Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
5 Facts about midterm elections
5 Facts about midterm elections
Jan 1, 2026 4:14 PM

Tomorrow is Election Day, when citizens of the United States go to the polls to elect a variety of public officials. This year is a midterm election (in contrast to both a Presidential election and “off-year” election years). Here are five facts you should know about midterm elections:

1. Midterm elections are the national elections in the U.S. that occur at the two-year midpoint of a president’s four-year term. Because members of the U.S. House of Representatives are elected for two-year terms and U.S. Senators for six-year terms, the all 435 House seats and one-third of Senate seats are decided at the midterm. Additionally, in 2018, the election will decide 36 state governorships and three U.S. territory governorships.

2. The party of the incumbent president tends to lose seats in Congress during midterm elections. Over the past century there have been 25 midterm elections. Of those, the incumbent president’s party has lost an average of 29 seats in the House and four seats in the Senate. The president’s party gained seats in both houses only two times: Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1934 and George W. Bush in 2002.

3. Warren Harding lost the most House seats (77 in 1922), and Franklin D. Roosevelt gained the most (9 in 1934). FDR also gained the most Senate seats (also 9 in 1934) while his former vice-president, Harry Truman, lost the most (10 in 1946). Only two presidents—Ronald Reagan in 1982 and Bill Clinton in 1998—neither gained nor lost seats in the Senate. (Every president has either gained or lost in the House.)

4. Since the 1840s, voter turn out for the midterm elections has dropped relative to the years for a presidential election. For example, according to Pew Research, 57.1 percent of the voting-age population cast ballots in 2008—the highest level in four decades. Two years later only 36.9 percent voted in the midterm election. But some researchers believe focusing on the voting-age population distorts the picture because so many people living in the country are ineligible to vote. For instance, roughly 20.5 million U.S. residents aged 18 and over (8.5 percent) of the voting-age population, were non-citizens, while another 3.2 million couldn’t vote because they were in prison or had been convicted of a felony. By subtracting those people, and adding in the 4.7 million American citizens living overseas but still eligible to vote, the population in 2012 that was eligible to vote was an estimated 222.3 million. Based on that adjusted base, turnout in recent elections was rather higher: 61.6 percent in 2008, 39.9 percent in 2010 and 58.2 percent in 2012.

5. In the early decades after the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, midterm elections typically drew more voters than presidential contests. At the time, most states only gave voting rights to property owners. Additionally, the federal government’s main power center was Congress rather than the presidency. As Pew notes, those conditions changed in the 1820s during theSecond Party System, when “most states repealed property qualifications, interest in politics soared as politicians increasingly appealed to ordinary people, and the parties directed much of their energy on capturing the White House after the disputed 1824 election (which John Quincy Adams won even though Andrew Jackson received the most votes).”

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Audio: Dr. Carl Trueman on Christians and Politics
If you weren’t able to make it to Derby Station on Wednesday for our latest Acton On Tap event, have no fear: we’re pleased to present the full recording of the evening’s festivities featuring Dr. Carl Trueman of Westminister Seminary via the audio player below. If you’re unfamiliar with Dr. Trueman or his work, check out Jordan Ballor’s introduction right here. Considering that the PowerBlog’s focus over the past few days has been on how Christians are approaching the debt...
Call of the Entrepreneur Website Redesigned
Now is a great time to check out Acton’s first documentary, The Call of the Entrepreneur. Call of the Entrepreneur's new design. The website has pletely redesigned to be more user friendly and attractive. You will find links to social media forCall of the Entrepreneur as well as options to share the documentary with your friends at the bottom of the site. We’ve also added the high definition trailer to the site. The only trailer available on the previous website...
Taking His Name in Vain: What Would Jesus Cut?
Ray’s post pointed to something that’s been bugging me about Jim Wallis’ “What Would Jesus Cut?” campaign. As with the “What Would Jesus Drive?” campaign (“Transportation is a moral issue.” What isn’t these days?), Wallis’ campaign assumes the moral high ground by appropriating the Holy Name of Jesus Christ to advance his highly politicized, partisan advocacy. Jesus es an advertising slogan. And what is implicit here is that those who oppose Wallis are somehow at odds with the Gospel of...
‘A Call for Intergenerational Justice’ and the Question of Economic Growth
While there is much to applaud in the Center for Public Justice and Evangelicals for Social Action’s “A Call for Intergenerational Justice,” the lack of discussion of the problem of economic growth is troubling. I believe Don Peck is correct when he writes in The Atlantic: If it persists much longer, this era of high joblessness will likely change the life course and character of a generation of young adults—and quite possibly those of the children behind them as well....
Unintended Consequences and Wind Turbines
With the surge in oil prices, there’s renewed interest in alternative energy options. Numerous countries have gradually taken steps to promoting renewable or clean energy technologies, and it seems the United States is drifting more towards favoring alternative energy options as the Obama Administration is looking at banning off shore drilling along the continental shelf until 2012 and beyond. However, before we move farther down this road, a critical analysis of the pros and cons is a must. A more...
Archbishop Chaput: The American experience and global religious liberty
A brilliant assessment of where we are. (HT: American Orthodox Institute Observer). Subject to the governor of the universe: The American experience and global religious liberty March 1, 2011 – Most Rev. Charles J. Chaput, O.F.M. Cap., Archbishop of Denver, addressed the Berkley Center for Religion, Peace and World Affairs at Georgetown University. A friend once said – I think shrewdly — that if people want to understand the United States, they need to read two documents. Neither one is...
Jesus as Budget Director?
My first reaction to “What Would Jesus Cut?” is that it tends to reduce Christ to a distributor of material goods through government programs. Jesus is not a budget overseer or a dispenser of government largesse. Sojourners founder Jim Wallis has already countered this accusation with his own post saying, “We haven’t been trying to get Jesus to be the head of any mittee, or think that he would ever want that job!” But still, to use Christ as an...
Opposing Views: America’s Debt Crisis and ‘A Call for Intergenerational Justice’
Last week’s issuance of “A Call for Intergenerational Justice: A Christian Proposal on the American Debt Crisis” has occasioned a good bit of discussion on the topic, both here at the PowerBlog and around various other blogs and social media sites. It has been interesting to see the reaction that ments about the Call have generated. Many have said that I simply misunderstood or misread the document. I have taken the time to reread the document and do some reassessment...
Abortion and Intergenerational Justice
I’m not sure I have ever really encountered the term intergenerational justice before this discussion over “A Call for Intergenerational Justice,” at least in any substantive way. This unfamiliarity is what lay behind my initial caveat regarding the term, my concern that it not be understood as “code for something else.” The Call itself provides a decent definition of the concept, or at least of its implications: “…that one generation must not benefit or suffer unfairly at the cost of...
A Response to ‘What Would Jesus Cut?’
Jim Wallis and a number of other Christians involved in politics are trying to gain attention for the question, “What would Jesus cut?” The answer to this question is supposed to be as obvious as it is in other moral contexts. For example, would Jesus lie about the useful life of a refrigerator he was selling for Best Buy? No way. Would he bully a kid into giving away his lunch money? Not a chance. Would you find him taking...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved