Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
3 problems with effective altruism
3 problems with effective altruism
Mar 18, 2025 2:16 PM

In an extremely disturbing video, a two year old girl is run over by a truck in a China. Shortly after being run over, three strangers walk past the girl and do nothing. Eventually, a street cleaner picks her up and transports her to the hospital where she later dies. Utilitarian philosopher, Peter Singer, uses this real world example in a TEDTalk that has now received over 1 million views to make a point about our global charity and aid efforts.

Singer claims that those of us in the West are just as guilty as the three men that refuse to help the dying child in the video. That’s because we fail to adequately help those dying daily from preventable diseases in the developing world — such as malaria.

The philosophy that springs from Singer’s reasoning is called effective altruism. This, says William McCaskill of the Centre for Effective Altruism, “is the project of using evidence and reason to figure out how to benefit others as much as possible, and taking action on that basis.” Essentially, to be moral agents, we must only use evidence and reason to ensure we are giving to charities that have the greatest return on saving lives and increasing overall wellbeing.

In 2007, effective altruists Holden Karnofsky and Elie Hassenfeld, founded GiveWell.org in order “to determine how much good a given program plishes (in terms of lives saved, lives improved, etc.) per dollar spent.” Today, they have curated a list of nine charities that they believe do the “most good per dollar spent.”

The effective altruist would have us believe that unless we are “giving back” to a highly effective charity, as determined by the GiveWell.org utilitarian well-being calculus, we mitting the moral equivalent of walking past the nearly dead child in the street.

I find this line of reasoning to be not just troubling, but wrong. Why?

First, effective altruism requires me to make a cold, impersonal hyper-utilitarian calculation in all of my decisions. It forces me to weigh temporarily helping my younger sister who has just suffered a major tragedy versus saving a person in the developing world from malaria. The effective altruist would say that it is immoral to help my sister, who is relatively well-off, at the cost of giving additional dollars to one of the charities on the GiveWell.org list. The effective altruist is forced to neglect his or her duty to their family or neighbors.

Second, there is a knowledge problem that exists when helping those in need — which is exacerbated when trying to help on a global scale. Yes, GiveWell.org has done a meticulous job of evaluating the effectiveness of nine charities, but there are still many unknown variables which don’t fit into their one-size-fits-all algorithm. While one can know exactly the help that is needed in the case of the little girl laying in the street in China, it is hard to determine the appropriate help in faraway places. We must take into consideration if people in developing countries have access to other means of help, which form of assistance will help them achieve true flourishing, and whether the help we give will be beneficial in the long-term.

Third, Singer praises wealthy business people, like Bill Gates, who have pledged to give away most of what they make to causes deemed “good” by organizations like GiveWell.org. While Singer heaps high praise on business people who pledge to give away their financial resources, he fails to recognize the role that business itself has played in lifting millions around the globe out of poverty. Business can be a good in itself, not simply because it allows us to be more charitable.

Finally, the effective altruism approach fails to recognize the core reason why many people in the developing world live in poverty in the first place. That is, they lack basic economic freedom and institutions of justice, such as sound property rights and equal access to the rule of law. The Fraser Economic Freedom Index shows that nations with a high amount of economic freedom outperform those with low economic freedom in indicators of well-being. It’s strange that the effective altruists, who seek to achieve the maximum amount of human well-being, don’t focus on this more.

The Singerian, or effective altruism, approach to charity views people as problems or equations to be solved through a type of utilitarian calculus rather than as unique, unrepeatable persons created in the image of God with free will, creative capacity, a social nature, and an eternal destiny.

When we view human persons as being unique and unrepeatable, it transforms our charitable efforts in a way that requires us e into relation with those in need, rather than simply throwing money or goods at people and expecting long-term human flourishing in return.

Instead of adopting the patronizing and dehumanizing utilitarian cry of the effective altruists, we must take a nuanced approach to our charitable efforts that views people as subjects, protagonists in their own story, rather than as objects of our charity, pity, passion. There is no silver bullet solution to poverty alleviation. Our charitable efforts must be as unique and diverse as the human person.

Home page photo: Peter Singer at Crawford Australian Leadership Forum, June 2017. Wiki Commons

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
ResearchLinks – 08.03.2012
Articles: “Invited Articles: Business as Mission” Journal of Biblical Integration in Business 15, no. 1 (Spring 2012) The most recent issue of JBIB focuses on the subject of hybrid business and features a controversy on the subject of Business as Mission. Margret Edgell, the issue’s guest editor, describes it as follows: “Three invited authors respond to each other from their different disciplinary and theological perspectives. They raise and debate the question: Is Business as Mission a new field with great...
The Faith of a Young Entrepreneur
In 2010 Alexandra Abraham slipped on a wet floor and into a business idea. According to Forbes magazine, U.S. restaurants face an estimated $2 billion in “slip and fall” lawsuits each year. So Abraham, a 23-year-old college student, designed and started manufacturing DripCatch, a plastic tray that snaps tightly on the racks that go inside industrial dishwashers to catch the water from getting on the floor. Abraham tells Resurgence how the experience has grown her faith and shown her how...
‘An Economic Roadmap to Nowhere’
Ismael Hernandez responds to President Obama’s “You didn’t get there on your own” speech with a piece titled “Obama’s Assault on Entrepreneurship: An Economic Roadmap to Nowhere,” on Crisis Magazine’s website. Hernandez, founder of the Freedom & Virtue Institute and regular Acton lecturer, employs Catholic moral teaching to determine just how much credit the government deserves for an entrepreneur’s successes. The President’s statements, Hernandez reasons, fail to account for the freedom of the individual to make sound economic and moral...
The Tortured Logic of the Obamacare Law
The Affordable Care Act, monly known as “Obamacare”, is a strange law from the perspective of economic theories of insurance markets. Still, one can see where its designers were starting from. The individual mandate may be onerous from a liberty standpoint, but it makes sense if you understand that insurance markets are vulnerable to a phenomenon known as the “death spiral.” The idea behind the death spiral is based on the recognition that insurance is a risk management scheme. panies,...
When Should Christians Refuse to Pay Taxes?
As the federal government es ever more willing to use taxpayer dollars to fund activites that violate the conscience of its citizens, we’re increasingly faced with the question of whether we should refuse to pay those taxes. Theologian R.C. Sproul Jr. says the Christian answer is clear: . . . I can say with confidence that Christians should in fact pay whatever taxes they owe even when that money ends up financing abortions. The Christian who pays such taxes has...
Radio Free Acton with Amity Shlaes
In continuing with the work of highlighting Calvin Coolidge at Acton, Marc Vander Maas and I recently spoke with Amity Shlaes. Shlaes’s biography of the 30th president will be out in early 2013. She is a big fan of the Acton Institute and praised our work saying, “Acton has been all over the Coolidge case.” Shlaes is also interviewed in the Fall 2009 issue of Religion & Liberty. Listen to the podcast below: [audio: Marc and I also recorded an...
Rev. Robert Sirico Interview in ‘The Washington Times’
Brett M. Decker, editorial page editor of The Washington Times, recently interviewed Rev. Robert Sirico, president and co-founder of The Acton Institute, in response to Rev. Sirico’s latest book, Defending the Free Market: The Moral Case for a Free Economy. In his answers, Rev. Sirico addresses the market’s moral potential as well as the present state of the nation. Excerpt: Decker: Your new book is about the moral case for a free economy. What is the morality of the marketplace...
Teacher’s Union: We Want to Help You By Suing You
For decades teachers’s unions have been giving teachers—and unions—a bad name. A prime example is the intimidation tactics used by Louisiana Association of Educators (LAE): A Louisiana teachers union is threatening private schools with legal action if they accept money from a new voucher program – and the threat has already forced at least one school to put its participation in the program on hold. The demand was sent a few weeks ago by law firm representing the Louisiana Association...
On Call in Culture and Storytelling
Last week we talked about how our memory is important to God using us where we are. Now we talk about another skill that is important to cultivate while being On Call in Culture: Storytelling. Only when we can express what God is doing through us can we truly understand our own experiences. The first step in storytelling is observation and reflection. After observing our spheres and reflecting on what happens we can begin to share with others what we...
QE: Haven’t We Learned So Much Since 1609?
In response to my post last Thursday on the Fed’s signaling the possibility of more quantitative easing (QE), mentator using the pseudonym “Milton Friedman” wrote, have you checked inflation rates lately? they are at historic lows. if the parade of horribles doesn’t happen, shouldn’t that cause you to reconsider your understanding of the economy? economists have learned quite a few things since 1609… As I responded on that post, I’m not sure what “parade of horribles” he is referring to;...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved