Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
A biblical theology of work, Part 1: Why work?
A biblical theology of work, Part 1: Why work?
Apr 27, 2026 11:50 AM

A recent article on the Powerblog celebrating the work of delivery drivers, who never seem to be included in the definition of an “essential worker,” reminded me that we do not spend enough time thinking about work from an economic or theological point of view. This series will present a biblical theology of work in three parts over ing weeks, reflecting on both the spiritual and economic significance of work.

I begin with three brief anecdotes that illustrate why this series is necessary.

First, around 2010, someone whom I did not know sat next to me in church. The sermon was terrible – an attack on business, banking, and the market economy whose message was based on deep ignorance. After service, I chatted with the individual. I remember his words when I asked him what his work was: He simply replied, “I am hated … but hated most of all by the church. I’m a banker.”

The second illustration involved a lawyer friend of mine who worked for a major firm in the City of London. He told me that he was viewed by his church leadership as a cash machine to employ more ministry assistants. Such a viewpoint is highly destructive of human purpose and human dignity.

The third example occurred when I had lunch a few years back with a city trader who attended a well-known church. He told me, quite openly, that he deeply appreciated the teaching he had received in his church over 30 years, but nothing – literally nothing – he heard ever helped him understand his place in the economy and his role in society.

What is the significance of work? Dorothy Sayers gave an address on the subject in 1942 titled Why Work? In that address, she stated that in respect of an intelligent carpenter, “The very first demand that his religion makes upon him is that he should make good tables.”

Note also what she did not say: The role is not to convert the workforce or the customer. She went on to add that the very worst religious films she had seen were those in which the actors were chosen exclusively for their piety. This raises for us two questions:

1. What is the purpose and value of human work?

The first thing we need to do is to ask why we work at all and why our work is important. Of course, one approach is to argue that the reason we work is to put food on the table, to provide for our own wants and needs. This is known as the instrumental view of work: Work has no purpose other than to provide. You can also see how this creates the idea that work is drudgery or even cursed; work is a distraction from the truly spiritual parts of life. This leads to the second question.

2. Is the priority given to spiritual work?

This suggestion that human work possesses intrinsic value under God seems to have been replaced in much contemporary evangelical thinking by a pietism that emphasises separation from the world and that views evangelism as our only vocation. Human work is only deemed important if it enables spiritual work. Hence, the role of the Christian in business is either to convert the person at the next desk – the customer, the client, or the supplier – or to provide the money to pay for more evangelists. Such an approach is flawed; it destroys purpose and dignity in the part of our lives that occupies at least 50% of our waking hours, vitiates ethical conduct, and reduces most of our life to secondary value. My contention is that business is much, much more important to God than this view appreciates.

The purely spiritual outlook of the efficacy of work turns on its head the Reformers’ critique of medieval Catholicism and the Reformed affirmation of the intrinsic value of all human labour. However, the light of much contemporary Roman Catholic teaching – not least in several papal encyclicals which we will consider in this series – the tables seem to have turned. In his encyclical Mater et Magistra (1961), Pope John XXIII sought to show that humanity expresses itself in work. He wrote, “Every man has, of his very nature, a need to express himself in his work and thereby to perfect his own being.”

Consequently, work conveys dignity. Thus, Pope John Paul II wrote in Laborem Exercens (1981) that “man’s life is built up every day from work, from work it derives its specific dignity.” This dignity reflects the nature of the Creator Himself.

To return to Dorothy Sayers, she established the principle mon grace and the idea of creation principles. We will explore these ideas later in this series. However, what these principles suggest, in essence, is that there is something of divine and intrinsic value in work. This is affirmed in the Protestant, Roman Catholic, and Eastern Orthodox Christian traditions. Darrell Cosden, in his book The Heavenly Good of Earthly Work, pointed out, “From a Christian point of view, all human work (and not just ‘religious work’) has eternal meaning and value.” Sayers, again, wrote that work “should be looked upon, not as a necessary drudgery to be undergone for the purpose of making money, but as a way of life in which the nature of man should find its proper exercise and delight and so fulfil itself to the glory of God.”

In a biblical theology of work, work cannot merely be instrumental due to the nature and goodness of God. Of course, work is necessary for reward and provision, but it is also an expression of human purpose. Consequently – as we will see as we turn to the theological principles and the biblical narrative – enterprise, entrepreneurship, beauty, and goodness are all divine elements that we find woven into human work.

Work is a deeply theological concept.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Drunk pilots going to prison
Thomas Cloyd, 47, of Peoria, Ariz., and co-pilot Christopher Hughes, 44, of Leander, Texas, have been sentenced after a June 8 conviction for being drunk when they settled into the cockpit of a Phoenix-bound America West jetliner in 2002. The two were arrested before the plane took off just after it had pushed away from the gate. Circuit Judge David Young said he had no sympathy for Cloyd, and asked the pilots, “What were you thinking of?” Cloyd was sentenced...
Textual interpretation
A week ago Stanley Fish, a law professor at Florida International University, wrote an op-ed in The New York Times about the principles of constitutional interpretation, especially as represented by Justice Antonin Scalia. Fish takes issue especially with the notion that the text can have meaning “as it exists apart from anyone’s intention.” Fish essentially denies that texts are things that can have meanings in themselves, and it amounts to a philosophical denial of realism. Part of Fish’s problem is...
Labor (dis)union
The New York Times reports this morning that “leaders of four of the country’s largest labor unions announced on Sunday that they would boycott this week’s A.F.L.-C.I.O. convention, and officials from two of those unions, the service employees and the Teamsters, said the action was a prelude to their full withdrawal from the federation on Monday.” The withdrawal is the culmination of a period of dissatisfaction with the direction of big labor in the US. The leaders of the dissident...
Mendel’s seeds
Gregor Mendel, a monk and Abbot of Brünn, was born on this date in 1822. Mendel’s work opened up the promising and troubling field of genetics. He is often called “the father of genetics” for his study of the inheritance of traits in pea plants. For information about what might be identified as the contemporary offspring of Mendel’s work, see the Acton Environmental Newsletter on Genetically Modified Foods, including Rev. Michael Oluwatuyi’s “How Will We Feed Africa?” and my article,...
The hermeneutical spiral
Mr. Phelps takes issue with my characterization of Stanley Fish’s position as amounting “to a philosophical denial of realism.” Let me first digress a bit and place ment within the larger context of my post. My identification of a position that “words and texts have no meaning in themselves” is really just an aside within the larger and more important question about what measure of authority authorial intent has in the interpretation of documents, specifically public documents like the Constitution....
CAFTA vs. ‘Distributive Justice’
The Interfaith Working Group on Trade and Investment, a Washington-based amalgam of left-liberal religious activists, has asked the U.S. Congress to reject ratification of the Central American Free Trade Agreement. Here’s a representative statement: “Religious leaders boldly stood with impoverished people and called today for sustainable development in Central America and respect for the integrity of Creation.” Some of our best friends are impoverished? In this group’s statements, there’s scarcely an intelligible economic thought to be found or, for that...
The school of fish
The recent blogpost by my colleague Jordan Ballor discusses an op-ed written by law professor Stanley Fish. I am more familiar with Stanley Fish from his days as a literary theorist, and perhaps a quick review of a younger Fish will contribute to the conversation. Fish is known for, among other things, an idea of literary interpretation he called munities’ that suggests meaning is not found in the author, nor in the reader, but in munity in which the text...
Roadmap out of poverty
The last of many gems here: “Here’s Williams’ roadmap out of poverty: Complete high school; get a job, any kind of a job; get married before having children; and be a law-abiding citizen. Among both black and white Americans so described, the poverty rate is in the single digits.” — Walter Williams HT: The Anchoress ...
Animal cruelty?
I’m not quite sure what to make of this local story: “Four people are charged for their alleged involvement in killing two bald eagles.” The details of the alleged crimes are as follows: “Prosecutors say two teenagers shot the eagles in the Muskegon State Game Area with a .22 caliber rifle in April 2004 and then chopped them up with a hatchet.” Since the bald eagle, one of the nation’s revered symbols, is an endangered animal, it is protected by...
We must kill religion to save it
There are so many things wrong with this news item from Canada, I hardly know where to begin. But I’ll make perhaps the most obvious point of contradiction. This guy is “worried that the separation between church and state is under threat,” so he wants to initiate state control over religion, especially “given the inertia of the Catholic Church.” I’m not at all familiar with Canadian law. Is there something in Canada similar to the American Establishment Clause? ...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved