Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Gratitude: The heart of capitalism
Gratitude: The heart of capitalism
Jan 21, 2026 11:09 PM

As we gather around our Thanksgiving tables with our loved ones, we’re reminded of the imperative of gratitude. Counting our blessings is an integral part of the Christian life and increasingly recognized by science as having physical and psychological benefits. But does our economic system of free enterprise undermine our ability to give thanks?

Prevailing wisdom has long held that capitalism feeds discontent. New products continually debut, provoking new desires and making consumers dissatisfied with their passé – but perfectly functioning – goods. “Since it was decreed a few decades ago that capitalism would have to expand by selling people things they didn’t need, rather than have them replace things when they wore out,” wrote Nina Power in the Guardian, “we have been coerced into thinking about quality of life in terms of owning and accumulating more things.” In this view, capitalism guts gratitude.

Collectivism administered by the welfare state, the argument goes, teaches contentment. Each person gets what he needs, and no one is permitted to have “too much.” mand economy orients production toward satisfying human rights, not catering to fleeting fashions. Once we embrace full economic collectivism, the Democratic Socialists of America explains, “our material needs are securely met by a fair distribution and sharing of resources, and our psychological needs are met through an ethos fostering cooperation rather than acquisition petition.” A new consciousness will emerge, and each person will live simply that others may simply live.

This theory has convinced generations of impressionable people to pay heed to the siren song of collectivism, to their regret. But this analysis has it precisely backwards.

Socialism is built by nurturing envy and grievance. Its supporters’ laser-like focus on “inequality” blames the system while ignoring such factors as differing gifts, circumstances, ages, and a myriad of personal choices varying from educational attainment to substance abuse.

After stoking dissatisfaction, politicians vie to outdo one another by promising more lavish benefits – and assuring they are human rights. “Single payer health insurance is what our family, friends, neighbors munities deserve,” wrote a supporter of Bernie Sanders’ Medicare for All bill. “We deserve continuous, affordable health insurance regardless of e, marital status, age or employment.” Similarly supporters of “free” college tuition encouraged their fellow members of the National Education Association, “as educators and union members of the largest teachers’ union in the nation,” to “fight” for the “[f]ree higher education, and the public colleges and universities our nation deserves.”

By operation, socialism or the welfare state seizes what belongs to others and redistributes it to those who have not earned it. In the end, it claims ever more public treasure, and freedom. “Envy is the mother of murder,” said St. John Chrysostom, and Marxism’s past (and present) continually verifies his wisdom.

Capitalism is infused with gratitude. Goods or services only change hands through a well-developed process of mutual agreement. Each party must willingly offer something that the other values. So long as the price is right, the consumer willingly pays the seller more than cost – and that is precisely where gratitude hides in plain sight. The retailer thanks the customer for his patronage, and the consumer rewards the seller with a profit for meeting his needs.

Free exchange teaches that the inventor deserves to make money for his innovation, the entrepreneur for his initiative, and the investor for his willingness to take a chance.

Profit is another name for gratitude. Profits are a tangible form of thanksgiving to hundreds or thousands of people – from factory workers, to shareholders, to CEOs – whom we will never meet and whose names we will never know.

When this system is coupled with a proper conception of limited government, it teaches that I have no claim on the labor or e of others. All market exchanges must be freely given in an act of mutual benefit.

If someone is unhappy with life’s current circumstances, that person has to change them by ing more productive at work, inventing a new or improved product, or offering a beneficial service – touching off a new gratitude cycle.

This ingenious system has unleashed the greatest growth of wealth and well-being in human history by rewarding service, diligence, prudence, thrift, and hard work. The freedom to choose (properly understood) assures that all free transactions contain a measure of gratitude on behalf of both parties.

That system, the plenty it provides, and the cornucopia of blessings that Providence has placed on each of our tables is well worth celebrating, at Thanksgiving and all year long.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Work as if It Mattered
The conversations over the last few weeks here on work have raised a couple of questions. In the context of criticisms on the perspectives on work articulated by Lester DeKoster and defended by menter John E. asks, “…what is it that you hope readers will change in their lives, and why?” I want to change people’s view of their work. I want them to see how it has value not simply as a means to some other end, but in...
Journal of Religion and Business Ethics
The latest issue of the newly launched Journal of Religion and Business Ethics is now available (vol. 1, no. 2). Check out the contents at their website. From the journal’s about page: “The Journal of Religion and Business Ethics is a peer-reviewed journal that examines the ethical and religious issues that arise in the modern business setting. While much attention has been given to the philosophical treatment of business ethics, this is the first journal to address the more inclusive...
Envy: A Deadly (Economic) Sin
Victor Claar, Acton University lecturer and professor of economics at Henderson State University, will give a talk tonight in Washington, D.C., hosted by AEI, “Grieving the Good of Others: Envy and Economics.” If you are in the area, you are encouraged to attend and hear Dr. Claar as well as two respondents discuss the topic of envy and its moral and economic consequences. Here’s a description of the event: Critics of capitalism often argue that this economic system is irretrievably...
Radio Free Acton: The Stewardship of Art, Part 2
Last week, we posted part 1 of our podcast on the proper Christian stewardship of art; for those who have been waiting for the conclusion, we’re happy to present part 2. David Michael Phelps continues to lead the discussion between Professors Nathan Jacobs and Calvin Seerveld, who previously debated this topic in the Controversy section of our Journal of Markets & Morality. The first portion of that exchange is available at the link for part 1; the remainder of the...
The Politics of Crony Unionism
Last week’s Acton Commentary and blog post focused on my claims about “crony unionism” and how the intimate relationship between Big Labor and Big Government corrupt both. Here’s another instance of the kinds of gross conflicts of interest produced by this relationship: It’s hard to see this as anything but partisan pandering on the part of the largest public sector union, the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME). Meanwhile, the Washington Post asks, “Was politics behind the...
Explaining the New Democratic Logo
“The new Democratic logo is so bad that the intellectual rot in the official announcement went largely unnoticed.” The rest of my piece is here at The American Spectator. ...
Mandating Monolithic Medicine
Among the warnings sounded as the Democratic health care reform bill was being debated was that the federal insurance mandate included in the bill—even though not national health care per se—would essentially give the federal government control of the insurance industry. The reason: If everyone is forced to buy insurance, then the government must deem what sort of insurance qualifies as adequate to meet the mandate. This piece of Obamacare promises to turn every medical procedure into a major political...
Rev. Sirico: Respect others’ rights, but also their values
A new column by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, president and co-founder of the Acton Institute, was published today in the Detroit News. This column will also be linked in tomorrow’s Acton News & Commentary. Sign up for the free weekly Acton newsletter here. +++++++++ Faith and policy: Respect others’ rights, but also their values FATHER ROBERT SIRICO If such an award were to be given for the Most Contentious Religious Story of 2010, the two main contenders would undoubtedly be...
The Daily Show Takes on a Union
The Daily Show exposes some union hypocrisy (HT). In the words of the union local head, es down to greed”: ...
A Lesson from Michigan: Time to End Crony Unionism
In this week’s Acton Commentary, I take a look at the prospects of “right-to-work” legislation in Michigan, “A Lesson from Michigan: Time to End Crony Unionism.” One of the things that disturbs me the most about what I call “crony unionism” is the hand-in-glove relationship between the labor unions and big government. We have the same kind of special pleading and rent seeking in this system as we do in crony capitalism, but the labor unions enjoy such special protection...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved