Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
5 facts about the Russian Revolution
5 facts about the Russian Revolution
Dec 14, 2025 2:34 AM

This week is the hundredth anniversary of the second Russian Revolution, one of the most transformative political events in the history of the modern world. Here are five facts you should know about the world’s most destructive revolution:

1. The second Russian Revolution (the Bolshevik Revolution) began on November 6 and 7, 1917. (Because the Russians were still using the Julian calendar, the date for them was October 24 and 25, which is why the event is often referred to as the October Revolution.) It was the second of two revolutions in Russia in 1917. The first, which occurred in February, overthrew the 300-year rule of the imperial Romanov dynasty, while the second placed the Bolsheviks and their leader, Vladimir Lenin in power.

2. After the fall of the czarist government in February, the Russian parliament appointed the Provisional posed of leaders from the middle class capitalist class. In response, Lenin called for a government that would be ruled directly by “soviets.” The Soviet was a local council of delegates that represented soldiers, peasants, and workers and which performed both legislative and executive functions. In March the Petrograd Soviet of Workers’ and Soldiers’ Deputies, the soviet in the city formerly known as St. Petersburg, had gained so much power that it was able to issue its famous Order No. 1, which directed the military to obey only the orders of the Soviet and ignore those of the Provisional Government.

3. The Bolsheviks (a name which means “one of the majority”) were originally a faction of the Marxist Russian Social Democratic Labor Party. Founded by Vladimir Lenin and Alexander Bogdanov in 1903, this group—also known as “Reds”—had gained majorities in the powerful Petrograd and Moscow Soviets by 1917. They refused to share power with other parties and over the next few years became the dominant force in Russian politics. They changed their name to the Russian Communist Party (of Bolsheviks) in March 1918; to the All-Union Communist Party (of Bolsheviks) in December 1925; and to the Communist Party of the Soviet Union in October 1952.

4. In the first week of November the Bolsheviks and the Left Socialist pletely took over the government in a nearly bloodless coup. By occupying strategic locations, such as government buildings and telegraph stations, they were able to overthrow the Provisional Government within a few days. The Second All-Russian Congress of Soviets, which convened in Petrograd simultaneously with the coup, approved the formation of a new posed mainly of missars with Lenin as it’s leader. Lenin thus became the dictator of the world’s munist state.

5. The Russian Revolution sparked the world’s costliest civil war. The Russian Civil War lasted five years and is estimated to have claimed 1.5 batants and around 8 million civilians. Most of the civilians died because of armed attacks, disease, and famine. The warring factions included the Red Army, which fought for Lenin and the Bolsheviks, and the White Army, which consisted of diverse factions of monarchists, capitalists, and socialists. The conflict ended in 1923 with Lenin’s Red Army claiming victory and establishing the Soviet Union.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
DeVos’ Title IX regulations restore justice to campus
On May 6, Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos unveiled new Title IX regulations concerning sexual harassment and sexual assault on campus. Despite outraged cries of “turning back the clock” that echo across both sides of the Atlantic, the 2,033-page code reasserts the moral, ethical and legal norms that formed the basis of Western society. The prior definition of wrongdoing was so tantalizingly vague as to be infinitely elastic. “Sexual harassment is e conduct of a sexual nature,” said a 2011...
R.R. Reno, masks, and the vacuity of social media
First Things magazine is no stranger to controversy. In recent years, it has been increasingly critical­ of the market economy, made bizarre defenses of kidnapping in the guise of a book review, and e a clearing house of contrarian and moralistic perspectives on the COVID-19 pandemic. Earlier this week, First Things editor R.R. Reno took to Twitter to accuse those who try to avoid the spread of the coronavirus by wearing masks of cowardice. The tweets, since deleted, were widely...
What’s behind COVID-19 racial health disparities?
Soon after COVID-19 infection rates began to skyrocket in New York City and other densely populated urban areas, progressives and Democrats demanded data on the racial disparities of testing, treatments, and deaths. The data showed that blacks and Latinos were much more likely to die from the virus than whites and Asians. As expected, progressives moved to explain these disparities in terms of structural, systemic injustice in America’s health care system: Such injustice follows the country’s material and economic inequality....
Awe and wonder: The keys to curbing COVID-19 hubris
In our information age, armchair economists and epidemiologists are many. Society remains deeply divided—preoccupied with social media squabbles over the credibility of our leaders and the rightness or wrongness of their proposed solutions. Of course, the actual experts are divided, as well. Scientists and researchers are still arguing over the validity of various mathematical models. Inventors, businesses, munity institutions have adopted wide-ranging approaches to adapt to the virus. Governors and legislators remain split on how to interpret the bigger picture—weighing...
The making and unmaking of European democracy
If there is anything that we have learned over the past five years of political turmoil in Western countries, it is that large numbers of people across the political spectrum are increasingly dissatisfied with the workings of modern democracy. These trends reflect, as numerous surveys illustrate, deep distrust of established political parties and, more particularly, those individuals whose careers amount to a series of revolving doors between elected office, government service, the academy, and politically-connected businesses. What’s often missing from...
COVID-19 dynamism? New study explores innovation amid crisis
Amid the economic pain and disruption of COVID-19, much public attention has focused on the growing assortment of government interventions—from ever-increasing rules and regulations, to direct economic relief, to a mix of price controls and “stimulus” programs. Yet as governments continue their attempts at stabilizing the situation, we observe many solutions arising elsewhere. Across the economy and society, inventors, entrepreneurs, and workers are continuing to innovate and explore—reimagining their industries and businesses to address new constraints and meet human needs...
We must cure the global pandemic of loneliness
Millions of people within our country are experiencing extreme social isolation and loneliness. In a time defined by a pandemic and lockdowns, one would naturally expect people to feel this way, being cut off from family, friends, and neighbors. In actuality, the coronavirus has just exacerbated an existing pandemic that had been plaguing the United States for many years: a broad cultural trend of increased social isolation and alienation. Long before the coronavirus started, large segments of our society were...
Acton Line podcast: What is Christian humanism? A conversation with Bradley J. Birzer
Bradley J. Birzer, professor of history and the Russell Amos Kirk Chair in American Studies at Hillsdale College, joins this episode of Acton Line to speak about his newest book, “Beyond Tenebrae: Christian Humanism in the Twilight of the West.” What is Christian humanism and what role does it play in the Republic of Letters? What does it mean to live as a Christian humanist? Birzer helps lay down some of the foundational ideas in his book and explains the...
Rev. Sirico: How central planning created tunnel vision on COVID-19 response
Did central planning in health care and government make the COVID-19 pandemic worse by making the response more ineffective? Rev. Robert Sirico, president and co-founder of the Acton Institute, offers his thoughts on how centralization in health care and the economy has marginalized other perspectives and pushed aside notions of subsidiarity. ...
Rev. Robert Sirico: COVID-19 lockdown orders are the state-mandated ‘marginalization of religion’
Perhaps nowhere is the disconnect between private citizens’ views and those of the government clearer than when es to the role of religion in society. Acton Institute President and Co-founder Rev. Robert A. Sirico told a nationally syndicated radio program that state orders that effectively ban clergy from caring for sick patients represent “the marginalization of religion as a non-essential service,” and this “flies in the face of our entire history as an American republic.” “Who knows best what is...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved