Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY
/
Affirm NATO’s High Performers
Affirm NATO’s High Performers
Apr 19, 2025 8:15 AM

  This month marks 75 years since the founding of the NATO alliance. Celebrations will include two very capable new members of the alliance, Finland and Sweden, who opted to break from neutrality and join the alliance shortly after Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Despite NATO’s recent growth and defiant unity as Putin sought to fracture the alliance in the early days of Moscow’s assault on Ukraine, recent years have seen not only an impassioned debate about US support for Ukraine’s defense but also a reinvigorated debate about the United States’ commitment to NATO.

  This debate is primarily playing out among certain segments of the American political right. It occurs against the backdrop of Congress trying to pass additional assistance for Ukraine as the country fights to liberate its territory from Russian forces, the misconception that Europe is lagging behind in military and economic assistance to Kyiv, China’s emergence as the US pacing threat, and a contentious presidential election rematch.

  There is legitimate debate about the prioritization of US defense resources in what has been dubbed a new Cold War with the China-Russia-Iran axis. Some, like former Pentagon official Elbridge Colby, argue that Ukraine’s fight is noble, but that Europe must take the lead in arming Ukraine and in its own security so the that United States can focus on deterring an attack on Taiwan by the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and on defending its interests in the Indo-Pacific.

  And while the conclusion is questionable, not least because China is backing Russia’s war, this argument for prioritization of the Indo-Pacific at the expense of arming Ukraine seemingly comes on earnest policy grounds. Others, however, have taken it further: bringing not only America’s support for Ukraine but also its commitment to NATO and Article V into question.

  This debate culminated last month when former President Donald Trump publicly recalled conversations he had as president warning NATO leaders that he would allow and even “encourage” Russia to do whatever it wanted to the NATO members failing to meet the two percent of GDP threshold on defense.

  Some ideologically aligned Senators quickly reinforced President Trump’s remarks. “I would be worried. I would be very worried. Especially if they dont have 2% of their GDP in defense. I mean youve got to be able to protect yourself—we cant protect everybody,” said Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama. “I want to have a system where if you don’t pay, you get kicked out,” added Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina.

  But a central, and too often missing, point in the debate about NATO is that the allies most vulnerable to continued Russian aggression are the high performers, both since and in the lead-up to Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. These Central and Eastern European nations largely meet the defense spending goals of the alliance, have moved quicker and harder to support Ukraine than Washington, and never lost sight of Russia’s ongoing threat to the alliance or the need for the hard power military edge to deter it.

  It’s no mystery why these nations are attuned to the importance of a strong national defense. When multiple generations of your ancestors lived behind Moscow’s brutal Iron Curtain, it’s easier to believe Putin’s threats and think he will make good on them. Being upstanding members of NATO is also a way for these populations to exhibit their overwhelming gratitude for their sovereignty and reintegration with the West.

  The strength of NATO is in its adversaries being convinced of NATO member nations’ capability to defend any member, and of its political resolve to defend any member. To the extent a lack of resolve is communicated, as former President Trump did, it risks creating fissures within the alliance and tempting adversary aggression.

  What stands between NATO’s lowest spenders and Russian forces is a bloc of high contributing nations who are leading the way to re-energize the alliance and rectify Europe’s view of the threat.

  The reality is the foot-draggers in NATO are largely located in Western Europe. What stands between these lower-on-average spenders on defense and Putin is this bloc of clear-eyed, high-contributing nations. But even if former President Trump would urge the United States to come to their defense based on their meeting these qualifications, his calling into question the American commitment to Article V of the alliance makes this more and not less likely. It is a profound and unforced error as the US seeks to deter further Russian aggression.

  Last year, 11 NATO member states met the two percent threshold. Of those 11, eight are countries that have joined the alliance in the post-Cold War era. Those eight are Poland and Hungary (accession in 1999); Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovakia, Romania (2004); and Finland (2023). The United States, United Kingdom, and Greece make up the remaining three. In 2024, eighteen member states are on track to spend at least two percent of GDP on defense. Much of the credit goes to Putin, but also to former President Trump, who rightfully pushed the low spenders during his time in office. This year, NATO allies’ defense spending is on course for a six-fold increase since the 2014 Wales Declaration. That is an astounding accomplishment.

  And it is the Eastern front nations who joined the alliance in the rounds of post-Cold War NATO enlargement that are leading the way. In 2022, the year of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Poland was spending 2.4 percent of GDP on defense. That number jumped to 3.9 percent in 2023 and is set to exceed 4.0 percent of GDP in 2024. The government of Estonia in 2012—two years before the Wales Declaration—signed an agreement to boost and maintain defense spending at 2 percent of GDP. This year, Estonia’s defense expenditures will account for over 3 percent of GDP for the first time. Tallinn has also sent the equivalent of 1.35 percent of its total GDP in military and humanitarian aid to Ukraine.

  In 2022, another Eastern front nation, Lithuania, increased defense spending by almost 50 percent over the previous year. Vilnius’ defense spending for 2024 stands around 2.75 percent of GDP. And Latvia’s defense spending is planned at 2.4 percent of GDP in 2024, reaching 3 percent of GDP by 2027. That puts all the Baltic nations near the very top of the list of NATO member states who spend the most on defense, with Poland surpassing the United States as the NATO nation spending the highest percentage of its GDP on defense expenditures.

  These same nations have been pushing the Biden administration to support Ukraine faster and with more advanced weaponry. Before Russia’s February 2022 large-scale invasion of Ukraine, these countries were sounding the alarm about the sincerity of the Russian threat. While the Biden administration dithered on a military aid package, on January 21, 2022, the Baltic states announced they had US approval to send weapons to Ukraine—Javelin anti-tank missiles from Estonia and Stinger anti-aircraft missiles from Latvia and Lithuania. Days later, on January 26, the Czech Republic announced a shipment of 152 mm ammunition to Kyiv. The frontline nations led and delivered at a crucial moment for the alliance.

  While in office, former President Trump pushed allies to contribute more to collective defense, became the first US president to send Javelins to Ukraine, and imposed sanctions on Nord Stream 2. These are all decisive achievements for European security, which he should take pride in.

  But what stands between NATO’s lowest spenders and Russian forces is a bloc of high-contributing nations who are leading the way to re-energize the alliance and rectify Europe’s view of the threat. The correct message to send is that the United States has the back of these nations, that NATO must continue to do more, that the United States remains the coalescing force, and that Vladimir Putin better not dare to expand his war.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY
The Constitutional Line on Direct Taxes
  The idea of a federal wealth tax recently has become a popular cause among “progressives.” The question arises, however, of whether such a tax would be constitutional.   In theory, a federal wealth tax could pass constitutional muster. But unless it qualified under the Constitution as an “indirect tax” rather than as a “direct” one, its projected revenue would have to...
The Filters of Justice
  “There are no solutions,” Thomas Sowell says. “There are only trade offs.” When considering policy and legal problems, tradeoffs must often be understood in light of the challenge of filtering: correctly sorting people, actions, or events into categories. The filter can be too wide or too narrow, and both flaws have costs.   Prominent changes in American law and policy based...
Who Are You Leaning On?
  Who Are You Leaning On?   By: Anne Peterson   Trust in the Lord with all your heart,and do not lean on your own understanding.In all your ways acknowledge him,and he will make straight your paths.- Proverbs 3:5-6   It was April 1972 when Bill Withers wrote the song, Lean on Me. A song many are familiar with. It addresses how we all...
God Disciplines Us in Love
  God Disciplines Us in Love   Weekly Overview:   There is no better father than Creator God. He formed us and knows us. He provides for us, loves us unconditionally, and longs for real, life-giving relationship with us. He runs out to meet us in our sin, clothes us with new identity, and restores to us the abundant life he has always...
A Prayer to Keep Jesus My Refuge
  A Prayer to Keep Jesus as My Refuge   By Chelsey DeMatteis   “He who dwells in the shelter of the Most High will abide in the shadow of the Almighty. I will say to the Lord, ‘My refuge and my fortress, my God, in whom I trust.’” - Psalm 91:1-2   Blessed are those who take refuge in Him, can I get...
The Shepherd’s Desire
  Weekend, August 3, 2024   The Shepherd’s Desire   “The thief’s purpose is to steal and kill and destroy. My purpose is to give them a rich and satisfying life.” (John 10:10 NLT)   What is the desire of the Good Shepherd for His sheep? His desire for His flock is for them to flourish. He wants them to be well-fed and cared...
AI Among the Austrians
  Dozens of startups now offer Artificial Intelligence tools to help businesses set market prices. Assuming unlimited computing power to run such models and comprehensive data sets to train them, can AI replicate the way human actors make decisions in the marketplace? Socialists have argued for more than a century that enlightened bureaucrats can set prices as well as the myriad...
Venezuelan Churches Brace for Migration Wave After Maduro’s Re
  Last Sunday, July 28, pastor Csar Mermejo preached about hope in difficult times to his congregation in Maracay, a city of 1.3 million that sits close to the Caribbean coast.   But he did so via a pre-recorded audio file he distributed via WhatsApp, following the governments advisory against in-person gatherings on Election Day.   In his digital broadcast to Comunidad Cristiana...
Jehovah Rohi: God Is Our Good Shepherd (Psalm 23:1)
  Jehovah Rohi – God is Our Good Shepherd   By Jennifer Kostick   Today's Bible Verse:The Lord is my shepherd; I shall not want.- Psalm 23:1   When I was a little girl, age ten, my grandfather passed away. The paternal side of my family was not active in church and to my knowledge knew nothing about the Jesus my next door neighbors...
Black Christian Leaders Find Hope with Kamala Harris
  Vice President Kamala Harris isnt the type of politician to cite the Bible a lot.   Darryl Ford, the former pastor of a nondenominational evangelical church in Atlanta, thinks that might be a good thing.   Weve gotten used to seeing people who will make Bible quotations and pray for me on a Sunday, then vote to disenfranchise me on a Tuesday,...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved