Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Gratitude: The heart of capitalism
Gratitude: The heart of capitalism
Jan 29, 2026 11:48 PM

As we gather around our Thanksgiving tables with our loved ones, we’re reminded of the imperative of gratitude. Counting our blessings is an integral part of the Christian life and increasingly recognized by science as having physical and psychological benefits. But does our economic system of free enterprise undermine our ability to give thanks?

Prevailing wisdom has long held that capitalism feeds discontent. New products continually debut, provoking new desires and making consumers dissatisfied with their passé – but perfectly functioning – goods. “Since it was decreed a few decades ago that capitalism would have to expand by selling people things they didn’t need, rather than have them replace things when they wore out,” wrote Nina Power in the Guardian, “we have been coerced into thinking about quality of life in terms of owning and accumulating more things.” In this view, capitalism guts gratitude.

Collectivism administered by the welfare state, the argument goes, teaches contentment. Each person gets what he needs, and no one is permitted to have “too much.” mand economy orients production toward satisfying human rights, not catering to fleeting fashions. Once we embrace full economic collectivism, the Democratic Socialists of America explains, “our material needs are securely met by a fair distribution and sharing of resources, and our psychological needs are met through an ethos fostering cooperation rather than acquisition petition.” A new consciousness will emerge, and each person will live simply that others may simply live.

This theory has convinced generations of impressionable people to pay heed to the siren song of collectivism, to their regret. But this analysis has it precisely backwards.

Socialism is built by nurturing envy and grievance. Its supporters’ laser-like focus on “inequality” blames the system while ignoring such factors as differing gifts, circumstances, ages, and a myriad of personal choices varying from educational attainment to substance abuse.

After stoking dissatisfaction, politicians vie to outdo one another by promising more lavish benefits – and assuring they are human rights. “Single payer health insurance is what our family, friends, neighbors munities deserve,” wrote a supporter of Bernie Sanders’ Medicare for All bill. “We deserve continuous, affordable health insurance regardless of e, marital status, age or employment.” Similarly supporters of “free” college tuition encouraged their fellow members of the National Education Association, “as educators and union members of the largest teachers’ union in the nation,” to “fight” for the “[f]ree higher education, and the public colleges and universities our nation deserves.”

By operation, socialism or the welfare state seizes what belongs to others and redistributes it to those who have not earned it. In the end, it claims ever more public treasure, and freedom. “Envy is the mother of murder,” said St. John Chrysostom, and Marxism’s past (and present) continually verifies his wisdom.

Capitalism is infused with gratitude. Goods or services only change hands through a well-developed process of mutual agreement. Each party must willingly offer something that the other values. So long as the price is right, the consumer willingly pays the seller more than cost – and that is precisely where gratitude hides in plain sight. The retailer thanks the customer for his patronage, and the consumer rewards the seller with a profit for meeting his needs.

Free exchange teaches that the inventor deserves to make money for his innovation, the entrepreneur for his initiative, and the investor for his willingness to take a chance.

Profit is another name for gratitude. Profits are a tangible form of thanksgiving to hundreds or thousands of people – from factory workers, to shareholders, to CEOs – whom we will never meet and whose names we will never know.

When this system is coupled with a proper conception of limited government, it teaches that I have no claim on the labor or e of others. All market exchanges must be freely given in an act of mutual benefit.

If someone is unhappy with life’s current circumstances, that person has to change them by ing more productive at work, inventing a new or improved product, or offering a beneficial service – touching off a new gratitude cycle.

This ingenious system has unleashed the greatest growth of wealth and well-being in human history by rewarding service, diligence, prudence, thrift, and hard work. The freedom to choose (properly understood) assures that all free transactions contain a measure of gratitude on behalf of both parties.

That system, the plenty it provides, and the cornucopia of blessings that Providence has placed on each of our tables is well worth celebrating, at Thanksgiving and all year long.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
No, the Pope doesn’t need distributism (because nobody does)
Pope Francis needs distributism, argues Arthur W. Hunt III in the latest issue of The American Conservative. Hunt says that Americans and popes alike can embrace a humane alternative to modern capitalism: In the midst of their scramble to claim the new Pope, many on the left missed what the Pontiff said was a nonsolution. The problems of the poor, he said, could not be solved by a “simple welfare mentality.” Well, by what then? The document is clear: “a...
Christ’s Preferential Option for Tax Collectors
During the 20th century, the option for the poor or the preferential option for the poor was articulated as one of the basic principles of Catholic social teaching. For example, in Octogesima Adveniens (1971), Pope Paul VI writes: In teaching us charity, the Gospel instructs us in the preferential respect due to the poor and the special situation they have in society: the most fortunate should renounce some of their rights so as to place their goods generously at the...
Is American Innovation Fading?
In a fascinating essay in Mosaic, Charles Murray examines the spirit of innovation in America. He asks, As against pivotal moments in the story of human plishment, does today’s America, for instance, look more like Britain blooming at the end of the 18th century or like France fading at the end of the 19th century? If the latter, are there idiosyncratic features of the American situation that can override what seem to be longer-run tendencies? The author of Human plishment:...
Mozilla’s Statement of Faith and the Altars of Conformity
Brendan Eich, Mozilla co-founder and creator of the JavaScript programming language, was recently appointed as Mozilla’s chief executive. Just one week later, however, he was pressured to resign. His iniquity? Donating $1,000 in support of Proposition 8, a measure whose basic aim was entirely consistent with the beliefs of Barack Obama at the time. To announce Eich’s departure, Mozilla quickly movedto clarify, offering a statement of faithof sorts, filled with all the right Orwellian flourishes: Mozilla believes both in equality...
Mozilla’s Brendan Eich and Progressive Bullies
Last week was one of mixed blessings for those engaged in the U.S. political process. On the positive side, the U.S. Supreme Court – by a 5-4 margin – struck down overall limits on campaign contributions. Unfortunately, the pendulum swung in the opposite direction for Brendan Eich, co-founder and chief executive officer of Mozilla, who resigned after the Los Angeles Times disclosed his $1,000 contribution in support of California’s 2012 Proposition 8. Eich’s unfortunate circumstances bring to mind the many...
The Hegemonic Misandry Continues: ADHD
Cultural progressives often talk about something called “hegemonic masculinity.” By this progressives and feminists mean the standards we use to determine what an ideal man is in a particular culture. Michael Kimmel and Amy Aronson, in The Gendered Society Reader, describe American hegemonic masculinity this way: In an important sense there is only plete unblushing male in America: a young, married, white, urban, northern, heterosexual, Protestant, father, of college education, fully employed, of plexion, weight, and height, and a recent...
Todd Huizinga to Discuss Ukraine on WGVU
Acton’s Director of International Outreach, Todd Huizinga, recently discussed the situation in Ukraine with WGVU’s Patrick Center and Calvin College’s assistant professors of political science, Becca McBride. For West Michigan residents, the interview will be airing tonight at 8:30 PM on the WGVU Life Channel and then again Sunday morning at 10:30 AM on WGVU-HD. For some background on what’s been going on Ukraine, see the panel discussion, ‘Ukraine – The Last Frontier of the Cold War’. ...
Mozilla: Mounting The Heads Of Conservatives On Their Walls
Mitchell Baker, executive chair of Mozilla, announced on pany’s blog that Brendan Eich, former Mozilla CEO has stepped down “for Mozilla and munity.” His sin: contributing $1000 in 2008 in support of California’s Prop 8, which upheld traditional marriage. Now, Mozilla is pany that takes great pride in their – ahem – tolerance and open-mindedness. Really. Mozilla believes both in equality and freedom of speech. Equality is necessary for meaningful speech. And you need free speech to fight for equality....
7 Figures: Wages and Employment in America
[Note: This is the first post in ‘7 Figures’, a new, occasional series highlighting data and information from a variety of surveys and reports.] The U.S. Department of Labor recently released data from the Occupational Employment Statistics program, which provides employment and wage estimates by area and by industry for wage and salary workers in hundreds of occupation groups in America. Here are seven figures based on the report: 1. Retail salespersons and cashiers were the occupations with the largest...
Bridging Income Inequality: The Subsidiarity Of Friendship
There is a lot of talk about “closing the gap” and ing e inequality.” Some of it is pure socialism: Redistribute! Redistribute! Others look for ways to create jobs and help people create new financial opportunities for themselves. But what about the simple gift of friendship? At The American Conservative, Gracy Olmstead suggests that friendship can bridge e gaps, and creates safety nets for people in ways government and even private agencies cannot. We all have close friends and family...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved