Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
5 Facts about food stamp programs
5 Facts about food stamp programs
Jan 14, 2026 2:52 AM

Last week the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) proposed a measure it claims will close a loophole that allows states to make participants receiving minimal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) benefits automatically eligible to participate in USDA’s Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Acting Deputy Under Secretary Brandon Lipps said the proposed rule would result in saving an average of $2.5 billion per year.

Here are five facts you should know about food stamp programs like SNAP.

1. The first federal Food Stamp Program (FSP) began in 1930 and ended in 1943. The program allowed people on relief to buy orange stamps equal to their normal food expenditures. For every $1 worth of orange stamps purchased, 50 cents worth of blue stamps were received. Orange stamps could be used to buy any food while Blue stamps could only be used to buy food determined by the USDA to be surplus. Another pilot program ran from 1961 until 1964, when Congress passed the Food Stamp Act. The program grew from half a million participants in 1965 to a record high of 22.4 million people in 1981. (A new record high of 47.6 million people was reached in 2013.)

2. The FPS underwent numerous revisions throughout the 1970s and 1980s. One significant change was the Electronic Benefits Transfer (EBT), a program first introduced in 1984, which provided benefits on a debit card rather than on paper stamps. EBT helped to reduce food stamp fraud by creating an electronic record of each food stamp transaction, making it easier to identify violations. The rate of food stamp fraud—primarily the exchange of food stamps for cash—dropped from nearly 4 percent in the 1990’s down to around 1 percent after EBT was fully implemented.

3. In efforts to counter the stigma attached to the term “food stamps,” Congress changed the name of the program in 2008 to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or SNAP, and changed the name of the Food Stamp Act of 1977 to the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008. States were given flexibility to name the program on their own (at the time, 10 states already changed the names of their programs) but were encouraged to change the name to SNAP or another alternate name.

4. SNAP is the largest federal nutrition assistance program, in both participation and spending. Such programs are funded under the “Nutrition” section of the omnibus legislation passed every five years known as the farm bill (the latest bill was the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018). According to the Congressional Budget Office’s (CBO’s) projected costs at the time of the 2018 law’s enactment, the Nutrition title makes up approximately 76 percent of farm bill spending, and SNAP is the vast majority of the Nutrition spending. Approximately 95 percent of SNAP spending is for the benefits themselves, which are 100 percent federally funded., while administrative costs of eligibility determination are shared between the states and the federal government. As of 2018, the program cost $64.9 million for 40.3 million participants.

5. SNAP is designed primarily to increase the food purchasing power of eligible e households to help them buy a nutritionally adequate low-cost diet as determined by USDA guidelines. SNAP benefits are available for households that meet federal financial eligibility tests for limited monthly e (at or below 130% of the federal poverty level) and liquid assets ($2,000 per household). These rules, however, can be bypassed through the use of “categorical eligibility” for SNAP. Categorical eligibility provides states with the ability to modify federal financial eligibility rules. As of February 2018, 42 states utilized broad-based categorical eligibility, although several do so with an added limit on liquid assets. To be eligible for SNAP, a household must also fulfill requirements related to work effort and must meet citizenship and legal permanent residence tests.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Why Our Struggling Economy Needs More Entrepreneurship
Harvard economics professor Edward Glaeser explains why entrepreneurs are important for our struggling economy: In every year since 1989, panies have created more net jobs than the economy as a whole, which means that panies are, on average, destroying more jobs than they create. In 2009, the latest year for which we have data, new businesses created 2.33 million jobs, while older businesses destroyed, on net, more than 7 million jobs. The share of Americans working in startups has fallen...
Audio: Gregg on Obamacare at the Supreme Court
This week has seen some pretty substantial Constitutional drama unfold in the chambers of the United States Supreme Court as the constitutionality of President Obama’s signature legislative plishment is put to the test. Relevant Radio host Drew Mariani called upon Acton’s Director of Research, Dr. Samuel Gregg, to give his thoughts on the course of the arguments so far and his thoughts on how Catholic social teaching applies to the issue of health care in general. The interview lasts about...
Samuel Gregg: The Left Resumes Its War on History
On The American Spectator, Acton Research Director Samuel Gregg examines how the left wages “a war of rejection and rationalization against whatever contradicts their mythologies.” Which explains why leftists get into a snit when you point out factual details like how Communist regimes “imprisoned, tortured, starved, experimented upon, enslaved, and exterminated millions” throughout the 20th century. And it makes it so much harder to wear that Che Guevara t-shirt without being mocked in public. Gregg: Overall, the left has been...
How “Free-Market Roads” Can Restrict Freedom
In a political climate dominated by debates about individual mandates and restrictions on religious freedoms, an issue like road privatization isn’t likely to be on the top of anyone’s list of major concerns. But theexcellent post on “The Mirage of Free-Market Roads” byTimothy B. Lee, a writer with Ars Technica and the Cato Institute, is worth reading even if you don’t care about toll roads. Leeprovides an intriguing example of why we need to think clearly about how we apply...
Video: Business as Mission 2.0
If you weren’t able to attend last week’s Acton Lecture Series event here at Acton’s Grand Rapids office, we’ve got you covered. we’re pleased to present video of Rudy Carrasco’s lecture, entitled “Business as Mission 2.0,” below. ...
The Reformed Journal and the Grand Rapids Intellectuals
The fine folks at Cardus, the noteworthy thinktank north of the border, have posted a review of The Best of the Reformed Journal. John Schmalzbauer, who teaches in the Department of Religious Studies at Missouri State University where he holds the Blanche Gorman Strong Chair in Protestant Studies, concludes about the situation sixty years after the founding of the Reformed Journal: Though the surnames remain the same, American politics has changed. Defending Franklin Roosevelt, Lester DeKoster once wrote that “laissez...
Morlino: Religious Freedom Defended with Charity and Reason
Yesterday in his personal column for the Diocese of Madison’s Catholic Herald, Bishop Robert C. Morlino issued a call to arms to Catholics battling for their religious freedom. But such a battle, he says, is one that should emulate Christ’s loving nature, while being resolutely clear and firm in rejecting the obligation of Catholic institutions to provide healthcare that includes contraceptives and abortifacients under the Obama administration’s controversial HHS mandate(see recent reactions below on EWTN by U.S. bishops and Acton’s...
Marital Status and the Social Safety Net
“Unless incentives suddenly stopped mattering during this recession, saysCasey B. Mulligan, an economics professor at the University of Chicago, “it appears that the expanding social safety net explains some of the excess nonemployment among unmarried women who are heads of households.” An unintended but unavoidable consequence of providing someone a cushion when they are without work is that they are provided with less incentive to get back to work. By definition, married women have husbands and unmarried women do not,...
Obamacare Lets the Government Decide What’s Moral
“The state’s appetite to find solutions from the center lures it to create positive rights out of thin air,” says Ismael Hernandez, president and founder of the Freedom and Virtue Institute, “even at the expense of a narrower space for civil society.” prehensive nature of religious thought often tempts religious bodies mand society from the center. Their tendency is to suffuse the system with a holistic vision of reality because such vision is seen as true and good. A social...
Reply to George McGraw and Catholic World News on ‘The Right to Water’
Thanks to George McGraw, Executive Director of DigDeep Right to Water Project, for his kind and thoughtful Counterpoint to my original post. He and his organization are clearly dedicated to the noble cause of providing clean water and sanitation to all, a cause which everyone can and should support. It is also a very sensible objective that would aid the world’s poor much more than trendier causes such as “climate change” and “population control” which tend to view the human...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved