Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
3 Modern Economic Lessons from an Ancient Tax on Windows
3 Modern Economic Lessons from an Ancient Tax on Windows
Jul 14, 2025 9:51 PM

King William III of England needed money, so in 1696 he decided to implement a new property tax. To make sure the tax was progressive (i.e., affected the rich more than the poor), the parliament devised a seemingly clever idea: they’d use the number of windows as an index for the value of a house.

The assumption was that larger homes, presumably owned by the wealthy, would have more windows than the houses of the poor. All a tax assessor needed to do to calculate the tax was walk around a building and count the windows. Ingenious, no?

In its initial form, the tax consisted of a flat rate of 2 shillings upon each house and an additional charge of 4 shillings on houses with between 10 and 20 windows, or 8 shillings on houses with more than 20 windows.

You can probably imagine what happened next.

As economistTim Hartford explains, a “fundamental error is the idea that architecture doesn’t respond to tax incentives.”

When William Pitt tripled the tax in 1797, thousands of windows were bricked or boarded up almost overnight. Later, the president of the society of carpenters in London told Parliament that almost every homeowner on Compton Street had approached him to reduce the number of windows. A new apartment building in Edinburgh was designed with an entire second floor filled with windowless bedrooms.

When [Charles] plained that the poor were being denied light and air, he wasn’t speaking figuratively. Poor people did not have to pay the tax out of their own pockets but their landlords did, and the poor dwelt in stuffy darkness as a result.

The effect of cutting off the light and air was that the health of the people living in homes with few or no windows deteriorated considerably. As Thomas Guthrie wrote in 1867:

In order to reduce the window tax, every window that even poverty could dispense with was built up, and all sources of ventilation were thus removed. The smell in the house was overpowering and offensive to an unbearable extent. There is no evidence that the fever was imported into this house, but it was propagated from it to other parts of town, and 52 of the inhabitants were killed.

plaints about the tax—Charles Dickens claimed that, “Neither air nor light have been free since the imposition of the window tax.”—it endured for 150 years.

So what can we learn from a tax that was repealed in 1851? The primary lesson is that people respond to incentives—and often in ways we wouldn’t have predicted.

A tax collector in 1700 might have considered it irrational to board up a window to save a few shillings. But that’s exactly what happened—often because the person paying the tax wasn’t always affected by the effect of avoiding it. Many landlords couldn’t simply pass on the tax to their renters; the people were simply too poor. Instead, they found it was cheaper to simply shut up the windows and avoid the tax altogether. The ill effects on the tenants was merely a unintended consequence.

And this leads to the second lesson: When the government increases the economic burden of the wealthy, it almost always affects the poor. We’ve seen this time and time again throughout economic history, from minimum wage laws to “luxury taxes.” Whenever the rich have to pay more they’ll eventually pass along the cost to those who can’t afford it.

The third lesson is the most unfortunate: Governments are loath to repeal bad economic policies even when it’s obvious that it hurts its poorest citizens. Preventing the bad policy before it’s implemented is sometimes the only way to keep it from affecting the poor for generations.

So the next time someone asks why you’re so opposed to increasing the minimum wage or taxes on yachts, tell them “Because of King William’s window tax.”

“Window”byAngel Xavier Vierais licensed underCC BY-ND 2.0

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Marx vs. the universal basic income
While a universal basic e has been advocated by everyone from Bernie Sanders to Charles Murray and Pope Francis, the name most associated with wealth redistribution is Marx. However, in a little-known writing Marx specifically opposed the UBI, calling it inefficient and counterproductive. The policy would leave many of its intended beneficiaries worse off, he wrote. Of course, we’re discussing Ive Marx, an economist and sociology professor at the University of Antwerp. Marx’s scholarly work focuses on wealth redistribution and...
Weekend viewing: Watch ‘America Lost’ for free
For a few moments, filmmaker Christopher Rufo’s documentary America Lost seemed in danger of ing an anachronism. But in the age of coronavirus shutdown orders, his portrait of life in the forgotten, jobless corners of America could not be more timely. Rufo spent years interviewing and documenting the lives of struggling people in the depressed cities of Youngstown, Ohio; Memphis, Tennessee; and Stockton, California. (You can read our review here.) Rufo—who serves as director of theDiscovery Institute’s Center on Wealth,...
Acton Line podcast: Responding to a Harvard prof’s call to ban homeschooling
Homeschooling is growing in popularity. In fact, the U.S. Department of Education has shown that it’s grown at a rate of over 60% in the last decade, as many families are deciding that educating their children at home is better than sending them to public or private schools. But Harvard University has a different opinion. In Harvard Magazine’s May/June 2020 issue, one Harvard Law School professor calls for a ban on homeschooling, saying it may keep children from “contributing positively...
Build yourself, build society
One of Christ’s best-known parables is the Parable of the Talents, but its familiarity disguises just how strange and unsettling its message is. It is a parable of a master who departs on a journey and entrusts three servants, each according to his ability, with his property. Each receives five, two, or one talent(s), respectively. The ablest servant departed, immediately put the money to work, and doubled his master’s talents. The servant entrusted with two talents did the same. But...
COVID-19 reminds us of the humanizing aspect of work
With “shelter-in-place” orders across the country during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, most employees are not allowed to enter their work places unless their work is considered “essential” by their state and local governments. Opportunities for normal employment have been disrupted for millions of people around the world. Sadly, many workers have been furloughed, others laid off entirely, and the fortunate ones, thanks to advances in technology, are able to work from home. Beyond the obvious financial implications for individuals, and...
What to do about China?
Crises are not only opportunities which should, to paraphrase Rahm Emmanuel, never be allowed go to waste. They also serve as clarifying moments. Unexpected events can shatter even the strongest consensus on a given topic. The coronavirus pandemic is such a moment when es to America’s relationship with China. Until relatively recently, most Western policymakers calculated that a steady integration of China into the global economy would be of mutual economic benefit for China and Western nations. Trade with other...
COVID-19, socialized medicine and ‘deaths of despair’
The American healthcare industry is undergoing a massive stress test known as the coronavirus. For months and years e, analysts will be issuing their opinions about just how well that industry performed under the incredible, sudden surge of the pandemic. Given the massive influx of stimulus funding for healthcare and programs like Medicare, no one should be surprised about a “barrage” of new lobbying activity and a surge of activism for single payer or universal health care. Getting just ahead...
Acton Line podcast: Randy Barnett and David French on ‘common-good Constitutionalism’
On March 31, The Atlantic published an article titled “Beyond Originalism,” written by Adrian Vermeule, professor of Constitutional law at Harvard Law School. In this piece, Vermeule argues that “the dominant conservative philosophy for interpreting the constitution has served its purpose and scholars ought to develop a more moral framework.” Originalist interpretations of the Constitution simply no longer serve mon good, Vermeule says. What does he mean by this, and is he correct? In this episode, we’re featuring two different...
Cooperation, not coercion, will defeat COVID-19
As the COVID-19 crisis rolls on, many of America’s governors have continued to impose, extend, or add new restrictions to stay-at-home orders. This has led to increasingly arbitrary rule-making and growing criticism over the prudence and practicality of such measures. Thankfully, individuals and institutions rely on more than government diktats to guide their behavior. In turn, amid the government overreach and tense ideological debates, civil society appears to be self-governing rather well—marked by plenty of individual restraint, collective wisdom, and...
Cooperation vs. coercion amid COVID-19
As the COVID-19 crisis rolls on, many of America’s governors have continued to impose, extend or add new restrictions to stay-at-home orders, leading to increasingly arbitrary rule-making and growing criticism over the prudence and practicality of such measures. Thankfully, individuals and institutions rely on more than government diktats to guide their behavior. In turn, amid the government overreach and tense ideological debates, civil society appears to be self-governing rather well — marked by plenty of individual restraint, collective wisdom and...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved