Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
What you need to know about the UK snap election on June 8
What you need to know about the UK snap election on June 8
Apr 29, 2025 8:19 AM

On Tuesdaymorning, UK Prime Minister Theresa May announced that she is proposing a snap election for Parliament on June 8. The House of Commons is likely to authorize the vote on Wednesday, leaving just 49 days until the third national election in three years. Here’s what you need to know.

Why is Theresa May calling for this vote now?

May says political opposition from the Labour Party, Scottish nationalists, and “unelected members of the House of Lords” is undermining her ability to negotiate favorable terms for the UK’s departure from the European Union. Speaking outside 10 Downing Street on Tuesday morning, the prime minister said their “political game-playing … jeopardises the work we must do to prepare for Brexit at home and it weakens the government’s negotiating position in Europe.”

Postponing the election, May said, means that campaigning will not ramp up as she is concluding Brexit terms and setting the conditions of the UK’s future access to the EU’s single market.

Why does the House of Commons have to authorize the election?

The Fixed-Term Parliaments Act of 2011 states that national elections will be held only once every five years. The last national election was held in 2015, and the next one was scheduled for 2020. However, two-thirds of the House of Commons’ 650 members can vote to allow a snap election. May said she will ask for that vote on Wednesday. Opposition party leaders support the call.

What issues will be the most important in the campaign?

May will campaign on Brexit, Brexit, Brexit – saying that her opponents are endangering the fragile state of talks with Brussels. Polls show an increasing number of Remain voters wish politicians would “get on” with the business of extricating the UK from the EU in the most advantageous way. “The country ing together, but Westminster is not,” May said. “Division in Westminster will risk our ability to make a success of Brexit, and it will cause damaging uncertainty and instability to the country.” Remain voters, meanwhile, see this as the closest opportunity they will have to hold a second national referendum on EU membership.

May’s chief opponents hope to emphasize domestic issues, such as the intensifying crisis of medical care provided by the National Health System (NHS). Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn promised to run a campaign “challenging the economic narrative that says there have to be huge cuts in public expenditure” and calling on taxpayers to “invest in the future, invest in infrastructure.” Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon vowed to oppose the “increasingly right-wing direction” of May’s government, including opposing “the hardest possible Brexit … more austerity and deeper cuts” to the budget.

Who is likely to win?

Barring a radical upheaval in the electorate – which is always a possibility – May looks to win in a landslide. A YouGov poll performed for the Times this week shows May with an astonishing 21-points lead over Corbyn. That marks Labour’s lowest rating since Margaret Thatcher’s victory in 1983. YouGov forecasts a shift of as many as 56 seats from Labour to the Tories in June. A victory would extend May’s term as prime minister until 2022.

What does the election mean for the nation’s future?

The pound surged to its highest level in months after the announcement. (It briefly dipped this morning over fears May planned to resign.)

Long-term, it strengthens Theresa May’s hand, internally and externally.

“Some are worried that this will allow Mrs. May to push ahead with a ‘super-hard’ Brexit that inflicts unnecessary damage on the economy,” wrote Julian Jessop of the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA). “But these fears are difficult to square with the government’s increasingly moderate rhetoric on many issues – notably migration. Instead, the Conservative leadership is likely to use the election as a chance to secure a mandate for the type of Brexit that most people appear to want. There is already plenty of evidence that the public are swinging behind Mrs. May’s more conciliatory approach.”

Politically, it will give PM May – who was never elected in a national election – a popular mandate to pursue Brexit and carry out her domestic agenda. In 2015, David Cameron won election as prime minister with a 17-seat majority. But he opposed Brexit and stepped down after Remain lostlast June’s Brexit referendum, 52-48.Up to a dozen Tory backbenchers have rebelled against May’s plans on Article 50 and school reform. Former MP Paul Goodman argues that the Conservative Party’s candidate selection rules will allow May to remake the party in her own image.

However, Jessop worries that one negative byproduct of the snap election is that parties will “simply mitments from previous manifestos even though the case for them is (now) weak.” Since there is little time to craft new policy proposals, parties will simply recycle outdated planks, artificially extending their intellectual lives.

Since May’s Tory Party has been governing, its members enjoy a significant advantage in formulating detailed plans for the election they are all but certain to win.

BY 2.0.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Education Reform: We’re Doing It Wrong
In this American Enterprise Institute Vision Talk, Chancellor of DC Public Schools Kaya Henderson talks about the state of public education reform. She says we have the opportunity to change everything we’ve been doing wrong in education for the past 100 years, but we are failing at the task. How, she asks, do we consistently produce quality education for all children? Can it even be done? It is interesting to note that one focal point of Henderson’s talk munity. Although...
Yep, the Social Sciences Really Are Biased Against Conservatives
“Psychologists have demonstrated the value of diversity—particularly diversityof viewpoints—for enhancing creativity, discovery, and problem solving,” say a team of social scientists in a new paper. “But one key type of viewpoint diversity is lacking in academic psychology in general and social psychology in particular: political diversity.” Social psychology is an interdisciplinary domain that bridges the gap between psychology and sociology by studying how people’s thoughts, feelings, and behaviors are influenced by the actual, imagined, or implied presence of others. The...
The High Price of Human Trafficking
“Human trafficking is broader in scope than most people realize,” says Elise Hilton in this week’s Acton Commentary. Today, human trafficking impacts entire industries, and job sectors – both legitimate and illegitimate. Monetarily, it is the second largest criminal activity in the world. Only the illegal drug trade is more profitable. The profits generated from human trafficking play an enormous role in national and global economies. There is also the untold human cost. It is, as Pope Francis said, an...
Monks and Markets
Not Abba Pistamon Today at Ethika Politika, I examine some ancient economic wisdom from one of the desert fathers: Abba Pistamon. Far from the newest of Nintendo’s Pokemon monsters (despite the sound of his name), Abba Pistamon was one of the first Christian monks. The dialogue between him and an unnamed brother that I examine from the Sayings of the Desert Fathers has a lot to say about production, labor, profit, and exchange. I write, Far from a gnostic allergy...
Audio: Gregg on Discomfort With Pope Francis
Samuel Gregg, Director of Research at the Acton Institute, joins host Al Kresta on Ave Maria Radio’s Kresta in the Afternoon to discuss the level of fort that some conservative Catholics have felt in recent months with the pontificateof Pope Francis. Is the pope a liberal, as he is sometimes portrayed by the media? Does he hold to longstanding teachings of the Catholic Church? Gregg and Kresta address these and other issues, and take calls from listeners in this half-hour...
Audio: Samuel Gregg on Relevant Radio
Acton Institute Director of Research Samuel Gregg has a busy calendar of media appearances these days; late last week, he joined host Sheila Liaugminas on Relevant Radio’s A Closer Lookfor a full broadcast hour to discuss the ing year in politics and wider society. That interview is available for your listening enjoyment via the audio player below. He’ll also be appearing this afternoon during the five o’clock hour on Ave Maria Radio’sKresta in the Afternoon; streaming audio will be available...
How Much Does Government Regulation Cost America?
What is the annual cost of regulations for America? The short answer is that no one knows for sure. The officially reported regulatory costs as reported by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) total up to $128.7 billion. But the real costs of regulation is impossible since, as the Nobel-winning economist James Buchanan said, “Cost cannot be measured by someone other than the decision-maker because there is no way that subjective experience can be directly observed.” Still, we can...
Firstfruits Economics
“Honor the Lord with your wealth and with the firstfruits of all your produce.” –Proverbs 3:9 In his latest video, Dan Stevers highlights the importance of giving God our first and our best, focusing mostly on the story of Cain and Abel. “The concept of firstfruits extends to every aspect of our lives,” he writes. “God doesn’t accept leftovers; God must be first.” The video contains excerpts from Robert Morris’ popular book, The Blessed Life: Unlocking the Rewards of Generous...
The KKK, Selma, and southern Christianity
Two January 2015 film releases provide great opportunities for Christians to examine the not so admirable aspects of American church history in order to learn from the mistakes and successes of the past. First, the newly released movie Selma tells of the story of the passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the public protests leading up to LBJ signing the bill into law. My parents were born and raised during Jim Crow and the movie does a...
Review: In Praise of the Bourgeois, Liberty-Loving Race of Hobbits
In light of the discussion about distributism in the ments, I’m posting John Zmirak’s excellent Religion & Liberty review of The Hobbit Party: The Vision of Freedom that Tolkien Got and the West Forgot by Jonathan Witt and Jay Richards (Ignatius Press, 2014) here on the PowerBlog. Note how he ends the review with a discussion of Tolkien and whether his work lent support to distributism. Have at it. In Praise of the Bourgeois, Liberty-Loving Race of Hobbits By John...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved