Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
A biblical theology of work, Part 1: Why work?
A biblical theology of work, Part 1: Why work?
Apr 20, 2026 4:12 PM

A recent article on the Powerblog celebrating the work of delivery drivers, who never seem to be included in the definition of an “essential worker,” reminded me that we do not spend enough time thinking about work from an economic or theological point of view. This series will present a biblical theology of work in three parts over ing weeks, reflecting on both the spiritual and economic significance of work.

I begin with three brief anecdotes that illustrate why this series is necessary.

First, around 2010, someone whom I did not know sat next to me in church. The sermon was terrible – an attack on business, banking, and the market economy whose message was based on deep ignorance. After service, I chatted with the individual. I remember his words when I asked him what his work was: He simply replied, “I am hated … but hated most of all by the church. I’m a banker.”

The second illustration involved a lawyer friend of mine who worked for a major firm in the City of London. He told me that he was viewed by his church leadership as a cash machine to employ more ministry assistants. Such a viewpoint is highly destructive of human purpose and human dignity.

The third example occurred when I had lunch a few years back with a city trader who attended a well-known church. He told me, quite openly, that he deeply appreciated the teaching he had received in his church over 30 years, but nothing – literally nothing – he heard ever helped him understand his place in the economy and his role in society.

What is the significance of work? Dorothy Sayers gave an address on the subject in 1942 titled Why Work? In that address, she stated that in respect of an intelligent carpenter, “The very first demand that his religion makes upon him is that he should make good tables.”

Note also what she did not say: The role is not to convert the workforce or the customer. She went on to add that the very worst religious films she had seen were those in which the actors were chosen exclusively for their piety. This raises for us two questions:

1. What is the purpose and value of human work?

The first thing we need to do is to ask why we work at all and why our work is important. Of course, one approach is to argue that the reason we work is to put food on the table, to provide for our own wants and needs. This is known as the instrumental view of work: Work has no purpose other than to provide. You can also see how this creates the idea that work is drudgery or even cursed; work is a distraction from the truly spiritual parts of life. This leads to the second question.

2. Is the priority given to spiritual work?

This suggestion that human work possesses intrinsic value under God seems to have been replaced in much contemporary evangelical thinking by a pietism that emphasises separation from the world and that views evangelism as our only vocation. Human work is only deemed important if it enables spiritual work. Hence, the role of the Christian in business is either to convert the person at the next desk – the customer, the client, or the supplier – or to provide the money to pay for more evangelists. Such an approach is flawed; it destroys purpose and dignity in the part of our lives that occupies at least 50% of our waking hours, vitiates ethical conduct, and reduces most of our life to secondary value. My contention is that business is much, much more important to God than this view appreciates.

The purely spiritual outlook of the efficacy of work turns on its head the Reformers’ critique of medieval Catholicism and the Reformed affirmation of the intrinsic value of all human labour. However, the light of much contemporary Roman Catholic teaching – not least in several papal encyclicals which we will consider in this series – the tables seem to have turned. In his encyclical Mater et Magistra (1961), Pope John XXIII sought to show that humanity expresses itself in work. He wrote, “Every man has, of his very nature, a need to express himself in his work and thereby to perfect his own being.”

Consequently, work conveys dignity. Thus, Pope John Paul II wrote in Laborem Exercens (1981) that “man’s life is built up every day from work, from work it derives its specific dignity.” This dignity reflects the nature of the Creator Himself.

To return to Dorothy Sayers, she established the principle mon grace and the idea of creation principles. We will explore these ideas later in this series. However, what these principles suggest, in essence, is that there is something of divine and intrinsic value in work. This is affirmed in the Protestant, Roman Catholic, and Eastern Orthodox Christian traditions. Darrell Cosden, in his book The Heavenly Good of Earthly Work, pointed out, “From a Christian point of view, all human work (and not just ‘religious work’) has eternal meaning and value.” Sayers, again, wrote that work “should be looked upon, not as a necessary drudgery to be undergone for the purpose of making money, but as a way of life in which the nature of man should find its proper exercise and delight and so fulfil itself to the glory of God.”

In a biblical theology of work, work cannot merely be instrumental due to the nature and goodness of God. Of course, work is necessary for reward and provision, but it is also an expression of human purpose. Consequently – as we will see as we turn to the theological principles and the biblical narrative – enterprise, entrepreneurship, beauty, and goodness are all divine elements that we find woven into human work.

Work is a deeply theological concept.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
VIDEO: ‘Doing the Right Thing’ with Chuck Colson
On September 24, thousands of people from all over the United States will tune in to a live webcast ofDoing the Right Thing, a discussion of the ethical crisis our country faces and what’s to be done about it. Doing the Right Thing is national project intended to spark an ethical reexamination by Americans. The initiative is led by Chuck Colson and group of Christian luminaries, including Acton’s director of programs, Michael Miller. Through a six-part DVD curriculum and live...
Commerce and Counseling
My friend Joe Knippenberg notes some of my musings on the field of “philosophical counseling,” and in fact articulates some of the concerns I share about the content of such practice. I certainly didn’t mean to uncritically praise the new field as it might be currently practiced (I did say, “The actual value of philosophical counseling (or perhaps better yet, philosophical tutoring) might be debatable.”). There are, in fact, better and worse philosophers as there is better and worse philosophy,...
Flash Mobbing King’s Dream
My contribution to this week’s Acton News & Commentary: Flash Mobbing King’s Dream by Anthony B. Bradley Every black person apprehended for robbing stores in a flash mob should have their court hearing not in front of a judge but facing the 30-foot statute of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. at his Washington memorial site. Each thief should be asked, “What do you think Dr. King would say to you right now?” I was not angry when I initially saw...
The Church’s African, Middle Eastern and Asian Roots
The Brotherhood of St. Moses the Black, an Orthodox Christian organization that provides information about “ancient Christianity and its deep roots in Africa,” is holding a conference Aug. 26-28 in the Detroit area. In a story in the Observer & Eccentric newspaper about the ing conference, a reporter interviewed a woman by the name of Sharon Gomulka who had visited an Orthodox Church several years ago on the feast day of St. Moses the Black (or sometimes called The Ethiopian)....
The Folly of More Centralized Power
mentary this week addresses the importance of federalism and our fundamental founding principles in relation to the problems that plague the nation. There was once plenty mentary and finger pointing in regards to setting a new tone of political and civil discourse in the nation. However, the more the Washington power structure is threatened by those unsatisfied with where the leadership is taking us, the more those demanding a return to first principles will be splattered with, at times, revolting...
Gregg: Two Principles Candidates Must Hold Dear
Director of Research Samuel Gregg has a piece in Public Discourse today as part of a series on the 2012 presidential election. “Fix America’s Economy: Two Principles for Reform” explains why limited government is better government, and how the principle of subsidiarity can guide regulation that governments undertake. From the essay: The economist Arthur Brooks is exactly right when he notes that the end-game of America’s free enterprise culture is not the endless acquisition of wealth. The goal is human...
Debate: Capitalism vs Distributism
“More and more, I find Catholics dividing themselves into capitalist and distributist camps,” writes Bernardo Aparicio García, president of the Catholic journal Dappled Things. To help readers establish “a firm foundation” for thinking about economic questions, García opened up the pages of his journal to Robert T. Miller, for capitalism, and John C. Médaille, for distributism. The result is a lengthy exchange “On Truth and Trade: Economics and the Catholic Vision of the Good Life.” Miller is a professor of...
What Would Jesus Cut? Who’s Asking, the Pharisees?
The next skirmish over the country’s financial direction e in September as Congress tries to prepare for the federal government’s new fiscal year, which starts October 1st. The Christian Left has quoted the Bible quite freely during the budget battle, throwing around especially the “red letter” words of Christ in its campaign to protect all of the federal government’s poverty programs (even those so riddled with fraud that the White House wants to cut them). It seems bizarre, then, that...
Richard Epstein takes on papal economics
Noted NYU law professor and free-market advocate Richard Epstein has written a provocative piece titled “How is Warren Buffett like the Pope? They are both dead wrong on economics.” Here’s the money quote: The great advantage petition in markets is that it exhausts all gains from trade, which thus allows individuals to attain higher levels of welfare. These win/win propositions may not reach the perfect endpoint, but they will avoid the woes that are now consuming once prosperous economies. Understanding...
Proto-Marxists in Acts of the Apostles?
Commenting on Warren Buffet’s call to raise taxes on the “mega-rich,” North Carolina Minister Andrew Daugherty says this on Associated Baptist Press (HT: RealClearReligion): Unlike some of our political leaders and media pundits, the gospel does not make false distinctions between the “makers” and the “takers,” the deserving and the undeserving or the hard-working and the hardly-working. Instead, we are told that the first Christians had all things mon. They would sell their possessions and goods and distribute the proceeds...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved