Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
3 Reasons income tax cuts (almost) always benefit the wealthy
3 Reasons income tax cuts (almost) always benefit the wealthy
Apr 26, 2025 12:58 AM

Death and taxes may be the only certainties in life, but there is a close third: e tax cuts mostly benefit e workers.

As Congress discusses tax reform, the debate about who will benefit from tax cuts is back in the news. And many people are concerned with how the changes will favor high e earners. Even President Trump has promised that the reforms won’t give wealthy Americans a massive tax cut.

The reality is that there is almost no way to cut e taxes without most of the benefits going to e workers. Here are three reasons why:

1. Americans with high es pay most of the taxes

The intended goal of reducing taxes on Americans can have a significant affect on whose taxes are being cut. For example, let’s say the goal is to cut e taxes to return a specific amount of money back to citizens—$500 billion—in the hopes of stimulating consumer spending.

If that is our goal, then we can’t cut the e taxes paid by the bottom 45 percent of American earners. Why? Because they already don’t pay any e taxes.

As Politico notes, the top 0.1 percent of earners are projected to pay more to the IRS than the bottom 80 bined. And for 2017, official government data shows the top 20 percent will pay 95 percent of all e taxes. The rich benefit from e tax cutsbecause they pay most of the e taxes.

2. Americans with lower es already have low tax rates

But what if instead of focusing on a dollar amount, we just cut e tax rates? Couldn’t we just cut the rates on the lower rungs of the e ladder? Not really, because they are already low.

The average federal tax rate for people whose earnings put them in the 21st to 80th percentile of es has fallen by 30 percent since 1979 to 13.8 percent. Rates on e people have declined even further, by 57 percent, to 3.3 percent. If we cut the lowest rate by 1 percent it might save a worker $100 a year.

“The fact that they don’t pay very much in taxes means that it’s very hard to provide them with a large tax cut,” says Adam Looney, a former deputy assistant Treasury secretary for tax analysis in the Obama administration.

3. Marginal tax cuts benefit everyone

e taxes are based on marginal rates, the amount of tax paid on an additional dollar of e. Here’s an example of a marginal tax rate bracket.

10% for e $0 to $9,275

15% for e $9,275 to $37,650

25% for e $37,650 to $91,150

28% for e $91,150 to $190,150

33% for e $190,150 to $413,350

35% for e $413,350 to $415,050

39.6% for e $415,050+

Let’s say we want to lower the taxes for everyone making $90,000 or less, so we reduce the 25 percent bracket to 20 percent, the 15 to 10 percent and the 10 to 7. (For the sake of simplicity, we’ll assume there are no deductions, including no standard deduction.)

The effect would be that someone making $9,000 a year would pay $270 less in taxes, someone making $35,000 would pay $1,750 less, and someone earning $50,000 a year would pay $2,500 less.

But the person making $100,000 would also save about $20,390 because of the lower marginal rates. The worker making $9,000 saw her taxes reduced by 3 percent but the person making $100,000 had a more than 20 percent reduction.

“It’s basically impossible to have a large tax cut that doesn’t involve most of the benefits going to e groups just because that’s who pays taxes now,” says Looney.

The real questions Americans—especially American Christians—should be asking is, “Why does it matter?” Why are we so worried that the wealthy may be getting some sort of advantage that is out of proportion to what we may be getting? Perhaps we should be less concerned on sinful class envy and more focused on developing prudent tax policies that benefit everyone and lead to greater economic flourishing.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Lord Acton and the Power of the Historian
Looking through my back stacks of periodicals the other day I ran across a review in Books & Culture by David Bebbington, “Macaulay in the Dock,” of a recent biography of Thomas Babington Macaulay. The essay takes its point of departure in Lord Acton’s characterization of Macaulay as “one of the greatest of all writers and masters, although I think him utterly base, contemptible and odious.” As Bebbington writes, “Acton, a towering intellectual of the later 19th century, was at...
Reagan, Whittaker Chambers, and the Threat to Freedom
Over at the Liberty Law Blog, there is an excellent post titled “Ronald Reagan, Whittaker Chambers, and the Dialogue of Liberty” by Alan Snyder. Snyder delves into the influence Chambers had on Reagan and how their worldviews differed as well. Many conservatives and scholars felt Chambers’ prediction that the West was on the losing side of history in the battle against Marxism collapsed after the fall of the Iron Curtain and the Soviet Union. For many, the ideas of Chambers...
Obamacare’s Religious Rubes
The White House has a plan to mobilize prayer vigils in front of the Supreme Court in defense of Obamacare. It was reported that the administration met with leaders at non-profit organizations and religious officials who support the new health care law. The court takes up the constitutional test of the health care mandate in a couple of weeks. The mandate has now been challenged in 26 states. Cue the same stale big government religious prophets who confuse statism and...
Integral Human Development
The Journal of Markets & Morality is planning a theme issue for the Spring of 2013: “Integral Human Development,” i.e. the synthesis of human freedom and responsibility necessary for the material and spiritual enrichment of human life. According to Pope Benedict XVI, Integral human development presupposes the responsible freedom of the individual and of peoples: no structure can guarantee this development over and above human responsibility. (Caritas in Veritate 17) There is a delicate balance between the material and the...
Constitutional Cases and the Four Cardinal Virtues
Should virtue be a consideration in judicial decisionmaking? Indiana Law Professor R. George Wright makes an intriguing argument for why the four cardinal virtues could be useful in interpreting constitutional cases: Judges typically decide constitutional cases by referring to one or more legal precedents, rules, tests, principles, doctrines, or policies. This Article mends supplementing this standard approach with fully legitimate and appropriate attention to what many cultures have long recognized as the four basic cardinal virtues of practical wisdom or...
How to Steal a Bike in New York City
Edmund Burke didn’t really say it, but it still rings true: All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. In a test of this maxim, filmmaker Casey Neistat tries to steal his own bike in several locations around New York City and finds that most people do nothing about it—even when it’s done right in front of a police station. I recently spent a couple of days conducting a bike theft experiment, which...
How to Love Liberty More Than a Libertarian Economist
I have a deep and abiding love for liberty—which is why I find myself so often in disagreement with libertarians. Libertarians love liberty too, of course, but they tend to love liberty a bit differently. I love liberty in an earthy, elemental way. I love liberty because I need it—like I need air and food—for human flourishing. In contrast, the libertarians I’ve encountered tend to love liberty primarily as an abstraction. Indeed, the most ideologically consistent libertarians I know seem...
Let’s Change Hearts and Minds (and Laws, Too)
Few clichés are so widespread within the evangelical subculture, says Matthew Lee Anderson, as the notion that our witness must be one of “changing hearts and minds.” In careful hands, the idea is at best ambiguous. At worst it reinforces the sort of interior-oriented individualism that allows for and perpetuates a blissful naivete about how institutions and structures shape our dispositions and thoughts. In less than careful hands, the phrase drives a wedge between law and culture by attempting to...
Is Work a Curse?
Is work a curse, a result of mankind’s fall from grace? Not according to the Book of Genesis. As Hugh Whelchel, Executive Director of the Institute for Faith, Work & Economics, explains, what Adam was called to do in the garden is what we are still called to do in our work today: Humanity was created by God to cultivate and keep God’s creation, which included developing it and protecting it. You see, we were created to be stewards of...
Italy’s Tax Man Takes Aim at the Vatican
Kishore Jayabalan, the Acton Institute’s Rome office director, was interviewed by the Zenit news agency in an article titled, “Is Taxing the Church a Real Solution for Italy?” In the article, Jayabalan discusses the history of the Italian state and its imposition of property taxes on the Roman Catholic Church’s land holdings, residences and non-profit businesses. Sometimes in the past, particularly under Napoleonic rule and before the Lateran Pacts, the institution of property tax was often a subject of state...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved