Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
5 facts about the Berlin Wall
5 facts about the Berlin Wall
Apr 8, 2026 6:26 PM

This weekend, the world celebrates the 30th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall. On November 9, 1989, East Germans began picking at the wall with hammers, picks – even their bare hands – until the mammoth structure that had divided the city for the past 28 years lay in ruins.

Here are five facts you need to know about the Berlin Wall.

1. The Berlin Wall grew out of a settlement made at the end of World War II at Yalta and Potsdam. The Allies agreed to divide Germany into four regions occupied by the United States, the UK, France, and the USSR. Berlin, which lay entirely inside the Soviet region, had been similarly divided. Until 1961, people regularly passed from East Germany (known as the German Democratic Republic, or DDR) to West Germany (the Federal Republic of Germany, or DBR) – too regularly for the Communist authorities. Up to one-sixth of the population of East Germany, nearly 3.5 million people, fled into West Germany – reaching 1,000 a day by 1961. To stop the emigration of workers from the workers’ paradise, Nikita Khrushchev gave Socialist Unity Party General Secretary Walter Ulbricht permission to erect a barrier on the border.

2. Creation of the Berlin Wall began overnight on August 12-13, 1961. The original barrier consisted of coiled barbed wire and concrete blocks. The Berlin Wall ran 96 miles in length (27 miles within Berlin), and two walls rose between 11 and 15 feet high. Between them was a 160-foot “death strip.” The wall included 302 watchtowers, 20 bunkers, 55,000 land mines, 259 dog runs, and machine guns activated by tripwires. Initially, those with the proper documentation could cross through three checkpoints: “Checkpoint Alpha” in Helmstedt, “Checkpoint Bravo” in Dreilinden, and “Checkpoint Charlie” in Friedrichstrasse. East German officials called the wall the “Antifaschistischer Schutzwall,” telling citizens that the USSR erected the barrier to keep fascists out. But few were fooled by the Soviets’ motivation.

3. No fewer than 327 people died trying to cross the Berlin Wall into West Germany, 10 percent of whom were women. Another 5,000 people were captured trying to escape over (or sometimes, under) the wall.

4. The events that led to the fall of the Berlin Wall unfolded without a government order. During a routine press conference on November 9, 1989, government spokesman Günter Schabowski misread notes that indicated the government would allow East Germans to cross into West Berlin “immediately, without delay.” The Politburo intended the announcement to be released the next morning – and it only authorized people to apply for a travel visa. Guards, who now found themselves besieged by hundreds of thousands of East Germans eager to cross, received no orders on how to respond. Harald Jäger, who guarded the checkpoint at Bornholmer Strasse, ordered that the barrier be opened. Soon, people began streaming into West Berlin.

5. Communists and Soviet apologists attempted throughout the Cold War to equate the Berlin Wall with U.S. immigration policy. Ronald Reagan rebuffed these notions when he arrived in Berlin on June 11, 1982. “The Iron Curtain wasn’t woven to keep people out; it’s there to keep people in,” he said. “The most obvious symbol of this is the Berlin Wall.” Just six days later at the United Nations, he would call the wall “a grim, gray monument to repression.” And on June 12, 1987, he delivered his speech at the Brandenburg Gate demanding, “Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall.”

(Photo: Public domain.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Ecobits
Two quick bits for your Tuesday: – Federal judges on green junkets at your expense? CRC says so! – Is “steady state ecological economics” the answer to environmental and economic woes? [also, a quick thanks to Jordan for inviting me to join the PowerBlog team.] Federal judges on green junkets at your expense? But the three organizations CRC singles out have an agenda that goes beyond education and is the equivalent of lobbying, Kendall contends. FREE, for example, describes itself...
Anthony Bradley discusses Duke lacrosse on Fox
Anthony Bradley, a research fellow at the Acton Institute, was interviewed on “Heartland with John Kasich” on Fox News last Saturday. He was talking about the need for a “hero to emerge” from the Duke lacrosse team in the wake of a sexual assault scandal. Bradley emphasizes the need for moral leadership in the United States as a whole and why we should discourage markets from promoting the dehumanization of women. Bradley earned quite a bit of attention after writing...
Coercing charity
This section from Reinhold Niebuhr’s Moral Man and Immoral Society: A Study in Ethics and Politics strikes me as quite true: The coercive factors, in distinction to the more purely moral and rational factors, in political relations can never be sharply differentiated and defined. It is not possible to estimate exactly how much a party to a social conflict is influenced by a rational argument or by the threat of force. It is impossible, for instance, to know what proportion...
Spelling relief II
Jordan pretty well covered the territory in his earlier post on gas prices. But with the silliness from both Republicans and Democrats ongoing, it can’t hurt to suggest two additional sensible treatments of the subject: Thomas Nugent on National Review Online, and Jerry Taylor of the Cato Institute on Fox News. ...
Acton scholars on the immigration debate
Two Acton scholars, Andrew Yuengert and Fr. Paul Hartmann, were interviewed on “The World Over” (EWTN Studios) last Friday, April 28, about the Catholic response to immigration rights. Yuengert, author of the Acton monograph “Inhabiting the Land,” emphasizes the dignity of the human person as a foundation for looking at the issues surrounding immigration. Yuengert says that the “right to migrate” is not an absolute right, but to prevent people from assisting immigrants in need is immoral. e because they...
Economic turmoil in Zimbabwe
Where in the world would you pay $145,750 for a roll of toilet paper? According to an article in the New York Times, inflation in Zimbabwe is soaring higher than ever — about 900 percent since President Mugabe began seizing land from wealthy landowners in 2000. And inflation is climbing at unparalleled rates. What problems result from such rampant inflation? If inflation is climbing daily and you have $100 one day, it might be worth only $90 the next. People...
How do you spell relief?
You may have heard about the debate in Washington that erupted late last week, as Senate Democrats and Republicans sought ways to respond to rising gas prices. According to Marketplace’s Hillary Wikai, the majority Republicans settled on “a $100 gas-tax rebate to be paid for by drilling in Alaska’s Wildlife Refuge.” Michigan Democrat Debbie Stabenow proposed “a $500 rebate but pay for it by cutting the tax breaks for panies.” She said, “We should instead put that money back in...
St. Joseph the Worker
Today is the feast of St. Joseph the Worker: Work is a good thing for man-a good thing for his humanity-because through work man not only transforms nature, adapting it to his own needs, but he also achieves fulfilment as a human being and indeed, in a sense, es “more a human being”. For the rest of this encyclical, Laborem Exercens, click here. ...
Religion, economics, and the zoo
Ota Benga Sometimes the spirit of an age prevails with such force that it moves the highest pinnacles of cultural influence to support the grossest indignities. Consider the early 1900s. During this time, the prevailing zeitgeist of Darwinism gave rise to the tragic dehumanization of a Pygmy named Ota Benga. What follows are a few salient points from Cynthia Crossen’s story as published in The Wall Street Journal’s Déjà vu column “How Pygmy Ota Benga Ended Up in Bronx Zoo...
Faith-based funding politicizes religion
Rev. Robert A. Sirico looks at the Bush Faith-Based Initiative following the departure of Jim Towey, who headed the office. “I would far rather see a president rally people to give more to charity than rally voters to support government programs that go to religious organizations, and to create incentives and lessen penalties when they do give,” Rev. Sirico writes. Read Rev. mentary here. ...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved