Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Baltimore Mom: Abusive Or Responsible?
Baltimore Mom: Abusive Or Responsible?
Apr 26, 2025 11:55 AM

There was some water cooler talk here in the office the other day as the video of the Baltimore mom went viral. That’s the mother who recognized her son as one of the rioters, and slapped him about the head with some degree of ferocity, then put him in the car and took him home.

The mother has since been identified as Toya Graham, who happened upon her son, brick in hand, when she realized school had let out early due to the riots. Graham had forbidden her son the night before from going to the area where the riots were taking place, and he promised he would not. When she realized he was not at home, she went looking for him.

Some of the coffee klatsch questions raised:

Was the mom being abusive?If mom was abusive, and the son was raised in an abusive atmosphere, did that lead him to being a willing participant in a violent protest?If that were your kid, what would you have done?

Social media is split: Mom was abusive, and in a different setting would likely be brought up on charges. Others hail her as “mom of the year.” From USA Today:

“Hypocrisy of the law, she should be arrested for assault, battery and child abuse,” said one tweet by a user identified as @cotrial.

Others questioned why anyone would condone or celebrate her actions.

“Tired of hearing about this Baltimore ‘Mom of the Year,’ ” said a tweet under the handle @DaAnGrYASiAN. “If she raised her son better, she wouldn’t have needed to do that.”

Was the mother justified in her reaction? Should she have first attempted to reason with her son, telling him to put the brick down, join her at the local coffee shop and they could discuss his feelings regarding the situation?

Corporal punishment of children is, of course, a subject on debate. What was once considered “normal” is now considered abusive (and much of what once passed as “discipline” certainly should be considered abusive.) Does a swift slap to a diapered bottom constitute abuse, however? More to the point here, if your child were in a dangerous situation (say, a riot) would you, as a parent, not do anything in your power to remove that kid from said situation?

I’m sure a lot of office break rooms were buzzing this week about the same thing. I can only speak for myself: I would have done the same thing as the mom in Baltimore. Graham and her son spoke to CNN’s Anderson Cooper:

I said, ‘You weren’t brought up like this,’ ” Graham said.

He’s not a perfect child, but he’s also not a thug, she said.

The 16-year-old boy said he understood that his mother was there looking out for him.

“She didn’t want me to get in trouble (with the) law. She didn’t want me to be like another Freddie Gray,” he said, referring to the 25-year-old man who died of a severe spinal injury after being arrested by Baltimore police.

According to the best science available, teens’ brains are not fully developed, and don’t typically pletely until they are in their mid-twenties. (We need to take into account individual differences, cultures and many other factors, but this statement holds true in most cases.) While teens can be very smart, they also tend to act much more emotionally and impulsively than adults. Their brains are often under hormonal “assault,” and the teen brain simply does not process the link between personal behavior and likely es very well.

If my toddler wandered out into the path of a car, would I yank him back to safety? Of course. If I walked in on a boy sexually assaulting my daughter would I pull him off in a manner that could be interpreted as violent? You bet. If my teen were in the middle of a riot, brick in hand, would I get him out of there, forcefully if necessary? Yup.

I do not justify abuse towards a child (and it was clear from the video that, at least in this instance, the boy was not hurt), but sometimes parenting is by “any means necessary,” and in this case, I side with the mom.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Acton University Friday Photo Recap
Friday was the last day of Acton University 2012. Here are a few photos from the day’s events. Did you miss AU this year? Be sure to check out our downloadable lectures here. AU participants walk to the DeVos Convention Center Anthony Bradley reviews the AU speaker listing AU participants walk to an ing session Andreas Widmer talks to Rev. Robert Sirico Grand Rapids from the DeVos Convention Center Speaker Rudy Carrasco checks puter during AU AU participants at the...
Government’s Purpose Is to Improve Health?
In an interview with Charlie Rose on CBS’s This Morning, New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg said, If government’s purpose isn’t to improve the health and longevity of its citizens, I don’t know what its purpose is. Since Bloomberg seems to be unclear about the purpose of government, perhaps we should make him a list. How about: establishing justice, insuring domestic tranquility, providing for mon defense, promoting the general welfare, and securing the blessings of liberty for ourselves and our...
Acton University Thursday Photo Recap
Thursday at Acton University included a lot of high quality lectures, including ones from Eric Metaxas, Victor Claar, Samuel Gregg, Jon Pinheiro, and Jonathan Witt. Here are just a few photos of the day’s events. If you’d like to listen to some of these lectures, we have a digital downloads page for AU2012 set up where you can buy each for $0.99 here. AU participants prepare for the PovertyCure screening Grand Rapids, MI in the evening Eric Metaxas makes a...
Interviews on Innovation, Distributism, Communitarianism, and Vocational Stewardship
Last week we mentioned the interviews of Rev. Sirico and Andreas Widmer conducted by Joseph Gorra. Over the weekend Gorra added four more excellent interviews of Acton University faculty. The first is an interview with Kishore Jayabalan, director of Istituto Acton in Rome, on Distributism as a ‘Third Way’: Gorra: Why do you think distributist premises are so appealing to some? Jayabalan: Distributism is appealing because it recognizes that there is more to life than economics and especially the production...
Business as Moral Enterprise
One of the excellent presentations at Acton University today was Andreas Widmer’s class on “Business as a Moral Enterprise.” For those who missed it, Joe Gorra of the Evangelical Philosophical Society recently interviewed Widmer, a Research Fellow in Entrepreneurship at the Acton Institute, on that same topic: Gorra: Entrepreneurship is in your bones. You are the co-founder of the SEVEN Fund, which is doing some remarkable work “to dramatically increase the rate of innovation and diffusion of enterprise-based solutions to...
Interview: Rev. Sirico responds to ‘Is Capitalism Immoral?’
On the Patheos Evangelical channel, Joseph E. Gorra talks to Rev. Robert A. Sirico, Acton Institute president and co-founder, about the publication of his new book, Defending the Free Market: The Moral Case for a Free Economy. Gorra frames the interview with this question: “Countless detractors over the years have argued that capitalism is intrinsically immoral. Is it true?” Patheos: As you know, “capitalism” and “free markets” often invoke all sorts of various (even contradictory) images and ideas for different...
Truth and Blessings at Acton University
On the drive over to Acton University this morning I heard an argument on the radio about how the economy would have been fixed if only the dollar amount of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 would have been doubled. What a sad statement to pin your hope to in order to fix the American economy. That argument is unlikely to be uttered at Acton University. Fixing economic problems and lifting up the human condition is not measured...
Doubling Down on Pascal’s Wager
The Christian Reformed Church in North America (CRCNA) held its annual synod this week, and among the items it dealt with were overtures and mendations related to the issues of climate change and creation care. The synod adopted statements along the following lines: There is a near-consensus in the munity that climate change is occurring and very likely is caused by human activity.Human-induced climate change is an ethical, social justice, and religious issue.The CRC pelled to take private and public...
Make the Moral Case for Free Enterprise and Win $40,000
If you have a videocamera and can make the moral case for free enterprise, then our friends at the American Enterprise Institute have the contest for you: The American Enterprise Institute is serious about reinvigorating America’s spirit of free enterprise. Big ambitions require big promotions, which is why AEI is proud to announce a $50,000 video contest, “Make the Moral Case for Free Enterprise,” to unleash the market’s creative potential. We’re calling on everyone who loves America’s system of free...
Listen to Acton University Lectures Anywhere
Were you unable to attend Acton University 2012? Want to hear a lecture you missed? You’re in luck, because we have (almost) all of the lectures available so far. Stay tuned to grab them as they’re posted to our digital lecture store. Here’s what’s available so far: Day 1 – June 12 A Conversation with Michael Novak Day 2 – June 13 Christian Anthropology (’12) – Dr. Samuel GreggPerson and Property in the Pentateuch – Dr. David BakerThe Church and...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved