Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
A biblical theology of work, Part 1: Why work?
A biblical theology of work, Part 1: Why work?
Mar 10, 2026 3:39 AM

A recent article on the Powerblog celebrating the work of delivery drivers, who never seem to be included in the definition of an “essential worker,” reminded me that we do not spend enough time thinking about work from an economic or theological point of view. This series will present a biblical theology of work in three parts over ing weeks, reflecting on both the spiritual and economic significance of work.

I begin with three brief anecdotes that illustrate why this series is necessary.

First, around 2010, someone whom I did not know sat next to me in church. The sermon was terrible – an attack on business, banking, and the market economy whose message was based on deep ignorance. After service, I chatted with the individual. I remember his words when I asked him what his work was: He simply replied, “I am hated … but hated most of all by the church. I’m a banker.”

The second illustration involved a lawyer friend of mine who worked for a major firm in the City of London. He told me that he was viewed by his church leadership as a cash machine to employ more ministry assistants. Such a viewpoint is highly destructive of human purpose and human dignity.

The third example occurred when I had lunch a few years back with a city trader who attended a well-known church. He told me, quite openly, that he deeply appreciated the teaching he had received in his church over 30 years, but nothing – literally nothing – he heard ever helped him understand his place in the economy and his role in society.

What is the significance of work? Dorothy Sayers gave an address on the subject in 1942 titled Why Work? In that address, she stated that in respect of an intelligent carpenter, “The very first demand that his religion makes upon him is that he should make good tables.”

Note also what she did not say: The role is not to convert the workforce or the customer. She went on to add that the very worst religious films she had seen were those in which the actors were chosen exclusively for their piety. This raises for us two questions:

1. What is the purpose and value of human work?

The first thing we need to do is to ask why we work at all and why our work is important. Of course, one approach is to argue that the reason we work is to put food on the table, to provide for our own wants and needs. This is known as the instrumental view of work: Work has no purpose other than to provide. You can also see how this creates the idea that work is drudgery or even cursed; work is a distraction from the truly spiritual parts of life. This leads to the second question.

2. Is the priority given to spiritual work?

This suggestion that human work possesses intrinsic value under God seems to have been replaced in much contemporary evangelical thinking by a pietism that emphasises separation from the world and that views evangelism as our only vocation. Human work is only deemed important if it enables spiritual work. Hence, the role of the Christian in business is either to convert the person at the next desk – the customer, the client, or the supplier – or to provide the money to pay for more evangelists. Such an approach is flawed; it destroys purpose and dignity in the part of our lives that occupies at least 50% of our waking hours, vitiates ethical conduct, and reduces most of our life to secondary value. My contention is that business is much, much more important to God than this view appreciates.

The purely spiritual outlook of the efficacy of work turns on its head the Reformers’ critique of medieval Catholicism and the Reformed affirmation of the intrinsic value of all human labour. However, the light of much contemporary Roman Catholic teaching – not least in several papal encyclicals which we will consider in this series – the tables seem to have turned. In his encyclical Mater et Magistra (1961), Pope John XXIII sought to show that humanity expresses itself in work. He wrote, “Every man has, of his very nature, a need to express himself in his work and thereby to perfect his own being.”

Consequently, work conveys dignity. Thus, Pope John Paul II wrote in Laborem Exercens (1981) that “man’s life is built up every day from work, from work it derives its specific dignity.” This dignity reflects the nature of the Creator Himself.

To return to Dorothy Sayers, she established the principle mon grace and the idea of creation principles. We will explore these ideas later in this series. However, what these principles suggest, in essence, is that there is something of divine and intrinsic value in work. This is affirmed in the Protestant, Roman Catholic, and Eastern Orthodox Christian traditions. Darrell Cosden, in his book The Heavenly Good of Earthly Work, pointed out, “From a Christian point of view, all human work (and not just ‘religious work’) has eternal meaning and value.” Sayers, again, wrote that work “should be looked upon, not as a necessary drudgery to be undergone for the purpose of making money, but as a way of life in which the nature of man should find its proper exercise and delight and so fulfil itself to the glory of God.”

In a biblical theology of work, work cannot merely be instrumental due to the nature and goodness of God. Of course, work is necessary for reward and provision, but it is also an expression of human purpose. Consequently – as we will see as we turn to the theological principles and the biblical narrative – enterprise, entrepreneurship, beauty, and goodness are all divine elements that we find woven into human work.

Work is a deeply theological concept.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The Lasting and Creative Consequences of Daily Work
Over at The Gospel Coalition, Elise Amyx of IFWE offers encouragement to those who may feel their work is useless: Though some work may seem useless, Christians understand that all work is God’s work. Our work only seems insignificant because we fail to grasp the big picture. This is what economists refer to as the “knowledge problem.” The knowledge problem means we can’t always see the big picture because knowledge is dispersed among many people; no one person knows everything....
Do Rights Protect Autonomy or Duties?
Our right to religious freedom is best grounded in the universal duty to seek ultimate truth, says Joshua Schulz, and not in human autonomy. Here e to the fundamental paradox of modern liberalism. On the one hand, liberalism in all its stages has always treated human freedom as sacred. On the other hand, modern liberals also believe that in order to guarantee their freedom, they canin practiceuse the state’s coercive power pel others to do whattheybelieve is wrong. This is...
Much Ado About A ‘Transformationalist’ Nothing
What do Doug Wilson, William Evans, and I have mon? We’re all puzzled by the intramural attention D.G. Hart and Carl Trueman are paying to Tim Keller, Abraham Kuyper, and the “problem” of “transformationalism.” Trueman links Hart while raising concerns: I was struck by [Hart’s] account of Abraham Kuyper. Here was a (probable) genius and (definite) workaholic who had at his personal disposal a university, a newspaper and a denomination, and also held the highest political office in his land....
Prudent Stewardship and the Cappadocian Fathers
St. Basil the Great Today at Ethika Politika, I examine a few rules of prudent stewardship that follow from the teachings of the Cappadocian fathers on poverty, almsgiving, and fasting. One of the great challenges in this area today is how best to live outin our present context the statement of St. Basil the Great that “the money in your vaults belongs to the destitute.” In particular, I highlight these three guidelines to help guide prudent practices: [W]e must be...
Why a ‘Living Wage’ Can Hurt the Poor
Near the top of my long and ever-growing list of pet peeves is articles titled, “The Conservative Case for [Insert Proposal Usually Rejected by Conservatives Here].” It’s almost an iron-clad rule that before you even read the article you can be assured of that the case being made will use words that appeal to conservatives while being based on principles that are contrary to conservatism and/or reality. Take, for example, a recent op-ed in the New Statesman by British Conservative...
The Problem of ‘Giving Back to the Community’
A recent ad on our munity radio station here in Boise spoke of a business sponsor’s practice of “giving back to munity.” This is done, of course, by sponsoring the radio station and other similar causes. As a fan of the station in question, I’m grateful for such local sponsors, and I’m grateful that they give to munity in that way. There is, however, a problem – not with the practice, but with the way we describe it. The phrase...
The Politics of Civil Society
At the Washington Examiner, Timothy Carney writes (HT: The Transom), “When liberals talk munity, conservatives are too quick to raise the Gadsden Flag and shout, ‘Leave me alone!'” He goes on to examine “the reactions to catchphrases made famous by Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton — ‘You didn’t build that’ and ‘It takes a village.'” Despite the negative reaction from many conservatives, says Carney, Obama’s statement in its full context, ‘you didn’t build that’ is true. Obama’s line began this...
Noble Work Versus Savage Welfare
In eleven states in the union, welfare pays more than the average pretax first-year wage for a teacher. In thirty-nines states, it pays more than the starting wage for a secretary. And, in the three most generous states a person on welfare can take home more money than an puter programmer. Those are just some of the eye-opening and distressing findings in a new study by Michael Tanner and Charles Hughes of the Cato Institute on the “work versus welfare...
Does Loving The Poor Mean Keeping Them Poor?
Fr. James V. Schall, S.J., in an essay for The Catholic World Report, offers some points worth pondering regarding Christianity and poverty. Entitled “Do Christians Love Poverty,” Schall insists that we must make the distinction between loving the poor – actual people – and loving “poverty” in some abstract way. For that to happen, we have to be holistic, realistic and concrete in our intentions and actions. It would seem that our love of the poor, in some basic sense,...
Obamacare Reset: A Free Market Vision for Health Care Reform
“We are now three years into health care ‘reform’ and it is crystal clear that what we have is no reform at all,” says Dr. Nick Pandelidis in this week’s Acton Commentary. “As we are seeing, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as is typical of so many government program names, will result in just the opposite e. PPACA is unaffordable, it will harm patients, and it will do incalculable damage to human dignity.” The full text of his...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved