ignore those of the Provisional Government.

3. The Bolsheviks (a name which means “one of the majority”) were originally a faction of the Marxist Russian Social Democratic Labor Party. Founded by Vladimir Lenin and Alexander Bogdanov in 1903, this group—also known as “Reds”—had gained majorities in the powerful Petrograd and Moscow Soviets by 1917. They refused to share power with other parties and over the next few years became the dominant force in Russian politics. They changed their name to the Russian Communist Party (of Bolsheviks) in March 1918; to the All-Union Communist Party (of Bolsheviks) in December 1925; and to the Communist Party of the Soviet Union in October 1952.

4. In the first week of November the Bolsheviks and the Left Socialist pletely took over the government in a nearly bloodless coup. By occupying strategic locations, such as government buildings and telegraph stations, they were able to overthrow the Provisional Government within a few days. The Second All-Russian Congress of Soviets, which convened in Petrograd simultaneously with the coup, approved the formation of a new posed mainly of missars with Lenin as it’s leader. Lenin thus became the dictator of the world’s munist state.

5. The Russian Revolution sparked the world’s costliest civil war. The Russian Civil War lasted five years and is estimated to have claimed 1.5 batants and around 8 million civilians. Most of the civilians died because of armed attacks, disease, and famine. The warring factions included the Red Army, which fought for Lenin and the Bolsheviks, and the White Army, which consisted of diverse factions of monarchists, capitalists, and socialists. The conflict ended in 1923 with Lenin’s Red Army claiming victory and establishing the Soviet Union.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Government and Gambling
Over at Mere Comments I note the recent invective against gambling leveled by Al Mohler and Russell Moore. I contend that as opposed to casinos, lotteries are in fact the most troubling example of state-sponsored gambling. And I also worry a bit about the use of legal means to prohibit gambling, as it isn’t so clear to me that gambling is always and in every case a moral evil. Thus, I write, that cultural rather than primarily political attempts to...
Gleaner Tech #2: The Global Village Construction Set
[Note: This is the second in an occasional series ongleaner technology.] The Global Village Construction Setis a collection of 40 machines needed to “create a small civilization with forts…like a life-size Lego set.” ...
Libertarians, Religious Conservatives, and the Myth of Social Neutrality
When es to our view of individual liberty, one of the most unexplored areas of distinction between libertarians and religious conservatives* is how we view neutrality and bias. Because the differences are uncharted, I have no way of describing the variance without resorting to a grossly simplistic caricature—so with a grossly simplistic caricature we shall proceed: Libertarians believe that neutrality between the various spheres of society—and especially betweenthe government and the individual—are both possible and desirable, and so the need...
What does it mean to be On Call In Culture?
Most of us know what it feels like… this pull toward something. Whether it is art or science or writing or business—there is something inside you that says, “Yes, this is where I belong. This is what I was meant to do!” As Christians this realization e with a bit of disappointment mixed with the excitement of finding our place. We somehow wish that our calling were something of a more spiritual nature…something that mattered more. But here’s a question:...
Biased in Favor of the Entrepreneur State
Yesterday I argued that since bias is inherent in institutions and neutrality between individual and social spheres is illusory we should harness and direct the bias of institutions towards a free and virtuous society characterized by individual liberty and sustained by religious principles. One of the ways we can do that in the economic realm, I believe, is to encourage a bias toward entrepreneurship and away from corporatism. As Derek Thompson, a senior editor at The Atlantic, says, “It would...
Samuel Gregg: Inequality Anyone?
Over at National Review Online, Acton Research Director Samuel Gregg takes a look at a recent Charles Blow op-ed in the New York Times in which the writer hyperventilates about statements made by Rick Santorum on the subject of e inequality. Economically speaking, e inequality reflects the workings of several factors, many of which are essential if we want a dynamic, growing economy. Even your average neo-Keynesian economist will acknowledge that, without incentives (such as the prospect of a higher...
Since Christ Died for Us
Yesterday my son asked me why today is called “Ash Wednesday.” In that question I could hear the echoes of another question, “Since Christ has died for us, why do we still have to die?” The latter question is found in the Heidelberg Catechism, and the brief but poignant answer has stuck with me since I first encountered it. First, the catechism clarifies that our death does not have redemptive power: “Our death does not pay the debt of our...
Happiness is Subjective
One of the conclusions from last mentary was that the government shouldn’t be in the business of promoting a particular vision of the good life in America. That’s not to say that the government doesn’t have some role in promoting mon good or making some normative judgments about the good life. But it shouldn’t get anywhere near the level of specificity of promising a family, home, college education, and retirement for all. In part this is because while moral good...
No Olympic Dream: Monti’s wake up call to Italy
On Valentine’s Day, just one day before having to tender its application to the International Olympic Committee in Lausanne, Switzerland, Italy’s pragmatic Prime Minister Mario Monti showed no romantic spirit by canceling his nation’s dream to host the 2020 Summer Olympics. In a last-minute decision made Feb. 14, Prime Minister Monti explained at a press conference that the already overburdened Italian taxpayers simply cannot afford to finance the estimated $12.5 billion to bring the 2020 Olympic Games to Rome. “I...
Madison on Religious Conscience
The HHS Mandate is troubling to so many simply because it’s a clear Constitutional violation. Any basic understanding of Constitutional rights and our religious freedom sees that this is primarily about religious liberty, and not solely an issue concerning contraceptives or Roman Catholics. Last week we heard from James Madison on religious liberty in my post “Religious Liberty or Government Tolerance?” In 1792, Madison wrote an essay titled “Property” in the National Gazette. This is a brilliant piece by Madison...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved