Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY
/
Jewish theology and economic theory
Jewish theology and economic theory
Apr 20, 2025 8:57 PM

There has been very little work by orthodox Jewish scholars on the relationship among socialism, capitalism, and Judaism. Careful reading of the relevant literature, however, suggests that it is possible to posit five basic axioms of Jewish economic theory from which many economic policy implications can be deduced. Although not exhaustive, our five axioms represent, to the best of our knowledge, the first attempt to formulate a parsimonious list of basic principles that help systematize the foundations of what we are calling Jewish economic theory.

Participation in the Creative Process

The first axiom of Jewish economic theory that we posit is: “Man is created in God's image.” In Judaism, this statement is interpreted as meaning that God is the creator of the world, and man is the creator in the world. Man was given a divine essence in order to be a partner with God in the act of creation (Babylonian Talmud Shabbat 10a). The Midrash says, “All that was created during the six days that God created the world still requires work” (Genesis Rabba 11:6). God gave man an plete world, and man is supposed to help perfect it through domination of material resources, work, and innovation.

Along these lines [from Genesis], the Midrash recalls the story of Rabbi Akiva, who placed grain and bread before a general and asked him which one he would prefer to eat (Tanhuma Tazriah 19). In Judaism, work, creative activity, and innovation are the avenues through which the divine image is expressed.

Protection of Private Property

The second axiom of Jewish economic theory is that private property rights are essential and must be protected. Man was given the potential to create, but the Jewish sages clearly recognized that man will only dominate the material world and will work and innovate if there is the ability to appropriate the fruits of one's labor. To motivate man to fulfill mandment to participate in the act of creation, the granting and promising protection of private property was recognized to be essential.

Note that two of the Ten Commandments directly relate to the safeguarding of private property: “You shall not steal,” and “you shall not covet anything that belongs to your neighbor.” The prohibition against stealing includes outright robbery, but also various forms of theft by deception and unethical business practices, such as the use of false weights in a transaction. The second prohibition goes further and prohibits Jews from coveting the possessions of others, even if there is no unlawful acquisition of property. The punishment for violation of mandments is quite harsh, demonstrating the overriding importance of private property in the Jewish tradition. In fact, the flood in the time of Noah is understood by the rabbis as a punishment for sins against private property.

The Accumulation of Wealth

The third axiom of Jewish economic theory is that the accumulation of wealth is a virtue, not a vice. Man is obligated to participate in the creative process, should not be demotivated by inadequate protection of private property, and is blessed when the e of honest labor is the accumulation of wealth.

The Talmud teaches, “One who benefits from his own labor is greater than one who fears Heaven” (Berachot 8a, Avot 4:1). In the Torah, productive and virtuous workers are repeatedly rewarded with great wealth. The Torah describes in great detail the riches of the patriarchs, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. Wealth, accumulated honestly, is a signal of great effort, skill, and success in partnering with God in the creative process. The wealthy individual has been unusually successful in elevating the material world and in expressing the divine image.

The Talmud sages regard the refusal to attempt to benefit from one's labor and accumulate wealth as dangerous behavior that can lead to madness. A particularly strong statement against idleness can be found in the writings of Maimonides. Maimonides claims that “whomsoever has in his heart that he shall indulge in the study of Torah and do no work but rather be sustained from charity, defames the Lord's name, cheapens the Torah, extinguishes the light of faith, causes himself ill, and removes himself from the world e” (Mishneh Torah Laws of Oaths and Vow 8:13). Maimonides' statement is aimed at individuals who choose religious learning over working. Considering that learning Torah is itself a religious obligation, one can easily infer how much stronger his words would be for someone who chooses only leisure, whether that individual be rich or poor.

The praiseworthiness of wealth accumulation in no way implies that Judaism is not interested in the plight of the poor. All individuals are required to help the poorest members of society through charitable gifts. However, the gift-giving obligation, called Tzedakah, is more subtle than, and should not be confused with, e redistribution. e redistribution aims at reducing e inequalities because e disparities are seen as unfair or immoral — this is not the Jewish view.

Caring for the Needy

The fourth axiom of Jewish economic theory that we posit is the obligation to care for the needy through charitable giving. Meir Tamari's study of Jewish economic thought makes it clear that passionate concern for the poor is a powerful Jewish theme as it was not for the pre-Christian Greeks and Romans. The Torah mentions mandment to give charity (Tzedakah, literally justice) in parashat Re'eh: “You should not harden your heart or shut your hand from your needy brother” (Deut. 15:7-8). The role of man in the world is not only to work, create, innovate, accumulate wealth, and elevate the material world but also to care for those in need. As Maimonides explains in The Guide for the Perplexed, “we do perform an act of Tzedakah when we fulfill those duties towards our fellow men which our moral conscience imposes upon us; for example, when we heal the wounds of the sufferer.”

To understand the Jewish view of charity, it is useful to recognize that behavior is regulated by two kinds mandments in Judaism. First, there are mandments that fall under the heading of man to God. Second, there are mandments that fall under the heading of man to man. Dietary restrictions mandments in the man to God category. These are moral principles. Regulations on proper business transactions are examples mandments in the man to man category. These are considered to be legal principles. Charity belongs to the first category mandments, making it a moral principle rather than a legal one.

Limited Government

The fifth axiom of Jewish economic theory that we posit is the inefficiency of government and the dangers of concentrated power. The Torah repeatedly warns about the evil nature of government and bureaucracy. The main warning is issued in the first book of Samuel when the Israelites request a king:

These will be the rights of the king who is to reign over you. He will take your sons and assign them to his chariotry and cavalry, and they will run in front of his chariot. He will use them as leaders of a thousand and leaders of fifty; he will make them plough his ploughland and harvest his harvest and make his weapons of war and the gear for his chariots. He will also take your daughters as perfumers, cooks, and bakers. He will take the best of your fields, of your vineyards and olive groves and give them to his officials. He will tithe your crops and vineyards to provide for his eunuchs and his officials. He will take the best of your manservants and maidservants, of your cattle and your donkeys, and make them work for him. He will tithe your flocks, and you yourselves will e his slaves. When that es, you will cry out on account of the king you have chosen for yourselves, but on that day God will not answer you (1 Sam. 8:11—18).

Rabbi Sacks pared these words to Friedrich Hayek's warning in The Road to Serfdom. Simply stated, when governments play an important role in allocating resources in society and/or map out a detailed plan for the workings of an economy, we risk the prospect of ever-increasing degrees of oppression in order to meet the plan's goals.

This article has been excerpted from the ing monograph, Judaism, Markets, and Capitalism: Separating Myths from Reality.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY
Up from the Liberal Founding
During the 20th century, scholars of the American founding generally believed that it was liberal. Specifically, they saw the founding as rooted in the political thought of 17th-century English philosopher John Locke. In addition, they saw Locke as a primarily secular thinker, one who sought to isolate the role of religion from political considerations except when necessary to prop up the various assumptions he made for natural rights. These included a divine creator responsible for a rational world for...
Mistaken About Poverty
Perhaps it is because America is the land of liberty and opportunity that debates about poverty are especially intense in the United States. Americans and would-be Americans have long been told that if they work hard enough and persevere they can achieve their dreams. For many people, the mere existence of poverty—absolute or relative—raises doubts about that promise and the American experiment more generally. Is it true that America suffers more poverty than any other advanced democracy in the...
How Dispensationalism Got Left Behind
Whether we like it or not, Americans, in one way or another, have all been indelibly shaped by dispensationalism. Such is the subtext of Daniel Hummel’s provocative telling of the rise and fall of dispensationalism in America. In a little less than 350 pages, Hummel traces how a relatively insignificant Irishman from the Plymouth Brethren, John Nelson Darby, prompted the proliferation of dispensational theology, especially its eschatology, or theology of the end times, among our ecclesiastical, cultural, and political...
Creating an Economy of Inclusion
The poor have been the main subject of concern in the whole tradition of Catholic Social Teaching. The Catholic Church talks often about a “preferential option for the poor.” In recent years, many of the Church’s social teaching documents have been particularly focused on the needs of the poorest people in the world’s poorest countries. The first major analysis of this topic could be said to have been in the papal encyclical Populorum Progressio, published in 1967 by Pope...
Lord Jonathan Sacks: The West’s Rabbi
In October 1798, the president of the United States wrote to officers of the Massachusetts militia, acknowledging a limitation of federal rule. “We have no government,” John Adams wrote, “armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, and revenge or gallantry, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net.” The nation that Adams had helped to found would require the parts of the body...
Jesus and Class Warfare
Plenty of Marxists have turned to the New Testament and the origins of Christianity. Memorable examples include the works of F.D. Maurice and Zhu Weizhi’s Jesus the Proletarian. After criticizing how so many translations of the New Testament soften Jesus’ teachings regarding material possessions, greed, and wealth, Orthodox theologian David Bentley Hart has gone so far to ask, “Are Christians supposed to be Communists?” In the Huffington Post, Dan Arel has even claimed that “Jesus was clearly a Marxist,...
C.S. Lewis and the Apocalypse of Gender
From very nearly the beginning, Christianity has wrestled with the question of the body. Heretics from gnostics to docetists devalued physical reality and the body, while orthodox Christianity insisted that the physical world offers us true signs pointing to God. This quarrel persists today, and one form it takes is the general confusion among Christians and non-Christians alike about gender. Is gender an abstracted idea? Is it reducible to biological characteristics? Is it a set of behaviors determined by...
Conversation Starters with … Anne Bradley
Anne Bradley is an Acton affiliate scholar, the vice president of academic affairs at The Fund for American Studies, and professor of economics at The Institute of World Politics. There’s much talk about mon good capitalism” these days, especially from the New Right. Is this long overdue, that a hyper-individualism be beaten back, or is it merely cover for increasing state control of the economy? Let me begin by saying that I hate “capitalism with adjectives” in general. This...
Spurgeon and the Poverty-Fighting Church
Religion & Liberty: Volume 33, Number 4 Spurgeon and the Poverty-Fighting Church by Christopher Parr • October 30, 2023 Portrait of Charles Spurgeon by Alexander Melville (1885) Charles Spurgeon was a young, zealous 15-year-old boy when he came to faith in Christ. A letter to his mother at the time captures the enthusiasm of his newfound Christian faith: “Oh, how I wish that I could do something for Christ.” God granted that wish, as Spurgeon would e “the prince of...
Adam Smith and the Poor
Adam Smith did not seem to think that riches were requisite to happiness: “the beggar, who suns himself by the side of the highway, possesses that security which kings are fighting for” (The Theory of Moral Sentiments). But he did not mend beggary. The beggar here is not any beggar, but Diogenes the Cynic, who asked of Alexander the Great only to step back so as not to cast a shadow upon Diogenes as he reclined alongside the highway....
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved